I was doing a bit of reading on the movie "Prisoners" - Dune director Denis Villeneuve's first English language movie as I understand it - about how its meant to be a sort of deconstruction of movies like Taken from around the same era. Now from what I understand, the movie is a hell of a thriller that will have a vice like grip on your heart and your arsehole at different times; recommended go watch.
However, I don't buy the alleged deconstructive aspect. A movie is all about believability in the moment. Now sure, Hugh Jackman makes an utter fucking fiasco of his attempt at vigilante heroism: but that's because he's a fucking carpenter and on the verge of a complete breakdown and a man who until this point lived a very normal existence with no capacity for instinctual violence. Conversely, Liam Neeson's character in Taken is a former military/intelligence field operative who has the experience, the training, the knowledge, the attitude and the contacts in friendly countries to make his feats against the villains while still highly improbable, justifiable given his CV. I feel like if they wanted to sort of take it apart that way, the needed a closer mirror to Taken (or Man on Fire) to make the point work.
Luckily Villeneuve and team still made a very, very respectable movie out of it with some powerhouse performances.
Jackman's character is a prepper/survivalist. We're introduced to him hunting; a very traditional and idealized manly act, signifying him providing for his family. And as the movie progresses it's shown he's a man who is (expected anyway) to take the lead and do things his own way. We see he has shelves of canned goods, and he has his daughter wearing a safety whistle. While this doesn't make him an ex-commando, he isn't just your average dad who works as a carpenter. He has dedicated a lot of time and effort into feeling in control of the dangers around him. And what he does to Paul Dano's character makes it clear he
does have the capacity for violence. They also cast Hugh Jackman for a reason. The movie isn't a deconstruction first, as it's more about the tragedy and mystery, but there's definitely an element of deconstruction. Not necesarily of
Taken, but of those kinds of movies, the '...and only one man can stop them' type movies.
Prisoners is ultimately about being helpless, and how the "one man" is just as powerless to do anything. The end really drives it home,
where's he's completely dominated by an old lady with a gun. Now, even disregarding any comparison to Taken, with everything we've seen Jackman's character accomplish thus far this one old woman shouldn't be too much trouble for him, but she is. And only because she has a gun. That scene highlights what is probably the realism of being held at gunpoint, where you don't just dive out of the way like the action hero does in the movie, because I mean... it's a gun - what are the chances you're not totally getting shot and killed? In that moment it pretty much deconstructs the character that Jackman was up till that point.
And then at the very end it's him blowing that safety whistle.