DustArma[]
Thaius said:
RedEyesBlackGamer said:
NOT EVERY GODDAMN GAME NEEDS MULTIPLAYER!
Now that I got that out of the way, their logic baffles me. Trying to bring in a new audience with the third game in a trilogy is just stupid.
One of the most simple, yet apparently difficult to grasp, truths I have read all day. I agree fully.
I have another.
NOT EVERY GAME THAT HAS MULTIPLAYER IS RUINED FOREVER, ESPECIALLY NOT WHEN THE MULTIPLAYER COMPONENT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SINGLEPLAYER AND IS BEING DEVELOPED BY A DIFFERENT STUDIO.
Ahem, caps lock off, anyway, Assassin's Creed Brotherhood, the singleplayer, albeit shorter, can be argued to be as good or better than AC2's singleplayer, and the multiplayer is just great.