It does its formula well. As a person who likes the CoD series, I don't care about innovation as long as CoD still has the satisfying feel of letting me shoot people in the face.
MW3 no different than MW2....(some MW3 gameplay)
- Thread starter yuval152
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Modern Warfare 2 £11.99 over at Amazon and £14.99 from Steam.Death_Korps_Kommissar said:
Thats the kind of price a few people pay for games like that.
As for MW3, was anyone seriously expecting a drastically different game or just a re-wrapped MW2?
We all knew it was coming and we all know it's still going to shift around 20 million units.
Dice's Battlefield is the Grandfather of all online multilayer everywhere. We would not have multilayer as we understand it today and I will always thank Dice for that. That being said, few games/brands are as great for the local multi-player parties in the man-cave as CoD:MW. But I digress...
Tell me what part is that? The "awesome" community(it does count as a part if your game is based online T.T")? The kill streaks? The maps?AkaDad said:
Now I'm not slandering them for just making Mw2 again(even if´s a cheap move) it´s that they making it again, and selling it at full price, that my friend, is bullshit!
Hi? Heard about Id? From your statement it doesn't sound like you have.TinyMAG said:
Looks great to me, in that it looks a lot like MW2. Black Ops was ok, but I felt it was a bit of a wrong turn for the series where multiplayer was concerned. Things seem to be back on track in that regard.
whoa people non stop running around 1 shotting with the ump. oh and quickscopes!!! i have never seen that b4 in my life -.-
and now did he say THREE perks. don't go crazy on us activision lol.
but trolling aside this looks like the least changed game of them all... and that's saying alot considering they barely changed any of the previous titles (i have played and beaten EVERY CoD game btw.) and common really these games are already unbalanced, and pretty much a giant clusterfuck of getting 1 shotted and blown up. so to balance it they add another max perk and MORE killstreaks. jesus i give up.
it looks like i will finally put a stop to getting this series :/. a family member will probably buy me it for christmas though (and if that happens i will just beat the single player, screw the mp). but i refuse to spend my own money on this
and now did he say THREE perks. don't go crazy on us activision lol.
but trolling aside this looks like the least changed game of them all... and that's saying alot considering they barely changed any of the previous titles (i have played and beaten EVERY CoD game btw.) and common really these games are already unbalanced, and pretty much a giant clusterfuck of getting 1 shotted and blown up. so to balance it they add another max perk and MORE killstreaks. jesus i give up.
it looks like i will finally put a stop to getting this series :/. a family member will probably buy me it for christmas though (and if that happens i will just beat the single player, screw the mp). but i refuse to spend my own money on this
Soo they are going to want
$60 for the game
$15 per map pack
and how ever much they are going to demand for COD elite
Color (colour for those of you divided by a common language) me not interested, looks like it could be fun, but, I'm not paying a lot of money for that.
$60 for the game
$15 per map pack
and how ever much they are going to demand for COD elite
Color (colour for those of you divided by a common language) me not interested, looks like it could be fun, but, I'm not paying a lot of money for that.
But you go into a thread that states in the thread title that mw3 is no different from mw2 and as such does harness a lot of comments that are like that?AkaDad said:
Again, fucking Id, stop giving cred to people that don't deserve it(someone most likely did it before Id but Id was the first ones to do it and get a following).sivlin said:
I came into the thread to point out that they are different. They have different stories and different settings. The premise of the thread is false.kebab4you said:
Edit: If this was a thread about Madden NFL, then you would have a good argument that they're the same, because the setting is exactly the same, year to year.
Well I can't wait for more COD crack! Looks awesome...new gamemodes and styles of play will be a nice change!
You could argue its a different story, its basically going to be.AkaDad said:
"BLAH BLAH BLAH, OLD SUPERPOWER GAINS NUCLEAR BENT ON NUKING THE WHOLE PLANET *reason not explained* So you go across the country, THE ONLY solider in the United of Completely and Utter Democratically Ass Kicking because freedom is for cool kids. And your the only solider who showed up on training day. And your also God in a mortal trench coat.
GO KILL SUPER POWER!"
Which has been the FUCKING story for the most recent games.
Its going to sell like fucking hot cakes because kids under a realistic age will force their parents to buy it on launch because it was this or not be popular.AkaDad said:
Quality is not sales. Its likely you could makes the best game of the decade and it won't sell OR you could make the worse and it will always sell. Seriously, I'm going to go onto my soapbox and say that most, if not ALL indie games released this decade would kick more ass then this one does. And for a lower cost.
Can I get something off my chest? Please? Why are we still arguing about MW3 and BF3? Huh? BF3 is probably going to be a better engine (and it shows on PC) but the consoles are getting stuck with half of the Frames per second of MW3 (30FPS-60FPS). So in that regards BF3 might look better on consoles, MW3 Will feel better. Personally I'll get BF3 on my gaming PC and I'll get MW3 on Console.