This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard, it IS illegal on the internet, but filtering the internet is not like making child porn illegal in cinemas, it's like banning all cameras and camcorders because someone somewhere might use them to film some child porn."Images of child abuse, child pornography - they are not legal in our cinemas. Why should you be able to see them on the internet?"
I'd like to start a proposition banning the Austrailian goverment from any forms of communication, after all. They might inexplicably spread child pornography.colonel_alzheimers said:So basically, if you mention that child pornography might be involved, you can do whatever the fuck you want.
Yeah, but at least in the Midwest they respect a man's right to porn.Doug said:It'll be just like the US mid west. Only with more poisonous creatures.Outlaw Torn said:So Australia is going to be a safe haven for empty headed religious extremists and old people who think every generation after their own is the work of satan?
I remember reading something along the lines of "do anything in the name of the children and no one can argue with your cause." I could swear I read that in Mein Kampf, yeah, freedom ftw Australia.colonel_alzheimers said:So basically, if you mention that child pornography might be involved, you can do whatever the fuck you want.
This hits the spot for me!JediMB said:...Andy Chalk said:"why should you treat the internet differently from any form of communications like films and books and so on," she said.
...
What.
Last time I checked, films and books weren't forms of communication. Forms of communication include, although not exclusively, speech, letter-writing, telephone calls and drums.
Books and films are media. The Internet contains media, but in itself isn't any more a form of media than telephone calls are when you're playing music into your phone.
This post wins.awesomeClaw said:Im reminded of an old saying. "Those who sacriface liberty for safety deserve neither"
Benjamin FranklinawesomeClaw said:Im reminded of an old saying. "Those who sacriface liberty for safety deserve neither"
The bible belt states consume more porn than any where else.Ryokai said:Yeah, but at least in the Midwest they respect a man's right to porn.Doug said:It'll be just like the US mid west. Only with more poisonous creatures.Outlaw Torn said:So Australia is going to be a safe haven for empty headed religious extremists and old people who think every generation after their own is the work of satan?
yup, and your avatar embodies my view of this decision.tehbeard said:Australian goverment,
Still convinced their citizens are all criminals.
I'm one of the seven people living in Australia, and I don't like you.GrinningManiac said:I support this!
It's HILARIOUS to watch governments go absaloutely wrong on something and go for crap and nuthin'
...plus, there are like, what, seven people living in Australia? It won't affect ANYONE!!!
The good news is that given the rampant stupidity shown by both major parties, the Greens have a pretty good chance to take control of the senate in this next election which would let them block any of this idiocy, hopefully they choose to and it doesn't get tossed in as a bargaining chip for some other BS legislation...Zhukov said:And this is why I vote for the Greens.
They do not attempt this sort of crap. Also, this way, when one of the major parties goes and does something stupid, I don't have to feel responsible.
Although Labor did get my preferences... damn it.