I like the way you think.The_root_of_all_evil said:What would really be a good idea is to bring back series that hadn't received that treatment so far...like Blake's 7.
Just a thought.
Some of these, I want to say "Too soon" because of their being fairly-modern shows. Others, I want to say "Doesn't need it", like with Twilight Zone and Outer Limits. (Those two shows in particular had a huge original run plus another long reboot series each.) For Babylon-5, I wouldn't even know where to start. It's a very full and complete universe. Some of those shows, I don't even know. Out of them all, I WOULD like to see something for...The_root_of_all_evil said:Hmmm...Foster said the Klingons in his series are growing tired of having to rely on the Federation for support following the Praxis incident [look it up, non-nerds] while the Ferengi have stumbled upon some kind of new resource that has given them a windfall of wealth and power.
Strange feeling about this...it's like if the Ferengi had discoveredoildilithium reserves and the Klingons didn't want theUNFederation Council involved...
But that would be crazy to mix fantasy and reality like that...
Of course, if they actually go back to the original title sequence and not that god-awful Enterprise garbage, they might win a few fans back. And you know they're going to redo the Decontamination Gel scene.
What would really be a good idea is to bring back series that hadn't received that treatment so far...like Blake's 7, Firefly, Space:Above and Beyond, Babylon 5, The Twilight Zone, Space 1999, Sliders, The Outer Limits, Logan's Run, Andromeda, Lexx, Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, Land of the Giants, Lost in Space, Nowhere Man, The Greatest American Hero, Buck Rogers in the 25th Century, Earth: Final Conflict, Farscape, Max Headroom, Star Cops, The Tomorrow People, Eureka, Terrahawks, Fireball XL5...
Just a thought.
um.. slight problem, how can the doctor push the buttons on the console if he just turned off the ability to touch things?LiquidGrape said:Anything with Roddenberry's original concept as the starting point sounds like a good idea. I really didn't like Abrams' film at all.
And hey, maybe we can finally get that QLGBT character Seven of Nine was supposed to be?
Speaking of...no mention of Voyager in the timeline described in the first paragraph?
It means that, rather than having to carry phasers, all Starfleet personnel have weapons grafted into their hand. So they can point at the enemy and yell "PEW!", and kablooey!Fronzel said:What the heck does that mean?...cutting-edge future technologies...
The Lugz said:um.. slight problem, how can the doctor push the buttons on the console if he just turned off the ability to touch things?LiquidGrape said:Anything with Roddenberry's original concept as the starting point sounds like a good idea. I really didn't like Abrams' film at all.
And hey, maybe we can finally get that QLGBT character Seven of Nine was supposed to be?
Speaking of...no mention of Voyager in the timeline described in the first paragraph?
trek.. you so crazee.
Logic says we're dead.Metal Brother said:I like the way you think.The_root_of_all_evil said:What would really be a good idea is to bring back series that hadn't received that treatment so far...like Blake's 7.
Just a thought.
Ah, Wilma Deering...FalloutJack said:Blake's 7 (Why not?)
Firefly (Fan favorite.)
Logan's Run (This was cool!)
Buck Rogers (Because if there's a John Carter movie going on, I say to go for it.)
The great grandpappy of Thunderbirds and Captain Scarlet.Ummm...what's Fireball XL5? I'm 30 and I have no idea what kind of show that is.