A Fallout set in the Eastern Bloc would be nice, I'm thinking like Poland or maybe Czech Republic seeing as how a post-nuclear Russia would be a little to obvious.
Next Fallout: Ideas?
- Thread starter Russian Pancake
- Start date
Recommended Videos
The music is a big deal. May I recommend anything but country? In NV I left the radio off because the DJ was boring. Three dog was cool because he had serious style. Fun DJ is a must.
Use new york, chicago, denver, or detroit! Detroit. The factories, the river, the drastic differences between one side of town and the other. Detroit is a huge industrial area. That would be killer.
In 3 the super mutants were inhuman, stupid, and so evil. The NV mutants were terribly benign and it was difficult to get interested with them being so intelligent and social. More variety of enemies. Though these are not FPS' they definitely are better with the battle aspect. I like to find creative ways to fight, like how to kill a behemoth in one blow, etc. There should be some odd side quests in the next one that challenge the player to do things, like insane sniping, kill this enemy without wearing any armor, etc.
No reloading and crafting. It was annoying and not worth the time. You could have a vendor that you take your spent materials to and they could do the reloading for you.
In 3 you did some talking, but not endlessly. You'd talk to someone and then have to go on a journey to accomplish something. In NV you did almost nothing but walk and talk. Like the guys you would talk to and they'd say "I'd do it but I am busy" and the person they wanted to talk to was on the other side of the camp... gimme a break. Give me a puzzle, something hard to do. I don't play games to be a messenger.
I liked the vault dweller. The next character could be someone in the Enclave or some other noteworthy group. I was happy to be able to choose a good or bad side, or somewhere in the middle in 3. In NV there was no real difference. Everything was catch 22, so why bother?
Rather than two hundred years or so later, try setting it ten or twenty years after the bombs fell. The challenge of surviving the environment issues and the chaos would be cool.
My nephew and I loved blowing up megaton and hearing deputy weld promise that the bomb was perfectly safe. It's such a moody game; some satire must be thrown in to keep it fun.
Extensive testing of these games is a must. Both 3 and NV are so glitched that you sometimes cant play the game, see where you are going, fall through the ground, or the game machine locks up and you have to shut it down.
-Eden Rose Archer
Novelist
Use new york, chicago, denver, or detroit! Detroit. The factories, the river, the drastic differences between one side of town and the other. Detroit is a huge industrial area. That would be killer.
In 3 the super mutants were inhuman, stupid, and so evil. The NV mutants were terribly benign and it was difficult to get interested with them being so intelligent and social. More variety of enemies. Though these are not FPS' they definitely are better with the battle aspect. I like to find creative ways to fight, like how to kill a behemoth in one blow, etc. There should be some odd side quests in the next one that challenge the player to do things, like insane sniping, kill this enemy without wearing any armor, etc.
No reloading and crafting. It was annoying and not worth the time. You could have a vendor that you take your spent materials to and they could do the reloading for you.
In 3 you did some talking, but not endlessly. You'd talk to someone and then have to go on a journey to accomplish something. In NV you did almost nothing but walk and talk. Like the guys you would talk to and they'd say "I'd do it but I am busy" and the person they wanted to talk to was on the other side of the camp... gimme a break. Give me a puzzle, something hard to do. I don't play games to be a messenger.
I liked the vault dweller. The next character could be someone in the Enclave or some other noteworthy group. I was happy to be able to choose a good or bad side, or somewhere in the middle in 3. In NV there was no real difference. Everything was catch 22, so why bother?
Rather than two hundred years or so later, try setting it ten or twenty years after the bombs fell. The challenge of surviving the environment issues and the chaos would be cool.
My nephew and I loved blowing up megaton and hearing deputy weld promise that the bomb was perfectly safe. It's such a moody game; some satire must be thrown in to keep it fun.
Extensive testing of these games is a must. Both 3 and NV are so glitched that you sometimes cant play the game, see where you are going, fall through the ground, or the game machine locks up and you have to shut it down.
-Eden Rose Archer
Novelist
Actually in the Fallout Universe, Canada became America when the annexed it for clear passage to Anchorage. Introducing Fallout outside of America would need a complete new concept on the Wasteland because those areas would have only been decimated with radiation from the bombs, and from the wars that were fought with the Middle East, the Wasteland would be a lot different. It would be a very interesting thing to see though and I am not opposed to it if they do it properly with GOOD canon.artanis_neravar said:
I want to see what happened to China after the Great War. It would make a great setting IMO w/ all the communist pre-war propaganda, not to mention it could be a legitimate wasteland being the other major power during the war. I'll also give another vote to London. I also really REALLY wanna see Texas if we have to chose somewhere stateside.Actually since theres so many good spots how about a few wastelands that you can travel between.
I want to see a Fallout game world built by Bethesda, with a script written by Obsidian. Now how much ass would that kick, am I right?
Go to another country, definitely. Maybe even several. And Australia could be the only place in the world that isn't irradiated - so everyone is fighting over it, without nukes.
Fallout: Great Southern Land
How do make a country filled with stuff that will kill you scarier? Nuke it in the Fallout universe. Imagine a funnel-web spider the size of tank, or drop bears.
How do make a country filled with stuff that will kill you scarier? Nuke it in the Fallout universe. Imagine a funnel-web spider the size of tank, or drop bears.
I'd like to see a Fallout game set in and around Vancouver (me being a native Vancouverite myself). Even though, before the Great War, the United States annexed Canada, I still doubt most of Canada was hit as hard as (most of) the USA. There are more than a few landmarks to see (now that the Olympics are over, even more so) in and around the city.
As far as DLC goes, I guess you could hop on a railway and head out to the interior of BC, or even as far as the prairies, though that'd be a little... empty. Other than that, I don't have much.
As far as DLC goes, I guess you could hop on a railway and head out to the interior of BC, or even as far as the prairies, though that'd be a little... empty. Other than that, I don't have much.
VEHICLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JUST GIVE US A QUAD OR DIRTBIKE THAT DOUBLES MOVEMENT SPEED!!!!!!!
PLEASE HEAR MY CRY BETHESDA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
that is all
JUST GIVE US A QUAD OR DIRTBIKE THAT DOUBLES MOVEMENT SPEED!!!!!!!
PLEASE HEAR MY CRY BETHESDA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
that is all