Wrong.Fagotto said:Oh, so context is beyond you. See, 'editing' when talking about 'quotes' would imply I'm changing your words.PhiMed said:I don't smoke... anything.Fagotto said:I wonder what you're smoking because I didn't edit anything you said. Try again?PhiMed said:Wow... I'd counter you, but after reading your consecutive, picky, MST3K-on-meth style replies, I think I'd send you over the edge. Here's a tip: edit people's quotes more. They love it.Fagotto said:And don't forget that they're all members of the Illuminati and secretly rule the world.PhiMed said:I think your analysis leaves out something critical: female responsibility. You're correct that Nice Guys TM have an agenda. And EVERY FEMALE ON EARTH OVER THE AGE OF 14 knows that, too.
Or wait, we can be reasonable human beings and realize that you're just being ridiculous.
Or they could assume that the person is a friend instead of a douche who thinks money can buy a gf. Oh no, alternate possibilities!But they are frequently content to play innocent, as if they have no idea that the guy living in abject poverty, who works two jobs in addition to attending school, who bought them a $200 gift "as a friend" might have something else in mind.
You're just as bad. Instead you'll whine about how they're all wimps. they're not hypermasculine enough! Get a real complaint, srsly. Dishonesty, entitlement. But no, they're... wimps! Learn to leave the schoolyard taunts behind and grow up.Yes, these guys are passive-aggressive, unassertive wimps. All the more reason not to allow them to convince themselves that there is a chance. Ever. These guys continue their behavior because women make the conscious decision to allow them to do so. Because they enjoy the attention, because they are craven, small, insecure people themselves. Not all women. Just all the women who allow this to continue.
I bow to your psychic expertise. Or I laugh at you for pretending you think you know that 95% women involved know. But for those who talk about 'pansies' etc... well they're the kind of people who despise actual intellect and reasoning so taking a step back and realizing you don't know everything would be uncharacteristic. Admitting that you don't know would be showing weakness and Thog can't show weakness!So stop pretending that you didn't know, and that the Nice GuyTM always brings this up as a complete surprise. You know. 95% of the women this has happened to know. You just wrote an entire article detailing your extensive knowledge of the phenomenon. Accept a little responsibility for enabling these pansies, and shift a little responsibility to those without a Y chromosome.
Yes, just like your degree is pseudopsychology says.And by the way, there's a reason these men are so timid. Young women, when they reject someone, are vicious. It's socially empowering for a women to publicly humiliate a male. Negative reinforcement is a powerful motivator. Women created these sissies.
Did you know 103% of people like you make statistics up based on nothing? Isn't that just stupid?I was one of them, briefly. Then I realized that there are two options that will result in a woman finding a male attractive (not every woman, mind you, but probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 1/3): 1)Treat her as if you are GOING to sleep with her. Even if you don't use explicit terminology, become almost TOO affectionate, as soon as you meet them (warning: use only if at least moderately physically attractive). 2)Treat her as if you find her to border on being repugnant.
By the font statistics made up on the spot? Why yes, that's true.Stop saying women like nice guys, but don't like Nice GuysTM. Women like jerks. It's well-established.
You're spending too much time arguing with strangers. Seek help.
Parsing is editing. Any person who has ever dealt in film, audio, or print of any kind will tell you that. But you probably didn't know that, so I'll just chalk it up to good old fashioned ignorance on your part.
But cutting posts... well that's just addressing parts separately. But if it makes your brain hurt, then do run off.
Cutting posts, especially the line-by-line snarky style that you use, is not addressing parts separately. It's unforgivable laziness reserved for people who never learned how to properly compose an argument. If you don't know how to write in a way that directs your reader to opposing points, take a class or read a book on rhetorical composition. Until you do, there's really no difference between you and someone who writes everything they say in all caps.