I've never liked handhelds dispite my Pokemon days as a child.
But with Starfox and Zelda coming out fot his i'd actually consider this.
But with Starfox and Zelda coming out fot his i'd actually consider this.
they rerelseased it for the gamecube twiceDragu_ said:I don't get it. How many of you have played it? Quite a few. How many of you guys own a 64 and the game? Barely any! Why?
You DO know OOT ran originally at 320x240 on N64?unholyavenger13 said:what is the point to this?
it was brilliant why put it on a console that wont do it justice
oh i know for the money
i wasnt talking about the graphics the controls will make it so it never surpasses the originalslopeslider said:You DO know OOT ran originally at 320x240 on N64?unholyavenger13 said:what is the point to this?
it was brilliant why put it on a console that wont do it justice
oh i know for the money
And you DO know the 3ds has an effective resolution of 400x240?
And power at LEAST, CURRENTLY I might add (a couple months after dev's got their kits) on par with ps2/gamecube in regards to just about everything but raw poly-pushing power?
And yet you say it won't do it justice.
They see me trollin, they hatin'.....
I would write either "I wouldn't want to see my beloved DS titles turned into 3D by what would sure be some imperfect 'one algorithm fits all' 3DS conversion", or "I wouldn't want to see my beloved DS titles turned into 3D by what is sure to be some imperfect 'one algorithm fits all' 3DS conversion".danpascooch said:I wouldn't want to see my beloved DS titles turned into 3D by what would sure to be some imperfect "one algorithm fits all" 3DS conversion.
EDIT: I know saying "what is sure to be" is correct, but "what would sure to be" doesn't sound right to me, can anyone who knows what they're talking about let me know if "what would sure to be" is grammatically correct? It's kind of driving me nuts.