Nintendo Will "Never" Develop For Other Platforms, Says Iwata

Recommended Videos

Infernal Lawyer

New member
Jan 28, 2013
611
0
0
Roxor said:
Okay, so they don't want to put their games on other consoles. Fair enough. What about the PC? Any chance of a Nintendo counterpart to Steam to let you emulate all the old games for Nintendo's past systems?
They already have a virtual console that plays old games. Still, I'm very much in favor of this idea.

"If I was to take responsibility for the company for just the next one or two years, and if I was not concerned about the long-term future of Nintendo at all, it might make sense for us to provide our important franchises for other platforms, and then we might be able to gain some short-term profit."

"However, I'm really responsible for the long-term future of Nintendo as well, so I would never think about providing our precious resources for other platforms at all."
Oh man, what an amazing and honest answer. Saying "If I didn't give a shit about Nintendo's future, I'd consider it" takes balls.
 

Drauger

New member
Dec 22, 2011
190
0
0
Well I have been hoping this to hapen since the N64 fiasco, yeah I know lots of people liked it but , I hated it I waited like a good fan boy for 2 years, bought it and regret about waiting 2 years for that piece of crap and ended buying a PSX, back to topic I really hope Nintendo went ahead and start developing for PS4( let's face it, Xbone is dead in Japan so there's no chance of that happening.) that way I wouldn't had to buy their st00pid consoles to play Zelda, Metroid, Nintendo ect.......
 

Dark Knifer

New member
May 12, 2009
4,467
0
0
Yeah, we knew that. Just please make something interesting happen on any of your consoles. The new pokemon looks a bit like that with the mega evolutions, do more risky stuff, let me have fun playing your games again.
 

Tradjus

New member
Apr 25, 2011
273
0
0
Translation for you guys:
"Satoru Iwata explains why Nintendo will eventually collapse in on itself."
Seriously, as Yahtzee said, "This world is not Nintendo's world anymore."
They need too either adapt or fade away, and it looks like it'll be the latter.
 

Ken_J

New member
Jun 4, 2009
891
0
0
The_Echo said:
Satoru Iwata said:
Nintendo is a company that has never stopped progressing
Progress, yes.

So... how many more times will Mario be fighting Bowser? Link fighting Ganon[dorf]? Samus fighting Ridley?
That is not the point of progress they talk about. Nintendo is not a company you go to for story. They have some good ones like MOTHER and Fire Emblem. But in terms of progress they lead the charge in terms of gameplay and technology.
 

Ken_J

New member
Jun 4, 2009
891
0
0
MrHide-Patten said:
I can see why they would hold onto their Franchises because without them, why would anyone buy a Wii-U? Seriously, why?
It goes to that Progress comment in the main article. Nintendo has made MASSIVE strides in terms of gameplay and technology. But that progress leaves the other game developers somewhat dumbfounded. With the Wii-mote and Second DS screen developers outside of Nintendo had no Idea what the hell to do. With a standard touchscreen gamepad unlike the peripheral ones on the PS4 and XBOne the Wii U can have some truely unique titles once developers wrap there head around the technology.
 

Ken_J

New member
Jun 4, 2009
891
0
0
Adon Cabre said:
WeepingAngels said:
Where did this nonsense start? Why do people expect Nintendo to make games for competing consoles? Is anyone suggesting that Microsoft put Halo on the PS3/4 or the Wii U?
Because Nintendo's 2 major exclusive franchises, and which come every few years, are the only ones that sell into the 10's of millions -- it's not enough, and its why they jumped ship with the Wii.

Microsoft and SONY have Third Party Support. Nintendo Wii U does not, at all. Just look at their sales figures for Assassin's Creed III and Call of Duty, which were marketed for the Wii U -- abysmal numbers. How they conceived a Wii U launch without a franchise title attached is beyond my understanding.
New Super Mario Bros U. I know it's smaller than say the big 3D Zelda or Mario but it is as Mario as Mario gets.

Also Nintendo really hits it home with Second Party titles rather that the untamable beast the is the Third Party. Rare (once upon a time), Retro, Gamefreak. those guys. And for some current events, Possible Atlus.

Link: http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2013/07/rumour_nintendo_is_shaping_up_to_acquire_troubled_atlus
 

oldtaku

New member
Jan 7, 2011
639
0
0
It's a reasonable strategy - if you could get Miyamoto games on another platform there would be no reason whatsoever to buy a Nintendo console. And that's been true since at least N64.
 

The_Echo

New member
Mar 18, 2009
3,251
0
0
Ken_J said:
That is not the point of progress they talk about. Nintendo is not a company you go to for story. They have some good ones like MOTHER and Fire Emblem. But in terms of progress they lead the charge in terms of gameplay and technology.
In recent years, that progress tends to be gameplay mechanics and tech that very few beyond Nintendo themselves are actually using...

So I think they might want to start thinking about progress in their IPs. Namely, letting them change the formula of the old ones... and getting new ones. Especially with how poorly the Wii U is doing. They need progress in software, not hardware.
 

Roofstone

New member
May 13, 2010
1,641
0
0
Well that is fair enough, when you own your own console. No reason for them to develop for others really.

Catchpa: "do you love me?" ...Bit creepy there, catchpa, bit creepy.
 

SerBrittanicus

New member
Jul 22, 2013
68
0
0
RJ 17 said:
I mean, it's never a good sign when you're forced to sell your next-gen console at a loss in order to help make it appealing.
Why do you think that? Both the Xbox 360 and the PS3 were sold at massive losses to make them appealing and the same will be true for the Xbox one and the PS4. The whole idea is that you sell the console at a loss and then make all your money back from selling games and whatnot, which both Nintendo and Sony have excellent positions for since they have so many exclusives. I haven't really played any Nintendo games since the gamecube, but it strikes me as being very stupid to suddenly put all their games on their competitors consoles.
 

Teoes

Poof, poof, sparkles!
Jun 1, 2010
5,173
0
0
Nice, direct statement - seemed somewhat un-Japanese, really, being so direct and unambiguous as that.

Also I looked at the picture and thought "just off-camera: Lisa Foiles".
 

RandV80

New member
Oct 1, 2009
1,506
0
0
I'm usually a pleasant person but this is one area where I feel like telling people to **** off. Nintendo makes there games for their Nintendo console, who knows what the long term future may hold but in the more immediate there's 0 chance of any of their first party games going finding their way to Sony or Microsoft.

Two things to note here. First, the article states that Nintendo is not making much money on the Wii-U, so they should port there games to the competitors to make up for it... exactly what games would those be? The primary reason the Wii-U is doing poorly right now is because Nintendo doesn't have many of their big games out yet. Once those games out Wii-U's will start selling, and Nintendo has never had a problem selling their big games. To suggest that they'd be better off releasing them to on a competing console is outright laughable, as with poor 3rd party support that's the only incentive to buy a Nintendo console which you'll be tossing out the window.

Second, and this is a very simply concept that people over look, Nintendo's weaker hardware consoles is perfectly adequate for playing Nintendo games. You don't need 8 GB of RAM and whatever ultra high end graphics card to play a Mario or Zelda game, developing them on a PS4 will net you pretty much zero improvements.
 

O maestre

New member
Nov 19, 2008
882
0
0
is this really news? I mean i can honestly not remember Nintendo ever developing for another companies hardware. This doesn't bother me, after all I will never buy a Nintendo console.
 

Adon Cabre

New member
Jun 14, 2012
223
0
0
Ken_J said:
Adon Cabre said:
WeepingAngels said:
Where did this nonsense start? Why do people expect Nintendo to make games for competing consoles? Is anyone suggesting that Microsoft put Halo on the PS3/4 or the Wii U?
Because Nintendo's 2 major exclusive franchises, and which come every few years, are the only ones that sell into the 10's of millions -- it's not enough, and its why they jumped ship with the Wii.

Microsoft and SONY have Third Party Support. Nintendo Wii U does not, at all. Just look at their sales figures for Assassin's Creed III and Call of Duty, which were marketed for the Wii U -- abysmal numbers. How they conceived a Wii U launch without a franchise title attached is beyond my understanding.
New Super Mario Bros U. I know it's smaller than say the big 3D Zelda or Mario but it is as Mario as Mario gets.

Also Nintendo really hits it home with Second Party titles rather that the untamable beast the is the Third Party. Rare (once upon a time), Retro, Gamefreak. those guys. And for some current events, Possible Atlus.

Link: http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2013/07/rumour_nintendo_is_shaping_up_to_acquire_troubled_atlus
I want them to make it; Nintendo so contrasts that hyper-realism saturated into today's markets; but their own hardware, like the Playstation 3, seems to be the problem.

Unfortunately, this 2013.
 

Danceofmasks

New member
Jul 16, 2010
1,511
0
0
Dear Nintendo,

Just release more games already. The 3DS is finally coming good, with a bunch of great games to play, but the WiiU still sucks donkey penis.
'cos it has nothing worth playing.

With how slow you guys are at making games, it's a good thing you're not making games for other platforms ... 'cos then we'd never get to play anything at all.
 

Mobax

New member
Oct 10, 2012
51
0
0
WeepingAngels said:
Where did this nonsense start? Why do people expect Nintendo to make games for competing consoles? Is anyone suggesting that Microsoft put Halo on the PS3/4 or the Wii U?
Exactly, Nintendo's ip IS their brand. What Master Chief is to xbox, Mario is to Nintendo 10 fold. Nintendo knows they need to remain exclusive on their ip as a way to encourage sales of their consoles. If the Wii U sank with mario and co. why would it sell better if you could play those games on PC, PS or xbox? You don't see Disney selling Mickey Mouse to Warner Brothers and you don't see Warner Brothers selling Bugs Bunny, partly for tradition, mostly for dollars and cents.
 

Sigmund Av Volsung

Hella noided
Dec 11, 2009
2,998
0
0

At least why they fail to me, personally.

They know that everyone would love for their Mario, Zelda, Metroid(would be so awesome on PC(the 3D FPS ones)) etc. to end up on other platforms.

But given the WiiU's current position, it's understandable that Iwata would say this.
 

Doom972

New member
Dec 25, 2008
2,311
0
0
It seems like the opposite to me. In the short term, they would lose money because they would have to sell their console based on its own merits, which means a failure for the WiiU. In the long run, they would make much greater profit from the copies sold on other platforms.
 

Winnosh

New member
Sep 23, 2010
492
0
0
One word for you 'POKEMON'

Nintendo owns Pokemon They don't need to even think about doing anything else even. Hell If they make a Pokemon MMO on the Wii U then consider the console war over.