If I'm spreading ignoranace, you're spreading tons more of it than I am. Everything I've said has been 100% correct, and Blizzard, as of YET, has yet to be compromised. Trying to say I and they are lying despite all evidence to the contrary is ludicrous. Also Blizzard obviously doesn't have lax security or authenticators wouldn't work.zefiris said:You clearly have no idea what a conspiracy is. The word you're looking for is corruption, not conspiracy.Eri said:5Well you've already decided it's all a big conspiracy that Blizzard's involved in.
And, uhm, if you know anything about business, you'd know it's far more common than most people are comfortable to admit.
You yourself are a part of the problem. You are lying to defend a company, without having any idea whatsoever if your white knighting has any merit - you don't even know the CONCEPT of what you are talking about and are apparently completely ignorant about corruption existing. And you are spreading your ignorance.
This is why companies get away with lax security in the first place. So good work. Your behavior makes it so there is no need for a conspiracy - just generic corruption. A blizzard employer selling a few user names is completely risk free. They will never be caught. How could they? At the end the user will be blamed, because it is impossible to prove that an user didn't have lax security in some way.
Edit: Obviously, user security is still at fault for most account compromises. It's never hacking, because you cannot brute-force a game (unless the game has no delay between attempts, in which case the company would be 100% at fault). It's likely something like 30% keyloggers, 65-69% phishing, and 1-5% Blizzard's fault.
AND even if, by some miracle, some employee was corrupt enough to sell accounts for a piddly amount of money, having an authenticator would thwart that as well, so just another reason to get one.