Even for open world games it can work out just fine. They managed just fine with Just Cause 2, so I have to agree that it's less inability to make one and more unwilling to make one.Andy Chalk said:Demos are quite possible for RPGs that are more scripted and linear. The demo for Ultima Underworld, for instance, offered the complete first floor of the dungeon, including exits to the second level, at which point it ended. It was fantastic, and it got me incredibly psyched for the game.
Bethesda could put out a demo for this thing and it'd be fine. It wouldn't show off the huge, wide-open exploration opportunities of the real game but a mid-sized dungeon would show off its capabilities, give PC gamers a chance to see how it runs on their systems (an important part of any demo) and get us wound up for 11/11/11. I don't think it's a "can't" situation so much as simply "can't be bothered," but at the same time we all know by now what we're in for with an Elder Scrolls game, so I really don't see it as a very important issue either way.
But the least they could do is make some sort of benchmarking tool. It's a cutting edge game, and we all know what Bethesda is like. Don't leave your PC fans in the dark! I want to know whether I should pre-order it for my PC or my PS3.
Which is only a very broad and mostly useless tool. It's really not that accurate. For example, according to SRL my old computer could not run Far Cry 2 on it's minimal settings. I ran it flawlessy on High settings. At the same time GTA4 should run perfectly fine on my new rig, yet it still struggles when I max everything out.Bobzer77 said:This will likely have Skyrim day one (or sooner).
http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyri/
Or you could read the system requirements...
It's a nice tool if you just doubt whether your PC will meet the recommended or minimal specs because it's not that good of a machine, but it's rather useless when it comes to things like optimisation and bugs, the latter being of particular interest when Bethesda's involved.