psych0r3bel said:
I see. So what you're saying is, let's go around and enforce a generally accepted means of conduct onto people by threatening them with removal of something they legitimately obtained. What if I were a mod on EA forums, and you were a poster, and I found out somehow that you bought a game from Activision, and there was a clause about supporting rival publishers openly. What if I decided to ban you from the forums and consequently all your EA games because you happened to buy that one other game?
IF that was clause in the agreement? Then yes.
Which is why I would not be on those forums, and why I don't buy games online.
psych0r3bel said:
Oh, and let's apply your logic to real life. I don't like something you said because it hurts my feelings and I'm a cop. So I throw your ass in jail and deny you your freedom for 72 hours because you said "ass" in my general direction. See where I'm going with this?
Um, cops CAN do that. Not for 72 hours, but for 24 hours. That is why you never give a cop the finger, or call them pigs, or anything like that. It is completely within their rights to arrest you and hold you for 24 hours.
psych0r3bel said:
But that's fine, I don't mean to berate you for your opinion, I just simply wish to reveal the flaws in your view.
There are no flaws in my opinion. You just don't agree with it.
psych0r3bel said:
tl;dr, there's such a thing as abuse of power, and people are dicks.
And I say it wasn't an abuse of power - is was power properly and justly used to punish someone who deserved it.
While I acknowledge that you have your opinion, it is not mine. I shared my opinion on a forum - I have no problem with what EA did - and you are telling me that my opinion is wrong. You can disagree with my opinion, and you can try to convince me otherwise (you have not, but you can try) but saying that my opinion is wrong is rather presumptive on your part.