You're welcome for the lolz!Kenjitsuka said:Figured this wasn't going to be very good, but it was great actually!
When Chris is pissed/passionate he get's seriously funny.
Best episode in a LONG time, thanks for the lolz!!!
You're welcome for the lolz!Kenjitsuka said:Figured this wasn't going to be very good, but it was great actually!
When Chris is pissed/passionate he get's seriously funny.
Best episode in a LONG time, thanks for the lolz!!!
That was my reaction too. At first I was all "Oh, you did not!" but then I realized which one they were talking about and it was all good.Lvl 64 Klutz said:KYLE YOU ALMOST GAVE ME A HEART ATTACK!!
I saw the "vs." screen and thought "Are they going to argue Rise of the Planet of the Apes was a bad movie!? Inconceivable!" Thankfully, I breathed a huge sigh of relief when it turned out to be the reboot I forgot even happened.
Now to watch the rest of this episode.
Why don't we just say the Star Trek reboot PERIOD.Newhouse said:Star Trek Into Darkness.
1) Star Trek II did not need to be rebooted. At all. Ever. You can argue that Into Darkness is not a reboot of Wrath of Khan and I would agree untill the last 30-45 minutes of the movie when it decides, "welp we got nothing here's Wrath of Khan with the equivalent of an M. Night Shamylan twist"
2) Missed the whole point of Kirk learning that he is not invincible and the weight of having Spock die, to be replaced by "Opp Kirks only dead for 5-10 minutes" Also defeats the whole point of the Star Trek reboot period if we're going to keep calling up Old Spock every time there's a problem.
3) Portable transporter and "cure all" blood.
I couldn't agree more. Honestly thought the rewrite of a lot of the original movie's most iconic moments crosses the line into parody well before they "catch" Khan. Hell, the movie's opening has Spock paradoxically speaking out about not violating the Prime Directive while violating the pri-canadamus_prime said:Why don't we just say the Star Trek reboot PERIOD.Newhouse said:Star Trek Into Darkness.
1) Star Trek II did not need to be rebooted. At all. Ever. You can argue that Into Darkness is not a reboot of Wrath of Khan and I would agree untill the last 30-45 minutes of the movie when it decides, "welp we got nothing here's Wrath of Khan with the equivalent of an M. Night Shamylan twist"
2) Missed the whole point of Kirk learning that he is not invincible and the weight of having Spock die, to be replaced by "Opp Kirks only dead for 5-10 minutes" Also defeats the whole point of the Star Trek reboot period if we're going to keep calling up Old Spock every time there's a problem.
3) Portable transporter and "cure all" blood.
Of course I meant the entire J.J. Abrams Star Trek reboot universe not just Into Darkness, but yeah that was pretty bad. I mean should I go over all the things about the first one that didn't make sense? Starting with Red Matter, a plot device that presumably was pulled out of somebody's ass, Abrams' I'm guessing.Icehearted said:I couldn't agree more. Honestly thought the rewrite of a lot of the original movie's most iconic moments crosses the line into parody well before they "catch" Khan. Hell, the movie's opening has Spock paradoxically speaking out about not violating the Prime Directive while violating the pri-canadamus_prime said:Why don't we just say the Star Trek reboot PERIOD.Newhouse said:Star Trek Into Darkness.
1) Star Trek II did not need to be rebooted. At all. Ever. You can argue that Into Darkness is not a reboot of Wrath of Khan and I would agree untill the last 30-45 minutes of the movie when it decides, "welp we got nothing here's Wrath of Khan with the equivalent of an M. Night Shamylan twist"
2) Missed the whole point of Kirk learning that he is not invincible and the weight of having Spock die, to be replaced by "Opp Kirks only dead for 5-10 minutes" Also defeats the whole point of the Star Trek reboot period if we're going to keep calling up Old Spock every time there's a problem.
3) Portable transporter and "cure all" blood.
*flips table*
*leaves room*
If you're going to go the route of cartoon reboots, even though it wasn't technically a reboot Season 3 of Gargoyles sure as hell felt like one. A bad one. One so bad I've edited it out of my memory except that it is a thing that exists somewhere in the netherworld of TV-land. Or how when Doug's production company was bought by Disney and put on ABC it wasn't even close to what made that cartoon fun. That and Billy West decided not to return which we all know Billy "Phillip J. Fry" West is awesome and NOT having him return is bad for business.rayen020 said:Watched 20 minutes of Planet of the Apes, said "Done!"
what about TV reboots? I really think Ultimate Spiderman deserves some face stomps. still can't believe they canceled spectacular spiderman for that crap.
Even though it was more like the source material and did the opposite of stopping the franchise in its tracks?SilverUchiha said:I'm voting for Amazing Spiderman
Or, and I'm just speculating here, they've read a Spider-Man comic in the main universe in the last....30 years.Mr. Omega said:In ASM, they made him a variation of "the chosen one", showing the people who made this movie do not get the point of Spider-Man.
You know what I hated most of all, honestly?Newhouse said:Star Trek Into Darkness.
This has been a speculation point since the announcement, so I'm surprised you haven't heard it before.Waaghpowa said:Chris actually brought up a good point that I never thought of before about Superman. Although I don't like either movie they talked about in the video, part of what failed with Superman is that they couldn't come up with a competent sequel without putting Batman in it.
Do they have no faith that a sequel will do well after the first one without putting Batman in it?
Granted, this is DC and, well, it's DC. So who knows?