No Right Answer: Worst Reboot Ever

Firefilm

New member
May 27, 2011
1,801
0
0
Kenjitsuka said:
Figured this wasn't going to be very good, but it was great actually!
When Chris is pissed/passionate he get's seriously funny.

Best episode in a LONG time, thanks for the lolz!!! :D
You're welcome for the lolz!
 

rayen020

New member
May 20, 2009
1,138
0
0
Watched 20 minutes of Planet of the Apes, said "Done!"

what about TV reboots? I really think Ultimate Spiderman deserves some face stomps. still can't believe they canceled spectacular spiderman for that crap.
 

TakerFoxx

Elite Member
Jan 27, 2011
1,125
0
41
Lvl 64 Klutz said:
KYLE YOU ALMOST GAVE ME A HEART ATTACK!!

I saw the "vs." screen and thought "Are they going to argue Rise of the Planet of the Apes was a bad movie!? Inconceivable!" Thankfully, I breathed a huge sigh of relief when it turned out to be the reboot I forgot even happened.

Now to watch the rest of this episode.
That was my reaction too. At first I was all "Oh, you did not!" but then I realized which one they were talking about and it was all good.
 

Stryc9

Elite Member
Nov 12, 2008
1,294
0
41
Planet of the Apes was terrible but Mars Attacks! was pretty damn good for a movie based on trading cards from the 60s.
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
Newhouse said:
Star Trek Into Darkness.

1) Star Trek II did not need to be rebooted. At all. Ever. You can argue that Into Darkness is not a reboot of Wrath of Khan and I would agree untill the last 30-45 minutes of the movie when it decides, "welp we got nothing here's Wrath of Khan with the equivalent of an M. Night Shamylan twist"

2) Missed the whole point of Kirk learning that he is not invincible and the weight of having Spock die, to be replaced by "Opp Kirks only dead for 5-10 minutes" Also defeats the whole point of the Star Trek reboot period if we're going to keep calling up Old Spock every time there's a problem.

3) Portable transporter and "cure all" blood.
Why don't we just say the Star Trek reboot PERIOD.
 

leviadragon99

New member
Jun 17, 2010
1,055
0
0
With Regards to Tim Burton and franchises... I think he did alright with the two Batman movies he helmed.

I mean Hollywood has had something of a patchy record with Batman movies, Schumacher's two embraced the camp angle, which is good for anyone interested in that aspect, not so good for those not, and Nolan's Batman movies kinda started losing steam and limping the longer they went on.

And hell, all of them have had occasional script issues to a greater or lesser extent, the odd plot hole or head-scratching moment.
 

Rangerboy87

New member
Jul 1, 2011
182
0
0
Congrats, Chris!!

Speaking as a father of an almost 6 month old, there is nothing else like it (both good and bad). It will change your world forever, as I'm sure Dan could tell you. Best of luck to you.
 

Darth_Payn

New member
Aug 5, 2009
2,868
0
0
For a second there, I was expecting Bob to butt in and take over on the anti-Man-of-Steel hate. Good thing Burton's Planet of the Apes won (if you call that winning). For my money, one lousy reboot was Aliens vs. Predator. That one messed up 2 franchises for the price of one!
 

Icehearted

New member
Jul 14, 2009
2,081
0
0
I hated both reboots, but definitely hated Planet of the Apees mroe. It's so bad I actually did only see it once and forgot it existed to the point that I thought this was about Rise with Franco, which confused me because that one was actually pretty good.

canadamus_prime said:
Newhouse said:
Star Trek Into Darkness.

1) Star Trek II did not need to be rebooted. At all. Ever. You can argue that Into Darkness is not a reboot of Wrath of Khan and I would agree untill the last 30-45 minutes of the movie when it decides, "welp we got nothing here's Wrath of Khan with the equivalent of an M. Night Shamylan twist"

2) Missed the whole point of Kirk learning that he is not invincible and the weight of having Spock die, to be replaced by "Opp Kirks only dead for 5-10 minutes" Also defeats the whole point of the Star Trek reboot period if we're going to keep calling up Old Spock every time there's a problem.

3) Portable transporter and "cure all" blood.
Why don't we just say the Star Trek reboot PERIOD.
I couldn't agree more. Honestly thought the rewrite of a lot of the original movie's most iconic moments crosses the line into parody well before they "catch" Khan. Hell, the movie's opening has Spock paradoxically speaking out about not violating the Prime Directive while violating the pri-

*flips table*
*leaves room*
 

Ruisu

Enjoy the Silence
Jul 11, 2013
190
0
0
I actually loved Man of Steel, and agree that Burton's planet of the apes was way too weird and just did not work.
I never though it was a reboot though, just a random planet of the apes movie unrelated to the previous.
 

FPLOON

Your #1 Source for the Dino Porn
Jul 10, 2013
12,531
0
0
"Man of Steel 2 directed by Tim Burton!"

I'd watch that for a dollar!!

OT: I was never on board with reboots to begin with... and, so far, only Rise has been the only "reboot" that was worth watching in the theaters, based on my theater-viewing years...
 

Kaisius

New member
Dec 6, 2010
15
0
0
Clearly the fix is in. Man of Steel was the worse of two for one very simple fact: No one gave or gives a damn about "Apes". 40 some odd years ago, yeah, "Apes" was a going concern. Now(well,2001), though?
 

Boogie Knight

New member
Oct 17, 2011
115
0
0
Of the two, Planet of the Apes suffered from heavy handed nonsense, like when the evil general ape borrowed a Barry Goldwater quote out of context, Yet, it had this weird aesthetic that made it fun to watch as long as you didn't make yourself listen to it.

Man of Steel's problems begin and end with WB trying to recreate the same money printing machine which was The Dark Knight by tacking on the same gloomy sensibilities onto Superman.

However, Robocop sucks Roboballs. The whole movie hinges on, and falls apart, by not having Murphy die and be resurrected as a machine. Then he spends a big chunk of the movie with him not being Robocop and not doing Robocop stuff. I didn't think the movie could meet what I wanted from a reboot, but it was just sooooo boooooriiiing!!
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
Icehearted said:
canadamus_prime said:
Newhouse said:
Star Trek Into Darkness.

1) Star Trek II did not need to be rebooted. At all. Ever. You can argue that Into Darkness is not a reboot of Wrath of Khan and I would agree untill the last 30-45 minutes of the movie when it decides, "welp we got nothing here's Wrath of Khan with the equivalent of an M. Night Shamylan twist"

2) Missed the whole point of Kirk learning that he is not invincible and the weight of having Spock die, to be replaced by "Opp Kirks only dead for 5-10 minutes" Also defeats the whole point of the Star Trek reboot period if we're going to keep calling up Old Spock every time there's a problem.

3) Portable transporter and "cure all" blood.
Why don't we just say the Star Trek reboot PERIOD.
I couldn't agree more. Honestly thought the rewrite of a lot of the original movie's most iconic moments crosses the line into parody well before they "catch" Khan. Hell, the movie's opening has Spock paradoxically speaking out about not violating the Prime Directive while violating the pri-

*flips table*
*leaves room*
Of course I meant the entire J.J. Abrams Star Trek reboot universe not just Into Darkness, but yeah that was pretty bad. I mean should I go over all the things about the first one that didn't make sense? Starting with Red Matter, a plot device that presumably was pulled out of somebody's ass, Abrams' I'm guessing.
 

Imperioratorex Caprae

Henchgoat Emperor
May 15, 2010
5,499
0
0
rayen020 said:
Watched 20 minutes of Planet of the Apes, said "Done!"

what about TV reboots? I really think Ultimate Spiderman deserves some face stomps. still can't believe they canceled spectacular spiderman for that crap.
If you're going to go the route of cartoon reboots, even though it wasn't technically a reboot Season 3 of Gargoyles sure as hell felt like one. A bad one. One so bad I've edited it out of my memory except that it is a thing that exists somewhere in the netherworld of TV-land. Or how when Doug's production company was bought by Disney and put on ABC it wasn't even close to what made that cartoon fun. That and Billy West decided not to return which we all know Billy "Phillip J. Fry" West is awesome and NOT having him return is bad for business.
 

Waaghpowa

Needs more Dakka
Apr 13, 2010
3,073
0
0
Chris actually brought up a good point that I never thought of before about Superman. Although I don't like either movie they talked about in the video, part of what failed with Superman is that they couldn't come up with a competent sequel without putting Batman in it.

Do they have no faith that a sequel will do well after the first one without putting Batman in it?

Granted, this is DC and, well, it's DC. So who knows?
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Between the two, I'd have to go with POTA. I'm not FOND of MOS, but it was still...Ugh....Better.

SilverUchiha said:
I'm voting for Amazing Spiderman
Even though it was more like the source material and did the opposite of stopping the franchise in its tracks?

Mr. Omega said:
In ASM, they made him a variation of "the chosen one", showing the people who made this movie do not get the point of Spider-Man.
Or, and I'm just speculating here, they've read a Spider-Man comic in the main universe in the last....30 years.

Newhouse said:
Star Trek Into Darkness.
You know what I hated most of all, honestly?

Oh my God, they couldn't make up their freaking minds! Did they want to remake Star Trek 2 or not? They seemed simultaneously to be afraid to remake WOK and afraid not to make WOK. A lot of the playing with expectations only work if you're a Trek fan, and if you are, it's probably going to play out as inferior. And I thought Kirk was still going to have that learning moment, but nooooooooooo!

However, The Star Trek reboots have probably given the franchise the shot in the arm it needs to return to regular rotation, so I'd say it's pretty much the opposite of the criteria they set out.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go was the taste of defending MOS out of my mouth.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Waaghpowa said:
Chris actually brought up a good point that I never thought of before about Superman. Although I don't like either movie they talked about in the video, part of what failed with Superman is that they couldn't come up with a competent sequel without putting Batman in it.

Do they have no faith that a sequel will do well after the first one without putting Batman in it?

Granted, this is DC and, well, it's DC. So who knows?
This has been a speculation point since the announcement, so I'm surprised you haven't heard it before.

However, keep in mind that this idea had been promoted before the new Superman. In fact, the idea had been floated surrounding the Superman Returns continuity. They even teased it with a similar icon deal as the current one.
 

Ratty

New member
Jan 21, 2014
848
0
0
I think I'm one of the few hardcore fans of the original Planet of the Apes series who doesn't really mind the 2001 "re-imagining". It was bad yeah (Even Marky Mark thought so. [http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Mark-Wahlberg-Discusses-Why-His-Planet-Apes-Movie-Didn-t-Work-28577.html]) but I didn't find it personally offensive. At least they tried something different rather than attempting to outdo the original at its own game, because that was never going to happen. And hey, the make up looks great.

I absolutely agree that they should stop giving reboots to Burton. It feels like he ran out of ideas 15 years ago and is increasingly just taking the piss.
Also Batman Returns was bad, go back and watch it. It's just... bad.

Not sure what the worst remake/reboot etc. is. But I know Rob Zombie's Halloween couldn't possibly have missed the point and appeal of Micheal Myers any harder. So I guess I'll go with that until someone inevitably remakes A Clockwork Orange in the mold of Twilight or something..