Deshara said:And nothing of value was lost.
Condor219 said:Agreed.Deshara said:And nothing of value was lost.
But why was World of Warcraft pulled? I can see why they'd stop selling violent shooters concurrent with what actually happened, but how is that relevant, even if he used it as a "cover story"?
Stealthygamer said:In my honest opinion CSS is the only good game there, and its much cheaper to get it off steam
gmaverick019 said:haha first comment, QFTDeshara said:And nothing of value was lost.
I wasn't sure if it was appropriate to think such..but it seems quite a few agree.
teh_Canape said:what are you talking about?Deshara said:And nothing of value was lost.
Counter Strike: Source is awesome
DaHero said:A multiplayer only quickscoping ego tournament...Stealthygamer said:In my honest opinion CSS is the only good game there, and its much cheaper to get it off steam
Nope, nothing of value was lost to the industry.
InsomniJack said:Ditto.Deshara said:And nothing of value was lost.
Well, except for Homefront.
Slightly.
The Lugz said:This, concise, precise.Deshara said:And nothing of value was lost.
honestly though, these games are just killing simulators and provide little to nothing to stimulate the brain, is it any bad thing if they are resigned to the scrap heap?
Roboto said:You /thread ed on the first post. Well played indeed.Deshara said:And nothing of value was lost.
If only we could get these games pulled in the states, innovation explosion shall occureth!
Stilkon said:Pretty accurate statement right here.Deshara said:And nothing of value was lost.
You guys ARE joking, right?ElPatron said:I want to know about Bobby Kotick's reaction.
But I agree, nothing of value was lost.
spectrenihlus said:First they came for the Call of Duty but I did nothing for I hated that game...Deshara said:And nothing of value was lost.
Should they pull water too, because he couldn't have done this without water. Video games don't train you to kill people, Penn and Teller pretty much debunked this.lacktheknack said:How dare they show basic respect to the families of the victims.ImprovizoR said:Those retailers are morons. And that's just putting it mildly.
If he had claimed that he read a book before killing your child, it doesn't matter how accurate the statement is, you'd be glad and comforted that the local bookstores pulled the book from shelves, even if only temporarily.
I don't give a damn how "calm and reasoned" you think you are (as evident in "the retailers are morons"), if you lost your child, you'd feel damn good about the killer's manifesto being thwarted in some way.
My captcha is "norwegian cruise line"...