Yes, but I think you are going too far saying that is homophobic.GrandmaFunk said:of course it's homophobic, it's exact meaning is "please don't think i am homosexual despite what i've just said/written".Treblaine said:"no homo"
Didn't know that was homophobic. It's simply the gay version of "that's what she said" only with sexual innuendo of the homoerotic nature.
this not only implies that homosexuality is wrong but also that certain comments/opinions could only be made by a homosexual.
Would it also be homophobic to say:
"I'm straight" as that also literally means: "please don't think i am homosexual"
There is a difference between "I'm embarrassed of people assuming I am something that I am not due to innuendo" and "all homosexuals should be ashamed of what they are". The latter is homophobia. Homophobia is fear of being around homosexuals, that your relatives might be homosexual or that they are somehow contagious or are some kind of threat.
And there are so many humorous ways to use No-Homo that NORMALIZE homosexuality, like say a fan of uncharted who really loves Nathan Drake as a character they write a story like:
"I'm imagining the awesome adventures we have together finding treasure, meeting hot chicks, fighting terrorists and having sex (no homo)"
The pun is in how the "having sex" is it could either be worth women they meet or with each other, the No-Homo just draws attention to that yet clarifies the stance of the author. The author could have explicitly phrased it "and each of us having sex with women we meet" but adding no-homo is makes it a joke.
But what this REALLY does is takes away the shock value of homosexuality, the thing that homophobes exploit in "its jerst wrong!". In British comedy there is loads of gay humour with characters cross dressing, same-sex innuendo and dramatic ironic romance. Most of the time the straight-guy is at the butt of the joke for being clueless and losing his cool, the characters immune are the ones who roll with it and clue in on what is going on. And as a result Britain is far more gay friendly than say America's Deep South. It's familiar, we see how common it is and so we realise that it is no problem at all (or the only problem comes from persecution).
I've heard the kind of jokes about gays in the deep south, they are universally cruel and the gay man is the butt of the joke for being gay.
"no-Homo" jokes are inherently at the expense of hetero-characters playing around with their role, and a lot more nuanced in how compact they are it plays out two scenarios of going with and going against the gay scenario.
One thing this dodges is the Smithers' Denial, the most famous fictional gay character is infamously in the closet he ALWAYS denies being gay as of course he would as he's in the closet though totally unconvincingly. So simply saying "I'm not gay" just makes people think "well, that's what a closeted gay person WOULD say". And that's the Smithers routine.
Now realise if they were REALLY homophobic, they would never allow any question of their sexuality, because that is what the "No-homo" line is, "ha ha, sound like I'm gay, oh but I'm just playing". This shows a willing to allow others to think of their actions in the gay way without them getting the wrong idea they are closeted and hinting of coming out.
Though it can be used in a homophobic way, if it is NOT as a joke but in a wildly over-defensive way for any kind of same-sex interaction. But I rarely see that and it no where near prevalent enough to declare all use of "no-homo" as cruel.