Eric the Orange said:
everythingbeeps said:
The Amazon-bombs are pretty awesome.
Honestly that is the worst thing about all of this. See this guy runs a marketing firm, his company does not actually make the controller. But the company who hired him is getting some of the hate for him being bad at his job. And they do not deserve that. Will they use a different firm from now on? No doubt. But they do not deserve to lose sales because this guy was an ass.
I've been trying to reconcile that in my head, and I just can't. Product A is Product A. It might do things differently than Product B, C, and D, but it's still a product in that line. What makes me choose Product A over B, C, and D is usually my feelings about that Product.
Every hotel has four walls, a bed, and a door. The Bells and whistles are nice, but in the end, how you're treated as a guest will determine if you'll come back again or if it was a nice one stay.
What most people believe is how one facet of a company behaves is somewhat indicative to how the company might behave all together. If they allow this shoddy treatment of the customer, what will happen if, say, you bought the controller and something's wrong with it? Broken out of the box, you didn't get the right product, whatever. If you bought and didn't receive a product, did the company who hired this guy hire someone just like them to bash down all of your requests for fixes? Will you be insulted and dismissed, or will you be treated like a customer should be?
On a tangent that doesn't have to do with what I quoted, I do not get how Dave was a douche. You pay, you get. You don't get, you have the right and frankly the duty to question why. If you guys paid for a burger and didn't get it for two days, are you REALLY going to say 'I'm going to wait for it like a man'? You paid for internet for three months and didn't get it, are you not allowed to ask what's wrong?
I would love to see the pre-order website.