Onlyfans Bans Porn..... sort of

BrawlMan

Lover of beat'em ups.
Legacy
Mar 10, 2016
30,918
12,779
118
Detroit, Michigan
Country
United States of America
Gender
Male

Oh good, I was worried OnlyFans was going to lose credibility after banning porn. Good to see a lying trans-racial scamartist activist sees value in what OF is now doing.
This biatch again? Go the fuck away, already!
 
  • Like
Reactions: SilentPony

Dwarvenhobble

Is on the Gin
May 26, 2020
6,020
668
118
Do you have stocks in major porn studios, or what?
No


It's misogyny. He's upset that the actresses are directly making money for their work rather than just a portion after it's filtered through production companies. At a more basic level, he's also upset that these women are actually in charge of their lives rather than being told what to do.
Then you Avnger for telling everyone how I am and being so very WRONG as per usual should I bother to expect an actual reply or will you be doing you normal of just vanshing away once called out again.

You know it really does suggest a level of projection going on that based on your post
1) You don't seem to think women who are in charge of their lives would choose porn. Funny when there was literally a Nintendo America staff member and host on Treehouse who lost her job because she was choosing to moonlight doing porn.
2) You don't think women have any control in porn or at studios unless solo.

Get back to me when Onlyfans is producing some higher quality stuff and is not merely being a site for incels in self denial to simp over girls who have no real interest in them beyond what they can get out of them financially. Oh and before I get any crap for saying even that, I have spoken to people who do OnlyFans conent on less public sites where the public face comes off a bit more.
 

Avnger

Trash Goblin
Legacy
Apr 1, 2016
2,124
1,251
118
Country
United States
Generally I don't reply because:

1. My point has been made, and my view has been shared.
2. Other posters, generally much better at writing than I am, make the same follow-up points that I would have but in a better way.
3. Engaging further is likely to lead to me directly addressing you and not your posts. From experience, that's when the mods tend to step in, and I like being able to post here myself.
4. I don't believe many of your posts are in good faith, and attempting to engage bad-faith posts in long discussions is both a waste of time and an exercise in frustration. I'm, admittedly, not the best with calm posting when frustrated, so we're back to point #3.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kwak and BrawlMan

Dwarvenhobble

Is on the Gin
May 26, 2020
6,020
668
118
Generally I don't reply because:

1. My point has been made, and my view has been shared.
2. Other posters, generally much better at writing than I am, make the same follow-up points that I would have but in a better way.
3. Engaging further is likely to lead to me directly addressing you and not your posts. From experience, that's when the mods tend to step in, and I like being able to post here myself.
4. I don't believe many of your posts are in good faith, and attempting to engage bad-faith posts in long discussions is both a waste of time and an exercise in frustration. I'm, admittedly, not the best with calm posting when frustrated, so we're back to point #3.
So
1. You're not here for back and fourth good faith discussion just to air your views. I thought that's what twitter was for?
2. Not that often at least not linked to your claims and points.
3. so you can't address the points and would have to actually go for pure ad hominem sure ok
4. Maybe that's just projection on your part? If my posts are so bad faith I should be easily destroyed should I not?
 

Dwarvenhobble

Is on the Gin
May 26, 2020
6,020
668
118
Ah, I see the problem. You're objecting to how the market is rewarding Onlyfans vs. (generally) more expensively produced pornography.

Assuming that more expensively produced pornography indeed isn't being consumed in favor of lesser cost alternatives and-- oh, the injustice of it all!-- more deserving pornographers aren't being properly rewarded for their efforts, the liberal market solution is apparent: a generous universal income so that people can afford better porn. Or if you want to very sensibly target what you're after, only let people spend the money on pornography: a universal pornographic income (UPI) or porn stamps. That way, better porn will be affordable and consumed at a rate commensurate with the effort put into producing it. Let the econometricians figure out exactly how much to spend.
"Lower cost alternative"

Well it's hard to get lower than free and some free stuff puts in the work.

I honestly don't know what the best solution would be. Who knows maybe legalise sex work so the people who are blowing however much on Onlyfans content can hire a hooker and have a GFE night once every few months or something instead.

Hell how much do onlyfans models charge isn't it like $20 a month or more. Surely porn isn't that expensive in the USA that a film is more than $20.
 

Revnak

We must imagine Sisyphus horny
Legacy
May 25, 2020
2,944
3,099
118
Country
USA
"Incels bad. Incels giving all their money to girls online just to talk to them good, this couldn't possibly backfire or go wrong in any way"
“State mandated gf guy or state mandated free porn guy?”
“Nono, I’m the market manipulated free porn guy, but for the same reasons of course”

You see why I said you’ve got the same thought process here?
 

Seanchaidh

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 21, 2009
6,053
3,656
118
Country
United States of America
"Lower cost alternative"

Well it's hard to get lower than free and some free stuff puts in the work.
And yet people are paying for Onlyfans content, so apparently there is an edge there which doesn't exist in products which you believe have "put in the work".

I honestly don't know what the best solution would be.
That's not surprising since you don't seem to be articulating anything that is a problem.

Who knows maybe legalise sex work so the people who are blowing however much on Onlyfans content can hire a hooker and have a GFE night once every few months or something instead.
Decriminalize, not legalize. I mean, if you give a single shit what sex workers think, that is.

Wikipedia said:
The decriminalization of sex work is the removal of criminal penalties for sex work (specifically, prostitution).[2] Sex work, the consensual provision of sexual services for money or goods,[3] is criminalized in most countries.[4] Decriminalization is distinct from legalization[5] (also known as the "regulationist" approach).[6]

The decriminalization of sex work is a controversial topic. Advocates of decriminalization argue that removing the criminal sanctions surrounding sex work creates a safer environment for sex workers,[7] and that it helps fight sex trafficking.[8] Opponents of decriminalization argue that it will not prevent trafficking (or even increase trafficking[9]) and could put sex workers at greater risk.[10]

Organizations such as UNAIDS, WHO, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, UNFPA, and the medical journal The Lancet have called on states to decriminalize sex work in the global effort to tackle the HIV/AIDS epidemic and ensure sex workers' access to health services.[11][12][13][14] Almost all organisations run by sex workers themselves around the world favour the decriminalisation of sex work, and it tends to be their main goal.[15][16][17][5][18] The majority of academics in the United Kingdom, the United States and elsewhere also favour decriminalising sex work.[19]
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,575
7,210
118
Country
United States
Decriminalize, not legalize. I mean, if you give a single shit what sex workers think, that is.
Hey, look at that: smaller government, plus trafficking victims could go to the authorities without fear* that they'll be locked up

*beyond the fear any other vulnerable person has of going to the cops in general, I mean
 

Seanchaidh

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 21, 2009
6,053
3,656
118
Country
United States of America
Hey, look at that: smaller government, plus trafficking victims could go to the authorities without fear* that they'll be locked up

*beyond the fear any other vulnerable person has of going to the cops in general, I mean
Conservatives want smaller government except when it would result in a better outcome
 
  • Like
Reactions: crimson5pheonix

Dwarvenhobble

Is on the Gin
May 26, 2020
6,020
668
118
And yet people are paying for Onlyfans content, so apparently there is an edge there which doesn't exist in products which you believe have "put in the work".
Yeh it's called Incels in denial lol Idiots fooled into thinking they have a real connection with the model / models and maybe even a shot with them when in reality the whatsapp messages are read and replied to by some dude called Steve the girl hired specifically to tell guys what they want to hear and keep them paying.


That's not surprising since you don't seem to be articulating anything that is a problem.
Or people don't want to acknowledge maybe there's a problem at all.

Decriminalize, not legalize. I mean, if you give a single shit what sex workers think, that is.
Well yes I'm sure many workers would like to do without the safety regulation in their field too but that's not a good idea so yeh I'll go with legalise.
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,575
7,210
118
Country
United States
Well yes I'm sure many workers would like to do without the safety regulation in their field too but that's not a good idea so yeh I'll go with legalise.
Uhh, standard laws apply to decriminalized industries. Dunno why you think they don't

Unless you're wanting OSHA guidelines on dildo girth or something.
 

Specter Von Baren

Annoying Green Gadfly
Legacy
Aug 25, 2013
5,637
2,859
118
I don't know, send help!
Country
USA
Gender
Cuttlefish
Can someone explain to me why so many people here aren't saying this is a good thing because, "Women being forced to sell their bodies to the gaze of lustful men is misogynistic and a sign of capitalist greed." Or, "Sites like Onlyfans put an expectation on young women that they can only be successful by sexualizing themselves for the male gaze."?

Oh wait, or will you respond with, "These women chose to do this and I am for women's choice." While ignoring all the times other women have said they are ok with something like this and it was argued they were "made that way by a male dominated society." In which case I'd ask again why you aren't celebrating this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dwarvenhobble