He's probably one of the people shown celebrating after the towers fell, they had their moment to troll, now they are super jelly, problem, FAIR?
"bombing the US more"THE_NAMSU said:Can I just say,
the soldiers disposed of his body straight after the kill so the body was not actually shown to the public
You sure it was Bin Laden...?
It's easy to get look a likes and stuff.
Plus you shouldn't celebrate his death, because Al-Qaeda are going to start bombing the US more.
LOL dude i think i love you.thehype097 said:I bet you guys were super pissed when the munchkins sang, "ding dong the witch is dead", in the Wizard of Oz too. Those munchkins were dicks eh?
And words can't describe what i think of you! xDEchetusXe said:Do-do-do. Come on and do the conga.
Do-do-do. It's conga night for sure.
Astalano said:This is one thing I wont argue on...WanderingFool said:None. All are in the wrong.Astalano said:So... what countries would sit around for 100 years and completely rebuild?Mrhappyface 2 said:Well, all America has to do is sit there for another 100 years and rebuild the countries. I can guarantee that will never happen, making America just as much of a "fascist dictotorship" or an equivalent nasty word...Astalano said:There is a time for war, a time to defend yourself. Now that Osama is dead, Americans have to step up and help the countries they destroyed.
quote]
Those countries were either lawless shitholes or fascist dictatorships to begin with. Democracy changed that for the very slight better.
Want to know why the did that? Watch this video: http://crooksandliars.com/2007/08/23/daily-show-three-generations-of-america-to-the-rescueCanid117 said:...
And who flew jet liners into civilian structures? ...
Those terrorists sure did give the united states a reason/excuse/cause to invade Afghanistan, I'm not disputing that. What I am disputing is your assertion that the United States government can not be held responsible for the actions it took following the terrorist attacks.Canid117 said:And who flew jet liners into civilian structures? Therebye giving cause to invade Afghanistan and an excuse to invade Iraq?Silentwindofdoom said:Really? Okay, that would be the men and women of the United States armed forces then, who were sent there by who? That's right, the United States government!Canid117 said:The man who pulls the trigger or pushes the button is the one to blame.
Shit does indeed happen, but when you choose to respond to an action taken by another person the effects of that response are your responsibility, that's why police officers get canned for excessive force and even outright murder, even if they feel it was required.And once again who gave them cause to try and arrest the rapist? Shit happens and good people get hurt sometimes but that does not mean that we should throw bile at the people who try to stop those who would do harm to as many people as they possibly can.
No, but it did remove a government that for all its faults kept a civil war from breaking out. That government also did not attract jihadists from surrounding countries so they could attack american forces driving down the civilian packed streets.Woops! Looks like I mixed you up with a fellow named Azrael the Cat. I am sorry that I misdirected my hate. The United States government still does not pull the trigger on civilians or attack innocent people for shits and giggles.
Civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan are being killed by way of collateral damage as a direct result from NATO combat operations. The civil war which has erupted in Iraq and the bombing of places of business and government in Iraq and Afghanistan are the direct result of the removal of both Saddam and the taliban as stabilizing forces.The civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan are killed by the nutcases who believe that 30 virgins await them in heaven if they blow up a school bus full of toddlers.
One terrorist attack?xdiesp said:What's fun, is that this makes Bush right on all things.
All.
Things.
Torture, kidnappings, 5 wars are now completely legit in face of 1 terrorist attack.
And it's not him saying so.
It's his rival (?).
We've had a lot of near misses though.Plurralbles said:"bombing the US more"THE_NAMSU said:Can I just say,
the soldiers disposed of his body straight after the kill so the body was not actually shown to the public
You sure it was Bin Laden...?
It's easy to get look a likes and stuff.
Plus you shouldn't celebrate his death, because Al-Qaeda are going to start bombing the US more.
Hmm... I'll accept another bombing... they've been quiet for a decade even with their poster child alive.
You my fellow escapist hit this nail right on the head. It is different to celebrate the death of people who's only crime was not believing in your religion than celebrating the mass murderer that killed just because people didn't believe his way.Eri said:Celebrating the deaths of thousands of innocents is not the same as celebrating the death of one mass murderer. End of fucking story.
Considering how eager and willing these radicals supposedly are the actual threat they seem to pose is rather minor. How hard is it for them to fly into some craphole south american country and then infiltrate their way into the states to do some naughty things?JWAN said:We've had a lot of near misses though.Plurralbles said:"bombing the US more"THE_NAMSU said:Can I just say,
the soldiers disposed of his body straight after the kill so the body was not actually shown to the public
You sure it was Bin Laden...?
It's easy to get look a likes and stuff.
Plus you shouldn't celebrate his death, because Al-Qaeda are going to start bombing the US more.
Hmm... I'll accept another bombing... they've been quiet for a decade even with their poster child alive.
The vast majority of civilian deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan were caused by suicide bombers, car bombers and other violence perpetrated by terrorist organizations and not coalition munitions. (I feel I should remind you that the United States was not the only country with attack aircraft in the sky) It should also be noted that Afghanistan is much more stable than Iraq and there is significantly less violence there than in Iraq. As for Iraq it should be noted that this would have occurred any way when Saddam inevitably fell from power. The region isn't stable and it isn't all our fault. Granted the reasons for the Iraq invasion were dubious but once again if you wish to create that thread you are welcome to do so.Kashrlyyk said:Civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan are being killed by way of collateral damage as a direct result from NATO combat operations. The civil war which has erupted in Iraq and the bombing of places of business and government in Iraq and Afghanistan are the direct result of the removal of both Saddam and the taliban as stabilizing forces.The civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan are killed by the nutcases who believe that 30 virgins await them in heaven if they blow up a school bus full of toddlers.
Both Private first class Joe Smith and Muhammed the insurgent carry responsibility for their actions but as does the United States government for kicking these wars off in the first place.
I am well aware of recent world history thank you very much. I think you should take a look at the video again and tell me where it explains why Al Qaeda declared war on the united states. He gives it one sentence and doesn't go in depth. Granted the Daily show is (sadly) more reliable than certain other news stations but it is still a comedy show. The reason Osama Bin Laden declared war on the United States is more or less jealousy on the part of Osama Bin Laden who was furious with the United States for "Taking his place" in helping to defend Saudi Arabia from an Iraqi invasion in the 90s. Osama Bin Laden is to blame for 9/11. He and his associates alone.(it should be noted that we cut ties with him when he declared us to be Satan worshipers who should be slaughtered in the 90s.Kashrlyyk said:Want to know why the did that? Watch this video: http://crooksandliars.com/2007/08/23/daily-show-three-generations-of-america-to-the-rescueCanid117 said:...
And who flew jet liners into civilian structures? ...