I bought my pc 6 months ago for $300 and it runs witcher 2 on ultra. Pcs are cheaper than consoles and more powerful. A refurbished emachines crap computer right now out does an xbox 360. hell last week I bought a laptop on cleanarce at staples for $350. It has a bluray player 4GB ram and nvdia go graphics. It runs games better then my xbox 360.Venats said:And yet, I feel that in spite of whatever power trends may be occurring between consoles and PCs, you're average frat boy/gamer/normal person, isn't going to want to spend the time/money to learn how to upgrade a computer and/or buy a new one every four or five years, whereas they probably won't mind dropping $300-500 every console generation of five to six years.
That is, until desktops become so cheap that they simply begin to become as replaceable as consoles.
I meant in general, although they're still comparing two against one, and I would assume they're making estimates for previous years still, since I've not heard about Steam (or anyone else, as I assume people like D2D and GOG don't either) turning around on their policy to not release the copies they've sold.Satsuki666 said:I am curious as to why they think console sales have peaked and are only going to drop in the future while pc game sales rise. It doesnt really make any sense at all. It seems like a pretty silly to assume console game sales are just going to drop with absolutely no proof of it at all.
If you had taken two seconds to look at the charts you would have seen they did account for digital sales.Woodsey said:Is there any particular reason two platforms are always pitted against one?
Because when its estimated that the majority of sales on the PC are now through digital downloads, which aren't specifically tracked, and you then pit two platforms against another solely on retail sales, its all a bit... retarded.
Well, Steam doesn't have shareholders (just going with them as they're massively in the lead in the market), and if the government figures were so easy to get a hold of then surely we'd have had someone else get information on them from that before.Satsuki666 said:Ya they dont need to tell you the exact number of copies of each game they sold but they have to report their total sales to both shareholders and the government. Neither the numbers of sales for the PC or console are 100% accurate but they are also not completely wrong. I am betting they are both missing large chunks of sales but I doubt that would not really change much.Woodsey said:I meant in general, although they're still comparing two against one, and I would assume they're making estimates for previous years still, since I've not heard about Steam (or anyone else, as I assume people like D2D and GOG don't either) turning around on their policy to not release the copies they've sold.
The issue is in upgrading one vs. the other; the latter case is as simple as buying a new machines. The former? Not so much. Either you have to drop ~the equivalent of a console on GPUs and put it in yourself, which your average mechanically challenge sheeple isn't going to do, or you buy a new box then do a lot of file moving and reinstalling, or moving your HDD... but you'd probably want to upgrade your HDD with the new box.bootz said:I bought my pc 6 months ago for $300 and it runs witcher 2 on ultra. Pcs are cheaper than consoles and more powerful. A refurbished emachines crap computer right now out does an xbox 360. hell last week I bought a laptop on cleanarce at staples for $350. It has a bluray player 4GB ram and nvdia go graphics. It runs games better then my xbox 360.
http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/xps-laptops?c=us&cs=19&l=enMr. Omega said:Can I have a name of this kind of laptop? Or a link to how I could buy one?Fujor said:£400 got my a laptop capable of playing ARMA 2 on high at a great frame rate, no lagging and rapid load times.