Not the first one, of course. After all, if you do nothing but run around picking flowers and screaming about The Patriots and the war economy then you'll get declared a bot in no time flat.Infernai said:Ten bucks says that this Everbloom person is actually Hideo Kojima...or Vash the Stampede.
For that I have only your word. Regardless, you being older or younger holds absolutely no meaning to me.Mazty said:I am older than you therefore I'm your elder.MGlBlaze said:snip
How can we be discussing societies views on something if you've been diagnosed with a disorder which means you will suffer with problems in social interaction? A paraplegic from birth can't talk about the wonders of running...This makes any debate with you entirely futile and irrelevant. This isn't an ad hominem but a hard truth.
Hope you don't mind, Jymm.Jymm said:Everbloom explains a bit more how this all happened:
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/2353107047?page=16 post#302I started her shortly after the xp for gathering thing came out, played her for a few days, got to about 12 or 15 and thought to myself "This is going to take forever, I'll never be the first to do this" and more or less put her on the back burner, she was my collector, I only took her out if I needed stuff for alts, or if I was watching TV on the laptop I would fly around doing archaeolgy.
Totally blown away that I was first, I keep checking this thread waiting to see a "I did this 2 months ago!!" post.
I didn't work at this 24/7 for the last 6 months, once you get the hang of it the XP (especially with rested xp) is awesome.
Im all for nerds wasting their time on wow, I did myself for a few yearsTom Goldman said:and only completed 1 quest by accident when she opened a letter that came in the (virtual) mail. She plans to do it again, but without opening her mail this time.
you cant really beat the game. there is no THE END *roll credits*.Distorted Stu said:Funny i recently thought of games you could beat without killing anything and WoW didnt sprign to mind.
Impressive?
Yet those of us that can run almost invariably never think about it - to us, it's just something we use to get around.Mazty said:If we are discussing the social implications of this action, how can you give an accurate reply based that you have a disorder meaning your understanding of social normality is limited? It's not an ad hominem in any way, shape or form. It's saying that you cannot discuss something you do not understand. I can't discuss Quantum Physics or the intricacies of teenage life in Germany as I have no understanding, or very limited understanding of them. Your disorder means you have problems with social skills meaning you are going to be limited on how you can discuss the social repercussions of actions.MGlBlaze said:For that I have only your word. Regardless, you being older or younger holds absolutely no meaning to me.Mazty said:I am older than you therefore I'm your elder.MGlBlaze said:snip
How can we be discussing societies views on something if you've been diagnosed with a disorder which means you will suffer with problems in social interaction? A paraplegic from birth can't talk about the wonders of running...This makes any debate with you entirely futile and irrelevant. This isn't an ad hominem but a hard truth.
Also; it is Ad Hominem as you have, rather than actually made arguments to defeat my own arguments, immediately pointed to a disorder I have and says that, without any basis whatsoever, renders my points irrelavent.
Also; drawing a simile with someone with a physical disability holds no ground. One could also argue that such an individual can talk about the wonders of running as well, as long as they have the powers of observation.
You also appear to be attempting to distract me from your continuing inability to lay down something concrete which defends your own points or refute mine.
People will do what people do*, I will accept that, but exactly what is wrong with the way the player has chosen to enjoy themselves?And no, don't mention it being repetitive again; some people find repetitive tasks theraputic and people can set their own goals to make things fun.
*Be idiots.
And actually, looking back, another user has been kind enough to pull this from a thread on Blizzard's site;
Hope you don't mind, Jymm.Jymm said:Everbloom explains a bit more how this all happened:
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/2353107047?page=16 post#302I started her shortly after the xp for gathering thing came out, played her for a few days, got to about 12 or 15 and thought to myself "This is going to take forever, I'll never be the first to do this" and more or less put her on the back burner, she was my collector, I only took her out if I needed stuff for alts, or if I was watching TV on the laptop I would fly around doing archaeolgy.
Totally blown away that I was first, I keep checking this thread waiting to see a "I did this 2 months ago!!" post.
I didn't work at this 24/7 for the last 6 months, once you get the hang of it the XP (especially with rested xp) is awesome.
So, since Everbloom is a character that (it seems) was played only occasionally, it seems likely that there were enough breaks and other things in between going on to stop things getting boring as well.
Wait, this changes a few things that I wasn't anticipating. Er... Looks like that argument has kind of gone nowhere. Shit.
Although this does seem to suggest that, like I said, the player probably didn't waste a lot of time doing this. Questions about what you said also still remain; namely, how would this be needless as opposed to anything else in pretty much any game out there? Why is it not possible to find repetitive tasks fun or at least relaxing? Why did you assume this was all done at the expense of everything else?
I have also yet to hear your explanation on why avoiding and getting away from the mobs is easy - as I already explained, I'm not familiar with how a druid plays.
As for the running, my example as meant to be that a paraplegic cannot talk about the wonders of actually physically running as he has never participated in the activity.
What was done was an unnecessary time sink and so monotonous that it would not be conceived as normal behaviour for the average person. The fact that if you engage in extremely repetitive activities is an indicator of disorders goes to show that such actions are not normal.
If the person needed so many items for their accounts, well again this isn't good, as it shows how long they must have been playing WoW for, once again labelling this under the 'nerd' sterotype umbrella, helping to increase the social stigma of WoW.
It's simple, really - some social reactions are rather predictable. Others aren't, but that has nothing to do with me having Asperger's Syndrome. Can the majority of people really say that they understand how any given individual acts or will act? For that matter there are many changes in societal perceptions all over the world, and some things one finds fine another would find unthinkable (The fact that so many Americans are opposed to public health care for some reason comes to mind, though I'm not sure on how that situation has developed).Mazty said:If you have never ran, you can't comment on it. I'm failing to see how you can actually make that more complex than it is.MGlBlaze said:snip
If you have a disorder that causes difficulties in social understanding, how can you comment on the effect an action will have socially?
To use so many resources to get someone to level 85, the person must have been spending an absurd amount of time on WoW, helping reinforce negative sterotypes. Yes I played WoW. I quit when I realised it was extremely monotonous & unchallenging, and therefore boring.
Oh wow you are being rude. Nice to see that credible cherry on the top of your argument.
now what?spartan773 said:To prove it can be done.HerbertTheHamster said:Why would you do that
Seriously