Yup, they're certainly making headway on that part.JaceArveduin said:cursedseishi said:snipOkay, bad word choice. How about we go with "not stupidly volatile to the point of self combustion"?Kargathia said:snip
I love PETA, they so crazy.TheKasp said:Sorry for the two posts so close together.
Well yes, they do something proactive to support their cause. Last year alone they killed 89% of the animals left in their care (1647 out of 1843) [http://www.petakillsanimals.com/]. I am also sure that they financially supported several animal rights terrorist groups.Signa said:Does PETA actually do anything proactive these days, or have they just decided it would be more effective to parody games than to protect the animals they are so attached to? Seriously, go appeal to the furries or something, because gamers aren't having any of this nonsense.
Shouldn't that be "To the Batcave"?.. Yeah I know.Akichi Daikashima said:If I were to hug a zergling, it would;
Devour me
Digest me
Crap me out
Then using my knowledge, would find everyone I know and devour them too
I would sooner hug a cactus, and hence;
FIREBATS, ASSEMBLE!
Nuclear Launch DetectedLysanderNemoinis said:You know, if we shared reality with the StarCraft universe, forget the Zerg, my first objective would be to send a nuke to PETA headquarters. Not for this, mind you, but for ever other thing they do. And I'd be sure to wrap the missile in fur, just to piss them off before they go boom. ^_^
They target the gaming community because they know we will talk about it and make a fuss about it. That in turn may get the attention of larger media outlets leading to greater exposure for PETA. That or they have gone batshit insane. I'm leaning towards the second one of obvious reasons.wooty said:I know this is probably just a joke after the AC4 "whale wail", but since when did PETA feature so prominantly in game discussions and news?
Shouldn't they be throwing paint over celebrities and bankers instead?