Pimp My Gun: Show your Creations [Image Posting tips in the First post]
- Thread starter Atvomat_Nikonov
- Start date
I love the definition your revolvers have, and the shape is nearly perfect. The one thing you might consider fixing is that there should be more space between the area where the hammer and pistol grip meet the drum and trigger guard. All three revolvers have this issue, and while not very important, that is the only significant criticism I have for you.Wadders said:Done some more revolvers, comments and criticisms pleassse
What's up with the grip behind the magazine? Also, some bits are slightly off like the stock, bipod placement and magazine. Fix it up a bit.Rpground said:hawt....O.Ohappysock said:
How about that for a sniper/long range assault rifle, done off of a british SA80
EDIT: Stupid me, just realized that it's a quote of an early post. Nevermind then. Hurrr.
Thanks for the advice! I really like the help in making my designs more accurate!Evil Tim said:One point regarding the WA2000; the free-floating barrel [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-floating_barrel] shouldn't have a bipod attached to it; either put it on the rail underneath or use the weapon's own bipod which mounts to the top of the frame at the front.
Can't really see why you'd put a C-mag on a sniper rifle, and you really need some kind of cheek piece there; resting your cheek against bare metal for extended periods is going to be eight kinds of not fun. Laser's kinda pointless with a scope unless it's an IR rangefinder. Also, that doubled-up flash hider looks like it'd make the barrel rather flimsy.
To give you a reference re: C-mags:
See the ridge near the bottom of the middle section? That rests against the base of the mag well when it's in the gun. Try looking at an AR15-pattern weapon in the newer PMG: pull the reciever off and see how the magazine sits in relation to the action.
IMA FIRIN MUH LAZORS
http://s926.photobucket.com/albums/ad107/IMAFIRINMUHLAZORS/?action=view¤t=LAZORCANNON.jpg
http://s926.photobucket.com/albums/ad107/IMAFIRINMUHLAZORS/?action=view¤t=LAZORCANNON.jpg
Evil Tim said:Also, none of these guns are big enough.
Schwerer Gustav, fired an 800mm shell that was the size of a small tank. the gun itself sat on 2 sets of railway tracks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwerer_Gustav
EDIT: due to the recent fuckup I have caused, I am expressly stating THIS IS NOT MY WORK
It's a bit stale, but I like the effect at the end of the barrel. Try using the new program, it's got lots of interesting new features.IMAFIRINMUHLAZORS said:
Oh, and Welcome To The Escapist.
I believe it's from the comparison of an 800mm shell to a tank in the article. Also, while the shell is the same size as the tank, it's far denser, making it much heavier.Evil Tim said:What kind of small tanks do you have that are half the weight of a Fletcher-Class destroyer?Stickyreiss said:
repost, since my old PB got deleteTimeLord said:This the most epic gun in this thread so far, and after 81 pages, that's deserves a badge in itself!Evil Tim said:Also, none of these guns are big enough.
Cheers for the advice, I'll keep it in mind when I make some moresooperman said:I love the definition your revolvers have, and the shape is nearly perfect. The one thing you might consider fixing is that there should be more space between the area where the hammer and pistol grip meet the drum and trigger guard. All three revolvers have this issue, and while not very important, that is the only significant criticism I have for you.Wadders said:Done some more revolvers, comments and criticisms pleassse
NimbleJack3 said:
L86 LSW has one
