Ah, OK I see where you're going. That's true, but I know I don't use guns for protection. I know recreation can't take precedence over safety, but I like to hunt, trap shoot, and target shoot. I only question the fairness of taking away peoples "pursuit of happiness" (I know this is a little stretch) by taking guns away.Armitage Shanks said:Yes, but if criminals don't use guns they buy, and legal gun owners don't kill people, surely that means removing legal gun owners from the equation would mean that criminals couldn't get guns, and therefore the legal owners would not need them for protection. Right?ellimist337 said:Mmhm, and where did the legal gun owners get their guns from?
I don't understand what this question has to do with anything. They got them from a sporting goods store or a private owner, etc. What's the point? It's still legal.
Also, stealing from legal owners isn't the only place criminals get guns. There is an explosive illegal gun trade of old police and military weapons that would still exist even if you eliminated legal private ownership.