SpaceBat said:
You know, I can't help but find stupid questions like these to be hilarious and somewhat irritating. Why the fuck is everyone so insanely fixated on the fucking ending? Have you not played the rest of the game? I keep hearing people say "Mass Effect 3 was excellent, until that ending. Therefore Mass Effect 3 is a terrible game." and I'm having trouble understanding their line of thought.
It's like people believe that a bad ending always automatically nullifies everything that comes before it for everyone. It doesn't.
I am not done with Bioware (although I haven't played DA2) and if they can dish out the same quality games such as 99% of Mass Effect 3, I see no reason why I should.
The problem is, being the end of not just the game, but the entire Shepard story-arc (and the climax of the whole series building up to this point), the ending needed to be satisfying, if not amazing. It needed to be what the developers promised and sold us on. It needed to be what they advertised it to be. It absolutely failed on every conceivable level and had all the hallmarks of something changed in a hurry at the last minute, poorly thought-out and badly written.
I understand that this was maybe some ironic tribute to Deus-Ex by having an identical set of choices at the end as the old classic forced upon you by a deus ex machina in both the literal and literary sense, but really the customers deserved a lot more effort for their money.
So yes, when the climactic centerpiece of the entire series falls flat this badly, it ruins the entire experience as a whole, and thus not just the game, but the whole trilogy.
So, this makes two horribly disappointing titles back-to-back from Bioware which I've been burned on. There won't be another. They will not likely see another cent from me. I may purchase future titles from them used, but I do not forsee ever buying any more DLC or new games.