Depending on the character I lose to, I may have to use LAAAAAASERS.smearyllama said:PAAAAAAAAYMENTJust_A_Glitch said:Not to people, but when I'm playing Blazblue or something online and I lose a match I know I should have one, I've been known to let loose a few "GAAAAAAY" shouts.
I've also shouted "STAAAAAIGHT" once or twice though, for the lulz.
Pretty much, if it has a strong A, I'll shout it.
AAAAAAAVIARY
LAAAAAASERS
Like that?
HOORAAAAAY! Its catching on!TeeBs said:You don't SAAAAYYYYJust_A_Glitch said:Not to people, but when I'm playing Blazblue or something online and I lose a match I know I should have one, I've been known to let loose a few "GAAAAAAY" shouts.
I've also shouted "STAAAAAIGHT" once or twice though, for the lulz.
Pretty much, if it has a strong A, I'll shout it.
Then you're the only one.This_ends_now said:I fail to see the correlation, good sir.Daystar Clarion said:No. I'm not inbred.
Huh? Did I accidentally sound like a white supremest? If I did, then I'll edit my post.TeeBs said:I'm all for gay rights and I love gay people, but have you ever seen a white supremest *SP* use in there defense, "Its not a message of hate its a message of love"smearyllama said:No. It's offensive on an intellectual level.
Alexander The Great was gay, dammit! You don't see people insulting him!
I believe that there needs to be more love in this world, no matter how it's directed, so why would the spreading of love be an insult?
I find this acceptable because while you are associating the word "gay" in a negative context, it in no way means you feel that gays are something to be viewed in a negative context. Take a look at the Harley driver episode of Southpark. No one calls each other "fags" because they hate gay people. The original meaning of those words has been subverted to general use for everything, and only the bleeding heart liberals think that you are disparaging a particular section of the population when you use those words.DAVEoftheDEAD said:I use the word gay for things i think are bad. "thats gay" "you're gay" "how gay is that?!"
I'm seeing two schools of thought in this thread:
1) Saying something reinforces it as negative, and therefore should not be said at all
2) Saying something repeatedly dulls, mutes or subverts its meaning, therefore it should be said more so that no one will complain about it being non-PC.
I don't know if this insight will reach many people on the 9th page, but consider which group you are in when you start discussing, because it's the belief in one of those two "facts" that is driving the arguments.
Inbred = white trash, white trash = dumb/ignorant as hell.This_ends_now said:Not entirely sure I am.Daystar Clarion said:Then you're the only one.This_ends_now said:I fail to see the correlation, good sir.Daystar Clarion said:No. I'm not inbred.
Oh no sorry, the point I was getting at was everyones definition of love is different.smearyllama said:Huh? Did I accidentally sound like a white supremest? If I did, then I'll edit my post.TeeBs said:I'm all for gay rights and I love gay people, but have you ever seen a white supremest *SP* use in there defense, "Its not a message of hate its a message of love"smearyllama said:No. It's offensive on an intellectual level.
Alexander The Great was gay, dammit! You don't see people insulting him!
I believe that there needs to be more love in this world, no matter how it's directed, so why would the spreading of love be an insult?
I really didn't get your post.