I could not have put it better myself. At least there are some here who stick up for JRPG's and don't have such overwhelming rage over them.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Rant made of win
I could not have put it better myself. At least there are some here who stick up for JRPG's and don't have such overwhelming rage over them.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Rant made of win
Except that gameplay wise... JRPGs are even MORE number based, it's just hidden behind one big number... how many hours you're willing to grind.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Much appreciated. Good choice of avatar by the way-Seraph- said:I could not have put it better myself. At least there are some here who stick up for JRPG's and don't have such overwhelming rage over them.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Rant made of win
I'd like to find where you are, carve the name "Namco: Tales studio" on a large piece of styrofoam, and throw it at you.Bullfrog1983 said:JRPGs can be innovative and fun, but there are maybe 10-20 bad JRPGs for every good one... and most of the good ones have been made by Squaresoft.
Any RPG that encourages you to think is always welcome in my books.
*skip*
Anyway, enough ranting. Do your worst!
I'm glad someone more eloquent than me came along and said something like that.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:snip
And because they're hidden, the numbers therefore don't get in the way.Archaeology Hat said:Except that gameplay wise... JRPGs are even MORE number based, it's just hidden behind one big number... how many hours you're willing to grind.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Much appreciated. Good choice of avatar by the way-Seraph- said:I could not have put it better myself. At least there are some here who stick up for JRPG's and don't have such overwhelming rage over them.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Rant made of win
Nope, we're bias against bad stories, bad story telling, and rail-road gaming. No offence, I just get annoyed when people say Yahtzee's controlling our minds - holds about as much water as the 'games train us to murder' argument.Gladion said:I wouldn't be surprised if many people here were biased because of Yahtzee. Meh, I wouldn't ask that question here But I'd have to stick with japanese RPGs, minus Final Fantasy. Tried a lot of them from the SNES times up until PS2, and only was able to enjoy FF12.
Erm, man or woman?NeutralDrow said:mwmorph said:mwmorph said:I'm a bit confused here. The last good JRPG I played was Chrono Trigger and Earthbound. After that, I've played every Final Fantasy (7 through X-2) at least a little bit and it's always left a sour taste in my mouth.
Basically Final Fantasy role playing means you have to fit into a certain stereotype and really buy into the game or otherwise the story makes no sense to you, theres little to no choice in how your character behaves, you're just along to pick attacks and watch the cinematics.
Western RPGs on the other hand seemed to let you choose who you wanted to. It actually allowed you to choose your dialogue so your character can fit your persona instead of vice versa. Planescape, Fallout, Mass Effect, KOTOR, you could choose to act as you liked.
What I'm trying to say is Final Fantasy is CRAP. Men look like women, women look like 12year old little boys and nobody has an ounce of dignity or charisma left after all the emo-hyperbole-whining going on ("OMG I'm so sad, but the fate of the world is on my shoulder !1!!1!!!"). I always assumed that it is the general state of JRPGs now, since from what I've seen, they all look rather homogenous.
I am definitely open to suggestions though. What I'm trying to say is people seem to say that Final Fantasy is crap and not indicative of JRPGs as a whole. If anyone wants to chime in with suggestions for a JRPG that has a choice filled storyline and where I can choose how my character develops instead of these static 1 dimensional characters, I'd like to really try them out.[http://img410.imageshack.us/my.php?image=finalfantasyviiadventchr.jpg]
^This is what's wrong with JRPGs
^This is what's right with JRPGs.
One of them, at least. <url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giA0h4OXT6g>This helps.
<url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtCiP8B2xpc&feature=related>Does it matter?Doug said:Erm, man or woman?NeutralDrow said:mwmorph said:mwmorph said:I'm a bit confused here. The last good JRPG I played was Chrono Trigger and Earthbound. After that, I've played every Final Fantasy (7 through X-2) at least a little bit and it's always left a sour taste in my mouth.
Basically Final Fantasy role playing means you have to fit into a certain stereotype and really buy into the game or otherwise the story makes no sense to you, theres little to no choice in how your character behaves, you're just along to pick attacks and watch the cinematics.
Western RPGs on the other hand seemed to let you choose who you wanted to. It actually allowed you to choose your dialogue so your character can fit your persona instead of vice versa. Planescape, Fallout, Mass Effect, KOTOR, you could choose to act as you liked.
What I'm trying to say is Final Fantasy is CRAP. Men look like women, women look like 12year old little boys and nobody has an ounce of dignity or charisma left after all the emo-hyperbole-whining going on ("OMG I'm so sad, but the fate of the world is on my shoulder !1!!1!!!"). I always assumed that it is the general state of JRPGs now, since from what I've seen, they all look rather homogenous.
I am definitely open to suggestions though. What I'm trying to say is people seem to say that Final Fantasy is crap and not indicative of JRPGs as a whole. If anyone wants to chime in with suggestions for a JRPG that has a choice filled storyline and where I can choose how my character develops instead of these static 1 dimensional characters, I'd like to really try them out.[http://img410.imageshack.us/my.php?image=finalfantasyviiadventchr.jpg]
^This is what's wrong with JRPGs
^This is what's right with JRPGs.
One of them, at least. <url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giA0h4OXT6g>This helps.
Erm, yeah. Wasn't all that impressed with the video, to be honest.NeutralDrow said:<url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtCiP8B2xpc&feature=related>Does it matter?Doug said:Erm, man or woman?NeutralDrow said:mwmorph said:mwmorph said:I'm a bit confused here. The last good JRPG I played was Chrono Trigger and Earthbound. After that, I've played every Final Fantasy (7 through X-2) at least a little bit and it's always left a sour taste in my mouth.
Basically Final Fantasy role playing means you have to fit into a certain stereotype and really buy into the game or otherwise the story makes no sense to you, theres little to no choice in how your character behaves, you're just along to pick attacks and watch the cinematics.
Western RPGs on the other hand seemed to let you choose who you wanted to. It actually allowed you to choose your dialogue so your character can fit your persona instead of vice versa. Planescape, Fallout, Mass Effect, KOTOR, you could choose to act as you liked.
What I'm trying to say is Final Fantasy is CRAP. Men look like women, women look like 12year old little boys and nobody has an ounce of dignity or charisma left after all the emo-hyperbole-whining going on ("OMG I'm so sad, but the fate of the world is on my shoulder !1!!1!!!"). I always assumed that it is the general state of JRPGs now, since from what I've seen, they all look rather homogenous.
I am definitely open to suggestions though. What I'm trying to say is people seem to say that Final Fantasy is crap and not indicative of JRPGs as a whole. If anyone wants to chime in with suggestions for a JRPG that has a choice filled storyline and where I can choose how my character develops instead of these static 1 dimensional characters, I'd like to really try them out.[http://img410.imageshack.us/my.php?image=finalfantasyviiadventchr.jpg]
^This is what's wrong with JRPGs
^This is what's right with JRPGs.
One of them, at least. <url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giA0h4OXT6g>This helps.
Did it at least irrevocably answer your question?Doug said:Erm, yeah. Wasn't all that impressed with the video, to be honest.NeutralDrow said:<url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtCiP8B2xpc&feature=related>Does it matter?Doug said:Erm, man or woman?
Well, the voice sounded male, but his face looks rather womanly still.NeutralDrow said:Did it at least irrevocably answer your question?Doug said:Erm, yeah. Wasn't all that impressed with the video, to be honest.NeutralDrow said:<url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtCiP8B2xpc&feature=related>Does it matter?Doug said:Erm, man or woman?
Certainly does. Makes him all the more impressive, really. Dare I ask why, again?Doug said:Well, the voice sounded male, but his face looks rather womanly still.NeutralDrow said:Did it at least irrevocably answer your question?Doug said:Erm, yeah. Wasn't all that impressed with the video, to be honest.NeutralDrow said:<url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtCiP8B2xpc&feature=related>Does it matter?Doug said:Erm, man or woman?
How more impressive? Just tells me the JRPG fans just like generic sexually ambigous characters. And meh, technically no, but its certainly something bizzare about JRPGs. Why the obsession with underage lady-boys? And come to look at the drawing again, what's he doing with his hand?!NeutralDrow said:Certainly does. Makes him all the more impressive, really. Dare I ask why, again?Doug said:Well, the voice sounded male, but his face looks rather womanly still.NeutralDrow said:Did it at least irrevocably answer your question?Doug said:Erm, yeah. Wasn't all that impressed with the video, to be honest.NeutralDrow said:<url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtCiP8B2xpc&feature=related>Does it matter?Doug said:Erm, man or woman?
This has always bugged me for some reason. WHY is pokemon the exception to the whole turn based combat!? why is it acceptable for pokemon to be turn based but not other games!? It just doesnt make any sense and is just so hypocritical. Sorry I am not trying to be a jerk or anything, it just baffles me that there are some turn based haters out there, but tolerate pokemon for it.Puppet M. said:also as long as it isn't turn-based outside of Pokemon.
Yep. The androgynous middle-aged snarky badass is just so generic. He's just like that Cloud idiot from those other games! JRPGs, I tells ya...Doug said:How more impressive? Just tells me the JRPG fans just like generic sexually ambigous characters. And meh, technically no, but its certainly something bizzare about JRPGs. Why the obsession with underage lady-boys? And come to look at the drawing again, what's he doing with his hand?!NeutralDrow said:Certainly does. Makes him all the more impressive, really. Dare I ask why, again?Doug said:Well, the voice sounded male, but his face looks rather womanly still.NeutralDrow said:Did it at least irrevocably answer your question?Doug said:Erm, yeah. Wasn't all that impressed with the video, to be honest.NeutralDrow said:<url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtCiP8B2xpc&feature=related>Does it matter?Doug said:Erm, man or woman?
Because its something alot of people were into when they were kids, wee nippers of 10-14. Myself included. It has nostalgia value. Nostalgia can make even the most hateful members of one of the Western RPG or JRPG ships occasionally play something that they would otherwise hate. It is however the perfect example of everything thats wrong with JRPGs from a gameplay, perspective. The story is silly, and hardly the best, but its a kiddy game so we'll ignore it for now.-Seraph- said:This has always bugged me for some reason. WHY is pokemon the exception to the whole turn based combat!? why is it acceptable for pokemon to be turn based but not other games!? It just doesnt make any sense and is just so hypocritical. Sorry I am not trying to be a jerk or anything, it just baffles me that there are some turn based haters out there, but tolerate pokemon for it.Puppet M. said:also as long as it isn't turn-based outside of Pokemon.