Yeah, I think they win at this point. They could make even harder slam dunks too if they wanted.
More like CAN'Tsoles ;DAssassin Xaero said:Between that and the one "Yep, they've got it all." poll option (may be a mistake that is fixed by the time I post this, maybe not), makes me wonder where your biased lies.Matthew Jabour said:Note: If you are a PC gamer, then fuck off, we're talking about consoles.
But no, they haven't "won", nobody has "won". Way I see it, Xbox One is not something I'm going to buy, but that doesn't mean I will buy a PS4. If they both suck, I'll skip both. Nintendo, well, I already have a Wii U, so can't say much there. I do have a PC, too, which I have more games than anything on, so there is always that option. What really "wins" is the games.
I'm not certain that's really going to be the price of the games. I highly doubt they would up the price of the games $40 like that. The current $60 they are charging seems way more likely. Maybe you're right, but that seems like a place holder to me.WOPR said:More like CAN'Tsoles ;DAssassin Xaero said:Between that and the one "Yep, they've got it all." poll option (may be a mistake that is fixed by the time I post this, maybe not), makes me wonder where your biased lies.Matthew Jabour said:Note: If you are a PC gamer, then fuck off, we're talking about consoles.
But no, they haven't "won", nobody has "won". Way I see it, Xbox One is not something I'm going to buy, but that doesn't mean I will buy a PS4. If they both suck, I'll skip both. Nintendo, well, I already have a Wii U, so can't say much there. I do have a PC, too, which I have more games than anything on, so there is always that option. What really "wins" is the games.
But in all seriousness I think one thing alone shows who OBJECTIVELY won the generation. (yes I know what "objectively" means, you'll see what I mean in a second)
http://www.amazon.com/Thief-4-playstation/dp/B00C27SCC2/ref=pd_bxgy_vg_text_z
Let us review...
Brand new game
Xbox One: $100
Playstation 4: $100
Computer: $50
So before anyone starts yelling "well PS4 is $100 less than XB1"
Let's review the facts
1: PS4 and XB1 both require monthly subscriptions for online multiplayer (+$15/month)
2: Both are selling NEW games for $100 ($100/title)
3: At least one of them REQUIRES an HDTV to be played.
All in all the only way you're really "saving money" with your console purchase is presuming you only buy 6 games throughout the ENTIRE generation. Good luck with that. If you plan to play more than 6 games and you're not dead set on certain exclusives, just buy a PC, it's cheaper, it does more, it's cheaper, it's what you're using to reply to me, it's cheaper, it's constantly evolving rather than remaking, oh and did I mention IT'S CHEAPER?!
(alternatively WiiU is a lovely option if you want to get a console because PC's are too complicated)
Um... That is a placeholder, Sony already said their games were going to be $60 a while back...WOPR said:More like CAN'Tsoles ;DAssassin Xaero said:Between that and the one "Yep, they've got it all." poll option (may be a mistake that is fixed by the time I post this, maybe not), makes me wonder where your biased lies.Matthew Jabour said:Note: If you are a PC gamer, then fuck off, we're talking about consoles.
But no, they haven't "won", nobody has "won". Way I see it, Xbox One is not something I'm going to buy, but that doesn't mean I will buy a PS4. If they both suck, I'll skip both. Nintendo, well, I already have a Wii U, so can't say much there. I do have a PC, too, which I have more games than anything on, so there is always that option. What really "wins" is the games.
But in all seriousness I think one thing alone shows who OBJECTIVELY won the generation. (yes I know what "objectively" means, you'll see what I mean in a second)
http://www.amazon.com/Thief-4-playstation/dp/B00C27SCC2/ref=pd_bxgy_vg_text_z
Let us review...
Brand new game
Xbox One: $100
Playstation 4: $100
Computer: $50
So before anyone starts yelling "well PS4 is $100 less than XB1"
Let's review the facts
1: PS4 and XB1 both require monthly subscriptions for online multiplayer (+$15/month)
2: Both are selling NEW games for $100 ($100/title)
3: At least one of them REQUIRES an HDTV to be played.
All in all the only way you're really "saving money" with your console purchase is presuming you only buy 6 games throughout the ENTIRE generation. Good luck with that. If you plan to play more than 6 games and you're not dead set on certain exclusives, just buy a PC, it's cheaper, it does more, it's cheaper, it's what you're using to reply to me, it's cheaper, it's constantly evolving rather than remaking, oh and did I mention IT'S CHEAPER?!
(alternatively WiiU is a lovely option if you want to get a console because PC's are too complicated)
To be fair, there was a notice that $100 was not the official price released by the developer. It's only a place holder. That's not to say it won't be that expensive, only that the company hasn't released the official prices yet.WOPR said:More like CAN'Tsoles ;DAssassin Xaero said:Between that and the one "Yep, they've got it all." poll option (may be a mistake that is fixed by the time I post this, maybe not), makes me wonder where your biased lies.Matthew Jabour said:Note: If you are a PC gamer, then fuck off, we're talking about consoles.
But no, they haven't "won", nobody has "won". Way I see it, Xbox One is not something I'm going to buy, but that doesn't mean I will buy a PS4. If they both suck, I'll skip both. Nintendo, well, I already have a Wii U, so can't say much there. I do have a PC, too, which I have more games than anything on, so there is always that option. What really "wins" is the games.
But in all seriousness I think one thing alone shows who OBJECTIVELY won the generation. (yes I know what "objectively" means, you'll see what I mean in a second)
http://www.amazon.com/Thief-4-playstation/dp/B00C27SCC2/ref=pd_bxgy_vg_text_z
Let us review...
Brand new game
Xbox One: $100
Playstation 4: $100
To be fair, there was a notice that the retail price had not been released yet, and that was basicly a place holder. That's not to say the game won't be that expensive, but the official prices aren't out now.
Computer: $50
So before anyone starts yelling "well PS4 is $100 less than XB1"
Let's review the facts
1: PS4 and XB1 both require monthly subscriptions for online multiplayer (+$15/month)
2: Both are selling NEW games for $100 ($100/title)
3: At least one of them REQUIRES an HDTV to be played.
All in all the only way you're really "saving money" with your console purchase is presuming you only buy 6 games throughout the ENTIRE generation. Good luck with that. If you plan to play more than 6 games and you're not dead set on certain exclusives, just buy a PC, it's cheaper, it does more, it's cheaper, it's what you're using to reply to me, it's cheaper, it's constantly evolving rather than remaking, oh and did I mention IT'S CHEAPER?!
(alternatively WiiU is a lovely option if you want to get a console because PC's are too complicated)
This could be plausible, but considering MS also released Windows 8...rednose1 said:Yep, Sony won.
They won so handily, I am somewhat suspcious. My current tinfoil hat theory is that someone at Microsoft sabotaged the Xbone and handed Sony this console generation in return for cash/future position promises. Seriously, how could highly paid CEO's have signed off on the rancid buzzard vomit that is the Xbone?
Sony has already confirmed $60 games and less than $5 a month PS+ including price cuts and entire games. They require an HDTV? What a disaster, I guess you're still playing your pc on a 800*600 crt display...WOPR said:More like CAN'Tsoles ;DAssassin Xaero said:Between that and the one "Yep, they've got it all." poll option (may be a mistake that is fixed by the time I post this, maybe not), makes me wonder where your biased lies.Matthew Jabour said:Note: If you are a PC gamer, then fuck off, we're talking about consoles.
But no, they haven't "won", nobody has "won". Way I see it, Xbox One is not something I'm going to buy, but that doesn't mean I will buy a PS4. If they both suck, I'll skip both. Nintendo, well, I already have a Wii U, so can't say much there. I do have a PC, too, which I have more games than anything on, so there is always that option. What really "wins" is the games.
But in all seriousness I think one thing alone shows who OBJECTIVELY won the generation. (yes I know what "objectively" means, you'll see what I mean in a second)
http://www.amazon.com/Thief-4-playstation/dp/B00C27SCC2/ref=pd_bxgy_vg_text_z
Let us review...
Brand new game
Xbox One: $100
Playstation 4: $100
Computer: $50
So before anyone starts yelling "well PS4 is $100 less than XB1"
Let's review the facts
1: PS4 and XB1 both require monthly subscriptions for online multiplayer (+$15/month)
2: Both are selling NEW games for $100 ($100/title)
3: At least one of them REQUIRES an HDTV to be played.
All in all the only way you're really "saving money" with your console purchase is presuming you only buy 6 games throughout the ENTIRE generation. Good luck with that. If you plan to play more than 6 games and you're not dead set on certain exclusives, just buy a PC, it's cheaper, it does more, it's cheaper, it's what you're using to reply to me, it's cheaper, it's constantly evolving rather than remaking, oh and did I mention IT'S CHEAPER?!
(alternatively WiiU is a lovely option if you want to get a console because PC's are too complicated)
Uhm. The PS4's PSN+ is $5 per month not $15. Get your numbers right mate please your reminding me a bit of baloneyscholars... I mean politicians.WOPR said:More like CAN'Tsoles ;DAssassin Xaero said:Between that and the one "Yep, they've got it all." poll option (may be a mistake that is fixed by the time I post this, maybe not), makes me wonder where your biased lies.Matthew Jabour said:Note: If you are a PC gamer, then fuck off, we're talking about consoles.
But no, they haven't "won", nobody has "won". Way I see it, Xbox One is not something I'm going to buy, but that doesn't mean I will buy a PS4. If they both suck, I'll skip both. Nintendo, well, I already have a Wii U, so can't say much there. I do have a PC, too, which I have more games than anything on, so there is always that option. What really "wins" is the games.
But in all seriousness I think one thing alone shows who OBJECTIVELY won the generation. (yes I know what "objectively" means, you'll see what I mean in a second)
http://www.amazon.com/Thief-4-playstation/dp/B00C27SCC2/ref=pd_bxgy_vg_text_z
Let us review...
Brand new game
Xbox One: $100
Playstation 4: $100
Computer: $50
So before anyone starts yelling "well PS4 is $100 less than XB1"
Let's review the facts
1: PS4 and XB1 both require monthly subscriptions for online multiplayer (+$15/month)
2: Both are selling NEW games for $100 ($100/title)
3: At least one of them REQUIRES an HDTV to be played.
All in all the only way you're really "saving money" with your console purchase is presuming you only buy 6 games throughout the ENTIRE generation. Good luck with that. If you plan to play more than 6 games and you're not dead set on certain exclusives, just buy a PC, it's cheaper, it does more, it's cheaper, it's what you're using to reply to me, it's cheaper, it's constantly evolving rather than remaking, oh and did I mention IT'S CHEAPER?!
(alternatively WiiU is a lovely option if you want to get a console because PC's are too complicated)
I do apologize, that was rather rude of sir or madam.Charli said:*Walks in casually*Matthew Jabour said:Note: If you are a PC gamer, then fuck off, we're talking about consoles.
*Walks back out*
HEY SONY NEARLY MADE ME CONSIDER BUYING ONE! NEARLY. THAT'S WORTH MY 2 CENTS YA INGRATE!
Really? I didnt know that. I've only played online once on my PS3...so its not exactly a loss for me, but that IS/was one of the selling points of the PS. Huh, I guess I hope that PS4 fails a bit more than before then. I've waited for the death of consoles for a while, but I guess that wont happen at least untill the steambox comes, or the day when cod, halo and final fantasy is long dead and gone.Blue Ranger said:Online gaming is no longer free on PS4, and that bothers me. I hate that. Then I have to listen to idiots trying to tell me I should be grateful to have to pay for PS Plus if I want to play online now. It's pathetic.
For the foreseeable future, I think I will stick to with my new PC and my PS3 (which I mainly use as a bluray player now).
Depends on what they have ready for the holidays. The selling power of Nintendo's IPs is legendary, so we'll see how pricing goes down.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Honestly, I'm surprised. Sony addressed nearly ever fear I had about the console. They put on one hell of a conference, and have left Microsoft looking utterly stupid.
Wii U price-drop inbound. I think even Nintendo will recognise that's necessary at this point. Possibly an Ambassador program similar to 3DS. They're announcing some mega-games today, so I think they'll making some heavy punches of their own (3D Mario, Mario Kart and Smash Bros is every bit as big a deal as FFXV and KH3). At this point, I'd say it's a two-way scrap between Sony and Nintendo. Nintendo have still got some advantages in that they can price themselves cheaper, are now the only console offering free multiplayer, and will have probably the best holiday lineup of any console this year. But they need to get their claws out now, as its going to be a dirty scrap.