Oh right, so it's not the attraction to oversized boobs you have a problem with, but any attraction to anything that is not a real girl. Ok, get it now, was not clear for your previous posts...Phasmal said:I'm not up in arms, nor would I give a rats ass if some guy was comparing me to random drawings (though that wouldnt make any sense), I just personally wouldn't like to date a dude who was all drooley over pixels. I'm not fond of it, but don't worry, I'm not taking it seriously. Just makes me roll my eyes, really.ph0b0s123 said:Women need to stop getting all up in arms about these depictions, as men are not comparing you to them. Men know the difference between real and not real. Also with every character being of a large size the effect is a large size becomes the norm and is comparable to something like a C cup in real life.
Oh, lol.ph0b0s123 said:Oh right, so it's not the attraction to oversized boobs you have a problem with, but any attraction to anything that is not a real girl. Ok, get it now, was not clear for your previous posts...
Not going to touch that attitude as that is a whole other longer discussion.
Of course! If there were no consequenses I would do alot of things.Relish in Chaos said:Here's a question (maybe I'm getting carried away here or unusually horny today): if you were given the opportunity to have sex with your partner or an orgy of people in public, and the onlookers would have no recollection of the event afterwards, would you do it?
Darwin is rolling in his grave, lol.Antitonic said:I know I don't have to prove anything to anyone but myself, but is there a "limit" to what you'd accept? Not antagonizing, just curious.ElPatron said:Am I the only one who was like this in the middle teenage years and gave up?Antitonic said:Sex = do not want. I don't want to hear about it, see it, or anything like that, thank you very much!
No offense, but after being on that side and realizing I was being a hypocrite, I am not leaned into believing you're for real.
I'm 25, and have never had any attraction to anyone or anything, and having sex pushed on me in media or in conversation causes me to feel physically ill. I don't know what more I can say about it.
Those images are mildly terrifying.Paragon Fury said:Well, I'll let you judge for yourself by looking at what I like. 'Cause your scale is confusing.
NSFW - Duh
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I've never understood that. Some government paper and a ceremony invented by men to celebrate their purchase of a woman and to show her off to family defines when you feel ready to express your love, trust and closeness to another? What f marriage had not been invented? What if it were outlawed? What if the cleric lost your papers and never filed them? You would have had sex without being married. Would that be bad? Why use someone else's measure of readiness to define your own? What if you were born in a country were marriage happened at 12 years of age?BOOM headshot65 said:I put strawberry down.
Why?
Because while I would LOVE to say I am totally pure, I would be lying. Every once in a while, my mind drifts to unpure thoughts, me and my girlfriend realize that if we want our own children, we will have to "do it" eventually, and I guess you could say I have a kind-of-sort-of fetish (dont know, but I find women in kimonos to be instantly more attractive)... But other than that it is something we avoid like the plauge. And just in cause you couldnt tell, I am One of those "No sex before marriage" people that is becomeing some uncommon nowadays.
Question: Do I answer based on how I act or how I think?MammothBlade said:Just a silly poll... are you pure as a snowcone, or decadent as a knickerbocker glory sundae?
I'm definitely a knickerbocker.
Humour me.
No, no. I would never tell anyone who or who not to date. I'm the last person to do that. Your comments just came off as very judgemental. I also found it amusing that you would not date anyone into large breasts, when unless you are carrying around a couple of backache creators, the question would probably be academic i.e they would not be bothering you in the first place.Phasmal said:Oh, lol.ph0b0s123 said:Oh right, so it's not the attraction to oversized boobs you have a problem with, but any attraction to anything that is not a real girl. Ok, get it now, was not clear for your previous posts...
Not going to touch that attitude as that is a whole other longer discussion.
No, you misunderstand me. I dont have a problem with either.
What I meant was I, personally would not date a guy who was too into either. I'm not saying that anyone's personal tastes are wrong, but you seem to be insistant that mine are.
Ok, I'mma try and explain this really clearly.ph0b0s123 said:No, no. I would never tell anyone who or who not to date. I'm the last person to do that. Your comments just came off as very judgemental. I also found it amusing that you would not date anyone into large breasts, when unless you are carrying around a couple of backache creators, the question would probably be academic i.e they would not be bothering you in the first place.
Also a correction from a previous post, that is the actual game art, it seems. Weird character design. Bit like skull girls.
Agreed. I personally have no intention of marriage or having children (for personal reasons I won't bother delving into here), because it just seems like an outdated and pointless tradition (originating from religion, and I'm an Atheist) passed off as some kind of "commitment". Isn't just expressing to your partner that you love them a commitment in itself, rather than some empty ceremony and legal document, effectively reducing your relationship to some kind of contract? And I know that many people may not really think about this (because of "tempting fate" or whatever), but if you get divorced, then it's even MORE hassle and you get into all the crap about money and who gets what, and it's especially harmful if there's children involved.Grey Day for Elcia said:I've never understood that. Some government paper and a ceremony invented by men to celebrate their purchase of a woman and to show her off to family defines when you feel ready to express your love, trust and closeness to another? What f marriage had not been invented? What if it were outlawed? What if the cleric lost your papers and never filed them? You would have had sex without being married. Would that be bad? Why use someone else's measure of readiness to define your own? What if you were born in a country were marriage happened at 12 years of age?
It's all so irrelevant.
"Do I love my partner? Do I trust them? Do I wish to show them how much I love them in a way words cannot express? Then I will hold them and embrace them. Oh wait, we have yet to fulfill my society's version of marriage. Guess I shant."
Eh. Very queer.
Same here. I'm more than a little bewildered.dwarf43 said:wh-what did I just watch!?Leemaster777 said:This is one of my favorite animes:
Judge for yourself.
Poledancer angels defeating demons by shooting it with guns made from underwear?...
My brain hurts.
I'll give you the first one on that, maybe the second, but the last two are (acceptably) normal.Grey Day for Elcia said:Those images are mildly terrifying.Paragon Fury said:Well, I'll let you judge for yourself by looking at what I like. 'Cause your scale is confusing.
NSFW - Duh
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()