It's quite gay. Very gay. But that's okay. You don't have to hide from us; we'll still love you. Just come out and admit it, krazykid. We already know and we don't judge you for it.
Poll: It's not gay if...
- Thread starter krazykidd
- Start date
Since being gay is completely acceptable I don't see why one would need to pass it off as anything else. Pretty offensive question if you ask me.
Ummm, probably? I'm like the worst person to ask on any sexual subject because I have an almost phobia level fear of physical intimacy with other people (especially women because they're weird and frightening :S) so i'll just sit here and watch you get sucked off by a guy. I'll pass judgement based on how fast it goes, stopwatch at the ready. :3
[sub][sub]I'm not gay by the way[/sub][/sub]
[sub][sub][sub]No really[/sub][/sub][/sub]
[sub][sub][sub][sub]It's for science![/sub][/sub][/sub][/sub]
Ahh ... Labels. Well if you want to label it.krazykidd said:
You are only homosexual if you are attracted to males and have sexual acts with males only.
You are heterosexual if you are attracted to females and have sexual acts with females only.
You are bisexual (or some variation) if you are attracted to both females and male, and have sex with any gender.
...
Form your post you are attracted to females only, but you are going to have a sexual acts with a male.
So I would say the act would not be classed as a homosexual.
It would ether be classed as flat-out bisexual, or heterosexual bi-curious behaviour (as I assume you would be thinking of females to get you off during the blowjob?).
I suppose if it's dark and you don't know who's blowing you it doesn't really matter. physically it's the same sensation and you wouldn't be gay just from a blowjob but it is a gay sexual act. But being a straight man, if I knew it was a man I'd go limp in a second. Psychological and what not.
Who cares? We as a society need to give up these notions of defining somebody by particular acts, character traits or physical traits. We're all just people, and as long we categorize and define people, they will continue to be artificial barriers that stop us from truly being ourselves among our peers.
Captcha: "Bless you"
Yes, my words are full of wisdom. Bless them.
Captcha: "Bless you"
Yes, my words are full of wisdom. Bless them.
Obviously, yes. Because having sex (or "being pleased") has nothing to do with that at all. Another man could masturbate me or blow me and I'd come to orgasm, even though I'm heterosexual as fuck.
It would be extremely disturbing for me, and I would never seek out such attention, but fysiologically everything is there.
Would such an act suddenly be like: ABRACABRA YOU'RE GAY NOW! No, because being gay isn't something that is determined from one moment to the next, there is birth, there are hormones and potentially other factors that we do not yet know about.
In short, being gay is about doing a different kind of loving. And just pure sex doesn't have much to do with love.
It would be extremely disturbing for me, and I would never seek out such attention, but fysiologically everything is there.
Would such an act suddenly be like: ABRACABRA YOU'RE GAY NOW! No, because being gay isn't something that is determined from one moment to the next, there is birth, there are hormones and potentially other factors that we do not yet know about.
In short, being gay is about doing a different kind of loving. And just pure sex doesn't have much to do with love.
It doesn't depend on your definition of 'gay'. It depends on your definition of 'enjoy'.
If you enjoy it physically, which is to say, you have an orgasm, that doesn't 'make it gay'. If, however, you find the act mentally and emotionally stimulating, then I would be inclined to think your attraction to men isn't as non-existent as you'd think.
If you enjoy it physically, which is to say, you have an orgasm, that doesn't 'make it gay'. If, however, you find the act mentally and emotionally stimulating, then I would be inclined to think your attraction to men isn't as non-existent as you'd think.
I think if your getting a blowjob from someone who you are fully aware is a man and gaining sexual enjoyment from it, then it makes you bisexual at least.
Saying "It's not gay if its only a blowjob" just sounds like some crappy excuse a caught-out Republican senator would use to try and justify it.
Saying "It's not gay if its only a blowjob" just sounds like some crappy excuse a caught-out Republican senator would use to try and justify it.
Seeing that I immediately thought of two things.
...if balls aren't touching.
...if it's on the moon.
Now, to answer the actual thing, from a strictly nonsexual (asexual but that makes no sense in my mind) point of view, I'd say no, deriving sexual pleasure from the same sex is homosexual in nature and is such gay, or at the very least bisexual with a strong preference for women.
But please quote me a bunch telling me how I've got it all wrong, it makes me feel important when I wake up to a million notifications.
*smiley face*
...if balls aren't touching.
...if it's on the moon.
Now, to answer the actual thing, from a strictly nonsexual (asexual but that makes no sense in my mind) point of view, I'd say no, deriving sexual pleasure from the same sex is homosexual in nature and is such gay, or at the very least bisexual with a strong preference for women.
But please quote me a bunch telling me how I've got it all wrong, it makes me feel important when I wake up to a million notifications.
*smiley face*
If you're male and another male can get you aroused, then you have gay tendencies. If not, then you don't.
If you're male, and another male is pleasing you while your thinking of a woman, then it's actually the woman who is arousing you and you're straight.
If both males and females arouse you, then you're bisexual.
If you're male, and another male is pleasing you while your thinking of a woman, then it's actually the woman who is arousing you and you're straight.
If both males and females arouse you, then you're bisexual.