Nvidia is the most stable Radeon is cheaper, so... Nvidia, ill take stability over cheap anyway.
I've been using a Sapphire Radeon HD5850 for years and never thought it would last as long as it has, but it's brilliant. I might think of upgrading to the one you've listed in a few years, if that's a good model. I know hee-haw aboot graphics cards (having only really bought the one) and the significance of their model numbers, so I guess the safest way to get great value in a card is to rely on educated forum recommendations.Daystar Clarion said:Honestly, I have no real preference, mostly because I'm not really tech savvy enough to know the difference. Don't Nvidia cards have a RAM/processor bottleneck?
My current card is a AMD 7870, best card I've ever had.
because its all i know. and it hasn't failed me yet.The Nossa said:Simple question, which type of card do you prefer and why?
Personally I've used both types and have no real preference.
not trying to market or anything, but i literally just saw this deal after i read your post, so figured i'd forward it to you.JudgeGame said:I'm building it from scratch. It's pretty hard to figure out what graphics card suits me just by looking at numbers. I had already settled on the Intel Core i5 3750K Ivy Bridge processor but maybe not. Graphics cards all look ridiculously expensive to me right now and to add insult to injury they all come with Assassin's Creed III which I wouldn't touch with a long stick.loc978 said:Not really, if what you're looking for is the fastest thing available (same goes for NVIDIA)... which is really only useful for future-proofing your system at this point. If you just want to play every game on the market on high graphical settings for the next five years or so, build an AMD system at about half the price.JudgeGame said:Is there a better alternative to an Intel processor? I was just about to buy one.loc978 said:Five years ago I would have said NVIDIA, because ATI drivers were a ***** to deal with. Nowadays, NVIDIA and Intel can suck it. They overcharge damn near as badly as Apple... and OpenGL support is far more important than Windows drivers, what with Windows gaming circling the drain.
**edit**
mind you, if you're just buying a processor to upgrade an existing system, you're stuck within a single generation of intel processors by the slot on your motherboard... same as any other computer (at least the good, modular ones that don't have the processor soldered onto the board).
That's an interesting choice.Lopende Paddo said:because its all i know. and it hasn't failed me yet.The Nossa said:Simple question, which type of card do you prefer and why?
Personally I've used both types and have no real preference.
I'm confused. You act as though all AMD/ATI card manufacturers are the same, (they're not - also why are we referring to AMD/ATI cards as Radeons - that's just a specific family of AMD's cards...). You're going to get different levels of customer service between different companies...some are known to be really good, some are known to be abysmal.Windcaler said:Ive only bought 1 Radeon graphics card before and I had a lot of issues with it plus their customer service rep obviously wasnt experienced enough to help me solve my problem but the nail in the coffin was she was just rude. I kind of swore off Radeon then and havnt tried them again.