Poll: Peta "Porn Site" - Would this even work?

Recommended Videos

ultimateownage

This name was cool in 2008.
Feb 11, 2009
5,346
0
41
It's just gonna be soft core porn and then dead animals pop up occasionally. Just google 'tits' and you can get your fix without the dead animals and idiots.
 

Mullahgrrl

New member
Apr 20, 2008
1,011
0
0
I like that someone who isn't only intrested in money is using this particular medium of expression.

Reminds me of Fuck for forest.
 

Kuroneko97

New member
Aug 1, 2010
830
0
0
So an organization that tells you not to eat meat is making a site in which you will see women eating a man's meat.
 

ZRendZ

New member
Jun 9, 2011
99
0
0
I can see it now "Ah, Yes give me that cucumber, don't me any sausage baby uhhhh..." the woman says screaming while she orgasms, ripping her nails into his back. whether or not this will turn me vegetarian? nope i'll just go eat come oysters. :]
 

ThreeWords

New member
Feb 27, 2009
5,179
0
0
Heartcafe said:
Short story: Nobody goes to a porn site to learn about social/environmental/political issues. They go to fap.
According to Rajt, it will have enough adult content to qualify for the XXX domain site but also some other graphic images of animals that viewers may not expect to see.
I think the point is that the videos will start as porn and end up with shocking revelations about animal cruelty.
 

The Funslinger

Corporate Splooge
Sep 12, 2010
6,145
0
0
666Chaos said:
Well it seems that Peta has finally discovered how to grab peoples attention.
Now if only after-school specials could take a lesson from them.

In all seriousness, this just came out of nowhere. It'll be interesting to see where this goes to say the least.
 

Beautiful End

New member
Feb 15, 2011
1,755
0
0
1. When people watch porn, they don't even notice/care about anything else. Boobs and dicks; you got their attention.

2. How are they gonna raise awareness through pr0ns? Are they...gonna include veggies in...the movies? Cause if that's the case, no thanks. I'll go to some other NORMAL pron site. *Ahem*

3. If it's a site that shows veggie ads before the clips, then no thanks. If they do it towards the end, then I'll just close the browser. Besides, it's not as if after watching some sort of "veggie" porn, I'll suddenly have an urge to turn vegan.

Seriously, I don't see how this could work in any way, form or universe! PETA has become a joke, sadly. I support stopping violence against animals but they've turned into extremists. I can't take them seriously anymore.

EDIT: Whoa, wait. I just thought of a plot twist. They're against treating animals right and stuff but..degrading humans and doing something as humiliating as porn is fine...cause they're just, you know, people and not animals. Oh, okay, PETA. I see what you did there.

On a side note, thank Jeebus for this topic. So many jokes and innuendos in the same place = max lulz. XD
 

The Funslinger

Corporate Splooge
Sep 12, 2010
6,145
0
0
Hawgh said:
I suppose that gigantic side banners with a "Don't eat meat, ya douche!" messages might be, if not more pleasant, then at least less intrusive than a "Your penis can be thiiiiiiiisss beeeeeiig!!!" banner.
I agree, those websites provide way too much work for people whose only marketable skill is using the scaling tool on Photoshop. Although I get the feeling GIFs of kicked puppies alongside porn is going to give us a generation of cry-maxers.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
Heartcafe said:
"...but also some other graphic images of animals that viewers may not expect to see."
Translated: "...it's marketed as a porn site, during which we occasionally shock you with boner-inverting photos of dead animals."

The only reason the "I'd rather go naked..." campaign worked (meaning only that it got people to look directly at it for a moment) was because people knew the faces there. It wasn't because it had naked people, but because it had naked celebrities. This is not that.

They'd be much better off actually starting up a porn site, and using the proceeds to fund PETA activities.
 

genericusername64

New member
Jun 18, 2011
389
0
0
PETA's sexy side displayed in galleries and videos will quickly give way to the sinister world of animal mistreatment uncovered by the group's hidden camera investigations in a very different kind of graphic content.
So they're making a shock site? Stay classy PETA
 

CarlMin

New member
Jun 6, 2010
1,411
0
0
blindthrall said:
I would just like to know where PETA gets the money for all these stunts.
Well you can really cut down costs if you don't spend any money on helping animals as an animal welfare organization.
 

LiquidGrape

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,336
0
0
While I agree with the fundamental ideals of PETA, PETA itself is a reprehensible and sexist organisation, and everyone with an even peripheral degree of responsibility for their promotional campaigns should feel thoroughly ashamed of themselves.
 

AngryBritishAce

New member
Feb 19, 2010
361
0
0
Though I understand that people wish not to eat meat, the attempt to make the world stop eating meat (through any means) is utterly utterly stupid. Animals eat other animals, it's nature. You gonna get a tiger to eat lettuce too?
 
Aug 1, 2010
2,766
0
0
You know, they [i/]could[/i] integrate animals into the site even more if they wanted to...

OT: The only thing about PETA I like is that all the dumbest people in the country are all in one place and they don't really have any power.
 

ckam

Make America Great For Who?
Oct 8, 2008
1,618
0
0
That's rather frightening. I mean a porn site that's going to show you graphic images of animals... Not good for the interests of people trying to find porn in the first place.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,470
0
0
I...what the...I...

Ok! SURE!!! Fine PETA. We'll do your PSA-porno. But not for the reasons you described.

See, I'm pretty sure if someone managed to get off to a chick while pictures of dead whales, baby birds drowning in crude oil, decapitated elephants and mutilated dogs float by, they're going to get put on some government watch list.
AS THEY SHOULD.

I mean...WHAT THE FUCK?
 

DoubleTime

New member
Apr 23, 2010
182
0
0
Oh for the love of - ! What is wrong with these people? Do they have no idea what they're doing to the cause of real animal rights groups? Sheesh....

They know that the "rather go naked than wear fur" ad campaign wasn't well received, just highly public, and then they went on to work with playboy. I was actually just reading a response by a feminist blog (the tempered kind, not the crazies) about how PETA seems to be doing everything it can to "help" animals while perpetuating the image of women as sex objects. It's actually worth a look since it brings up a nice point that why are they naked in a sexually charged way rather than just cold?

http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/ecofeminism/Id-Rather-Go-Naked-Than-Wear-Fur.html

...

"So how pornographic will PETA go? According to Rajt, it will have enough adult content to qualify for the XXX domain site but also some other graphic images of animals that viewers may not expect to see."

Yes, because images of animals being brutalized is exactly what most people want to see while they're wanking...

/sarcasm