Yeah...I wonder why?RatRace123 said:Bioware, by far.
Though, it's very obvious I'm biased.
As an entry into the fallout series, I agree with you on that, it felt more like a Fallout game, the characters story atmostphere, I felt like I was playing Fallout 2 all over again.No_Remainders said:To be fair, Fallout 3 was worse than New Vegas.rockyoumonkeys said:Eh...both are great, but Bethesda loses points for having their name attached to the abomination known as Fallout New Vegas. I know they didn't develop it, but they still published it.
Bioware's games are great, but I think I still enjoyed getting lost in the worlds of Oblivion and Fallout 3 enough to even the scales.
Far, far worse.
I didn't think Fallout 3 was that buggy, and Oblivion was alright too. Never played the old Fallout games though...GeorgW said:It's not even a question for me, Bioware all the way! Bethesda's games are so glitchy nowadays... But old school fallout was great!
I thought Mass Effect was a bad game, and I loved Oblivion and Fallout 3. Bethesda it is!Cuy said:To my knowledge, there are no bad Bioware games. But there are bad Bethesda games. So yeah, Bioware it is.
Just look at all of those games and tell me I'm wrong. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bethesda_Softworks_games]
BUT Bethesda has many more games in general than Bioware. I don't think we're getting anywhere with this.Cuy said:stuff