Culture is the collective knowledge of a population... its customs, its beliefs, its history, passed down from generation to generation. It evolves with time, and is shaped by the people who share it. Britain's (or any nation's) cultural identity today is not what is was fifty years ago, and will have changed significantly in fifty years time. To say that we have no part in the evolution or overall progression of our parent culture is untrue. Having developed within a certain environment, it will determine who you are as an individual, and by sharing your identity with the world around you, you are, by definition, ensuring the survival and development of said culture.Woodsey said:Not in the slightest.I_am_a_Spoon said:That's true.Woodsey said:It is chance. You have no control over you being born here, and your parents have no control over you being the one who is born.Sigmar ov The Hammer said:It's not be pure chance though.Woodsey said:If you'd been born in Mexico, Britain would be exactly the same, only you wouldn't hold deluded pride in a slab of land whose history and culture you've had no part in shaping, and only live in by pure chance.
My father came from here, and his before him, etc etc, and so, like my father, I was born here. My family have been here for centuries.
Therefore, there's no chance I could've been from Mexico, because many generations of my family come from here, Britain!
I also hate the idea that, if you're born in a country you're form there.
How does that work? There's a boy at my school. He's white, his family are from here but yet he insists on saying he's South African, simply because he was born there. What is he, a moron? Just because his ENGLISH mother got impregnated by his ENGLISH father in South Africa and she gave birth to him there doesn't mean you're attached to the culture and history of that nation and it's people.
But are you seriously suggesting that nobody is shaped by their parent nation? That the environment and culture within which we grow up has absolutely no relevance at all to who we are as a person? That we are in no way attached to our home country, and should never attempt to be?
Patriotism is not a bad thing... it's an instinctual sense of belonging, the same drive that held tribes together when humans were no more that cavemen.
I have no doubt that my views on, for example, politics have been formed by the government(s) I have grown up with.
What I'm getting at is that we have not contributed to our culture, or our history, or anything else - why should I be proud of anything Britain did, say, 17 years ago? I'm 16, so anything before then is beyond irrelevant to my personal investment, because I didn't have any, and I continue to not have any on the whole.
Borders shift, governments change, people die, culture moves on, and time passes. How could you possibly feel proud of something that is constantly changing, let alone something you've had only the tiniest hand in, if that?
See, that's exactly what I'm talking about...Woodsey said:I can be proud of people for doing things that I think are right, and I can be glad to live in such a country that is - when all's said and done - pretty great.
Ah, well in case you didn't read it the rest of my post went on to explain that I just don't identify as British. Yes, Scotland is part of the UK but in no way does that make me automatically British. It's right there in the title, 'United Kingdom'. We're just a bunch of countries grouped under one flag, but that doesn't make us (in my eyes at least) British in anything but legal details. (I realise I may come off as a bit snarky here but that isn't my intention.)Nickolai77 said:Mackheath said:I am Scottish. Not British.I've only read the 1st page of this thread so apologies if someone's already told you this: I hate to break it to you but both of you are actually British. Britain consists of England, Wales and Scotland- if you are from any of these countries you are also British.revolutionaification said:I'm not British. I'm Scottish.
Wales is part of Britain and the British Isles, like it or not...CarpathianMuffin said:I'm Welsh, and I have many relatives over in the British Isles, not to mention the person closest to me.
I may not be native British, but I do take some pride in what little I am.
You're certainly not English, but I'm pretty sure Scottish is British.Mackheath said:I am Scottish. Not British.
And no, I am not.
Ah true true, and I do know a lot of Scottish people like that. But just because you close your eyes and cover your ears while screaming 'la la la la' at the top of your voice to something doesn't mean it's not true. (although I totally understand the reasons for doing so)PurpleLemur said:Pfft, I bet you think there're 6 star wars movies or 3 matrix movies, too. See, some Scottish folk, not most, prefer to close their eyes and forget they're connected to the rest of Britain... much like those of us who try and forget the latter two matrixes...Xyliss said:Technically you're both. I am English and would classify myself as such but I'm still British. Regardless of how proud of it you are you still are British.Mackheath said:I am Scottish. Not British.
And no, I am not.
There is a difference with wanting to live somewhere and being proud of it. Any time we cling onto similarities we highlight differences. And Don't even get me started on the royal family....Druss the Slayer said:And to be fair emerald, I think British rule was helpful to a lot of the empire. Look at the state parts of Africa are in, after we (and the French)left.
And *cough* Native Indians *cough*.