Not you, I was asking if Tim Mazzola was satisfied. He seemed to be the one with the question.madwarper said:
Good job, tho. I'm glad somebody else understands whats going on.
Poll: Solve a simple math problem
- Thread starter Flailing Escapist
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Good job, tho. I'm glad somebody else understands whats going on.
14.
I know this question is suppose to trick people into doing a quick look through and answer without really looking carefully. First there's the *0 which makes plenty of people think that it's just zero (anything multiplied by zero is zero) without noticing that you only multiply one 1 by 0. For those that noticed that little trick and figured they were brighter than the average bulb, they left that random -1 in there that people aren't as likely to notice. So people answer 16 without checking the whole thing.
So if you answered incorrectly because you skimmed it, don't feel too bad, it's made to be tricky and fake you out.
I know this question is suppose to trick people into doing a quick look through and answer without really looking carefully. First there's the *0 which makes plenty of people think that it's just zero (anything multiplied by zero is zero) without noticing that you only multiply one 1 by 0. For those that noticed that little trick and figured they were brighter than the average bulb, they left that random -1 in there that people aren't as likely to notice. So people answer 16 without checking the whole thing.
So if you answered incorrectly because you skimmed it, don't feel too bad, it's made to be tricky and fake you out.
The irony of this post, It pleases me.TheLiham said:
actually you need parathesis to do it how you show in the spoiler the way it is posted now means every is multiplied by zero thus the answer is zero basic algebra c'mon people
Parenthesesnovixz said:
Exponents
Multiplication/Division
Addition/Subtraction
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1-1+1+1+1+1+1+(1*0)
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1-1+1+1+1+1+1
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1
14.
(more proof: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1%2B1%2B1%2B1%2B1%2B1%2B1%2B1%2B1%2B1-1%2B1%2B1%2B1%2B1%2B1%2B1*0 )
It saddens me that these people can vote.
One massive facepalm for every time someone says, "It's zero because anything times zero is zero."
On a slightly related side note: Is there a way I can get reimbursed for my tax dollars?
(>-_-)>
On a slightly related side note: Is there a way I can get reimbursed for my tax dollars?
(>-_-)>
Actually, I would argue that this isn't a simple maths problem because it contains no (for lack of a better word) punctuation. In the absence of these, reading left to right, you get zero; but looking at all the discussion about what the answer actually is should show you how badly phrased this equation is.
Also, making this point is about as witty as saying "Alanis Morrisette's song Ironic isn't ironic."
Also, making this point is about as witty as saying "Alanis Morrisette's song Ironic isn't ironic."
No.Harlief said:
It shows how badly 50% of those who have answered the poll are at reading mathematical equations, and/or their misunderstanding of the Order of Operations.
It is a scientific fact that the speed of light is faster than the speed of sound.
Which explains why people appear to be brighter before they open their mouths. And, this thread is simply a megaphone.
Aaaaannnd another takes the bait.henritje said:
You should really take the second or two extra to notice the lack of parenthesis's around all the 1's.
Not exactly sure how this problem is poorly notated. This is exactly the type of problem prospective students or job seekers see on an entrance fundamentals test for programs/jobs that are very heavy in math. It's to see if you know PEMDAS (which is crucial in higher mathematics) and to see if you're paying attention.SuperMse said:
This made my night. Thanks! ^_^madwarper said: