There isn't a mystery. That's what I'm trying to tell everyone. It was in detail explained why Quarians wear full-body suits. So the fact that they are wearing it now is a technicality, not a mystery. I'll tell you what was mysterious; that short moment in the first Lord of the Ring film when we met Aragorn. Before we knew who he was he is only introduced as the Strider, and we briefly see his face partially lit by his own tobacco glow. Soon afterwards he removes his hood to reveal his identity (to the extent he himself identifies with) and the mystery is solved.Radoh said:It isn't that they don't know what to draw her like, it's that they don't know if they want to reveal her and ruin the mystery that the Quarians hold.KaizokuouHasu said:It is lazy. Why do I have to use my imagination to come up with a face for a character I don't even own? One of Bioware's designers just have to put pen to paper and finish the job - which they are already paid for.Tachcoma said:I wouldn't say its lazy just leaves a little more to the imagination it would be nice to see but if they not going to do it well would you rather they not did it at all ?KaizokuouHasu said:Yes. Obviously. Not revealing her face to us is just a lazy move on Bioware's part
Why they wear the suits isn't the mystery you silly, it's what they look like underneath it.KaizokuouHasu said:There isn't a mystery. That's what I'm trying to tell everyone. It was in detail explained why Quarians wear full-body suits. So the fact that they are wearing it now is a technicality, not a mystery.Radoh said:It isn't that they don't know what to draw her like, it's that they don't know if they want to reveal her and ruin the mystery that the Quarians hold.KaizokuouHasu said:It is lazy. Why do I have to use my imagination to come up with a face for a character I don't even own? One of Bioware's designers just have to put pen to paper and finish the job - which they are already paid for.Tachcoma said:I wouldn't say its lazy just leaves a little more to the imagination it would be nice to see but if they not going to do it well would you rather they not did it at all ?KaizokuouHasu said:Yes. Obviously. Not revealing her face to us is just a lazy move on Bioware's part
No, leave the mask on, I thought she needed it for life support anyway.chronicfc said:Lately, with all the talk of Bioware "taking off Tali's mask" in Mass Effect 3, I've been thinking if they should? Maybe the mystery is enough, it is for me, at least. So what do you think? Should they? And what should she look like?
Well I'm generally on the side of taking off the masks. There is definitely a point where them keeping on their masks would simply be counter-intuitive to their situationchronicfc said:Lately, with all the talk of Bioware "taking off Tali's mask" in Mass Effect 3, I've been thinking if they should? Maybe the mystery is enough, it is for me, at least. So what do you think? Should they? And what should she look like?
They never had a reason to reveal the Quarian face when they made Mass Effect. Quarians were in their suits for a reason, and there was no logical reason to remove the suits. All of the character design went into the suit, including the basic "face" that is beneath the mask is meant to highlight the mask through the translucence.KaizokuouHasu said:There isn't a mystery. That's what I'm trying to tell everyone. It was in detail explained why Quarians wear full-body suits. So the fact that they are wearing it now is a technicality, not a mystery. I'll tell you what was mysterious; that short moment in the first Lord of the Ring film when we met Aragorn. Before we knew who he was he is only introduced as the Strider, and we briefly see his face partially lit by his own tobacco glow. Soon afterwards he removes his hood to reveal his identity (to the extent he himself identifies with) and the mystery is solved.Radoh said:It isn't that they don't know what to draw her like, it's that they don't know if they want to reveal her and ruin the mystery that the Quarians hold.KaizokuouHasu said:It is lazy. Why do I have to use my imagination to come up with a face for a character I don't even own? One of Bioware's designers just have to put pen to paper and finish the job - which they are already paid for.Tachcoma said:I wouldn't say its lazy just leaves a little more to the imagination it would be nice to see but if they not going to do it well would you rather they not did it at all ?KaizokuouHasu said:Yes. Obviously. Not revealing her face to us is just a lazy move on Bioware's part
That we don't see a quarians face - ever - and that it isn't even explained is a dick move. From a game that places so much emphasis on explaining how things work in and are in this universe, even down to how Asari reproduce, that they don't even drop us a hint on what the general facial make-up is. Do they have two eyes? Four? Do they have Eye-lids?
True, but a few important points...ChupathingyX said:No he isn't, he has a personality, a voice, backstory and in one of the novels it mentions him having pale, white skin.Canadish said:There is a difference. Master Chief is a blank slate "insertyourselfhere" protagonist.
I think those look a bit too human for my taste. I'm hoping for a pretty alien but not to much like they made the Asari look like blue humans with weird scalp implants.-Dragmire- said:If they do show her face, there are some good concept art floating around that I kinda like and so wouldn't mind if she looked like these. I won't complain if they don't show it though, I'm used to it by now.
![]()
![]()
There's also some pretty scary shit too...
And that is also what I'm getting at. That shouldn't be a mystery! There are billions of Quarians in the ME universe, and many of them have shown their faces, and bodies to non-Quarians, Shepard included if you're into that sort of thing. The only people who aren't let in on what Quarians look is the player. And I paid for this?Radoh said:Why they wear the suits isn't the mystery you silly, it's what they look like underneath it.KaizokuouHasu said:There isn't a mystery. That's what I'm trying to tell everyone. It was in detail explained why Quarians wear full-body suits. So the fact that they are wearing it now is a technicality, not a mystery.Radoh said:It isn't that they don't know what to draw her like, it's that they don't know if they want to reveal her and ruin the mystery that the Quarians hold.KaizokuouHasu said:It is lazy. Why do I have to use my imagination to come up with a face for a character I don't even own? One of Bioware's designers just have to put pen to paper and finish the job - which they are already paid for.Tachcoma said:I wouldn't say its lazy just leaves a little more to the imagination it would be nice to see but if they not going to do it well would you rather they not did it at all ?KaizokuouHasu said:Yes. Obviously. Not revealing her face to us is just a lazy move on Bioware's part
Well there's a significant difference. Master chief is a very impersonal character; he has no relations outside Cortana, an AI construct.Arehexes said:Should Microsoft show what Master Chief looks like? If anyone says no then you can't really explain why Tali's face should be shown.
Yeah, you paid for Mass Effect 2 with the express and sole interest in seeing Tali's face. That's all you paid for, and were obviously disappointed that there was a game there instead.KaizokuouHasu said:And that is also what I'm getting at. That shouldn't be a mystery! There are billions of Quarians in the ME universe, and many of them have shown their faces, and bodies to non-Quarians, Shepard included if you're into that sort of thing. The only people who aren't let in on what Quarians look is the player. And I paid for this?Radoh said:Why they wear the suits isn't the mystery you silly, it's what they look like underneath it.KaizokuouHasu said:There isn't a mystery. That's what I'm trying to tell everyone. It was in detail explained why Quarians wear full-body suits. So the fact that they are wearing it now is a technicality, not a mystery.Radoh said:It isn't that they don't know what to draw her like, it's that they don't know if they want to reveal her and ruin the mystery that the Quarians hold.KaizokuouHasu said:It is lazy. Why do I have to use my imagination to come up with a face for a character I don't even own? One of Bioware's designers just have to put pen to paper and finish the job - which they are already paid for.Tachcoma said:I wouldn't say its lazy just leaves a little more to the imagination it would be nice to see but if they not going to do it well would you rather they not did it at all ?KaizokuouHasu said:Yes. Obviously. Not revealing her face to us is just a lazy move on Bioware's part
It's stupid. I can't see why you'd defend something like this. It's just unreasonable. It's is comparable to systematically tearing out the last 3 chapters out of every book you buy so that the ending will remain a mystery. ¬_¬
This answer. I'd even say there should be a few things you have to do if you are going to romance her to get her to show her face just in case people do want to romance her but dont want the mystery ruined.spartan231490 said:Yes, but it should be a part of her romance plot, so that the people who don't want to see her don't have to.
1st Paragraph) That was only because Tali was not a romantic interest in the first game, not was any other Quarian.Skyblade12 said:KaizokuouHasu said:There isn't a mystery. That's what I'm trying to tell everyone. It was in detail explained why Quarians wear full-body suits. So the fact that they are wearing it now is a technicality, not a mystery. I'll tell you what was mysterious; that short moment in the first Lord of the Ring film when we met Aragorn. Before we knew who he was he is only introduced as the Strider, and we briefly see his face partially lit by his own tobacco glow. Soon afterwards he removes his hood to reveal his identity (to the extent he himself identifies with) and the mystery is solved.Radoh said:It isn't that they don't know what to draw her like, it's that they don't know if they want to reveal her and ruin the mystery that the Quarians hold.KaizokuouHasu said:It is lazy. Why do I have to use my imagination to come up with a face for a character I don't even own? One of Bioware's designers just have to put pen to paper and finish the job - which they are already paid for.Tachcoma said:I wouldn't say its lazy just leaves a little more to the imagination it would be nice to see but if they not going to do it well would you rather they not did it at all ?KaizokuouHasu said:Yes. Obviously. Not revealing her face to us is just a lazy move on Bioware's part
That we don't see a quarians face - ever - and that it isn't even explained is a dick move. From a game that places so much emphasis on explaining how things work in and are in this universe, even down to how Asari reproduce, that they don't even drop us a hint on what the general facial make-up is. Do they have two eyes? Four? Do they have Eye-lids?
They never had a reason to reveal the Quarian face when they made Mass Effect. Quarians were in their suits for a reason, and there was no logical reason to remove the suits. All of the character design went into the suit, including the basic "face" that is beneath the mask is meant to highlight the mask through the translucence.
When Mass Effect 2 was being developed, BioWare quickly realized that the character and race were insanely popular, and that, while there were tons of people who wanted the reveal, there was no way they could do a reveal and meet any of the fan's expectations.
That's why there is no concept art of it, because it was never an issue. There was no reason to develop one in ME, Quarians were just a race, and the suit was what the player saw, and therefore where the development was. And in ME2, it was already too late to do a reveal that would please the Tali fans.
It's not laziness. Why don't you sit down and try to make a Quarian under the mask that will please the Tali fanbase?
Oh, you joker. Actually I paid for a game that would be a better game than the first one, but instead got a shitty over-shoulder shooter pretending to be an RPG with crap mini games and less than half of the content that I was presented with on the first game. ON TWO CDs!Radoh said:KaizokuouHasu said:And that is also what I'm getting at. That shouldn't be a mystery! There are billions of Quarians in the ME universe, and many of them have shown their faces, and bodies to non-Quarians, Shepard included if you're into that sort of thing. The only people who aren't let in on what Quarians look is the player. And I paid for this?Radoh said:Why they wear the suits isn't the mystery you silly, it's what they look like underneath it.KaizokuouHasu said:There isn't a mystery. That's what I'm trying to tell everyone. It was in detail explained why Quarians wear full-body suits. So the fact that they are wearing it now is a technicality, not a mystery.Radoh said:It isn't that they don't know what to draw her like, it's that they don't know if they want to reveal her and ruin the mystery that the Quarians hold.KaizokuouHasu said:It is lazy. Why do I have to use my imagination to come up with a face for a character I don't even own? One of Bioware's designers just have to put pen to paper and finish the job - which they are already paid for.Tachcoma said:I wouldn't say its lazy just leaves a little more to the imagination it would be nice to see but if they not going to do it well would you rather they not did it at all ?KaizokuouHasu said:Yes. Obviously. Not revealing her face to us is just a lazy move on Bioware's part
It's stupid. I can't see why you'd defend something like this. It's just unreasonable. It's is comparable to systematically tearing out the last 3 chapters out of every book you buy so that the ending will remain a mystery. ¬_¬
Yeah, you paid for Mass Effect 2 with the express and sole interest in seeing Tali's face. That's all you paid for, and were obviously disappointed that there was a game there instead.