Actually that already happened. It was called The Pipp!n, and it was indeed all sorts of fail.codisthebest said:actually the next fail in gamin is going to be when apple decides to make a game console
Actually that already happened. It was called The Pipp!n, and it was indeed all sorts of fail.codisthebest said:actually the next fail in gamin is going to be when apple decides to make a game console
*shudder*codisthebest said:actually the next fail in gamin is going to be when apple decides to make a game console
So uhhhh... Sony has actually had a fairly good history with consoles?Madara said:Sony ever stopped failing?
Hmm I think the screen in the controller thing is gonna bomb hard. Though Nintendo being Nintendo they will make us look like jackasses and manage to pull it off. So whoever manages to churn out a copy of it fastest out of Sony or MS.
i feel like the casual market will depend highly on the price. for people who are purely casual gamers i feel like it will be tougher to convince them to buy a new console if they already enjoy their wii. as for the hardcore gamers, im not so sure. i mean, i dont think anyone would consider games like zelda or mario to be hardcore. i dont know all the games nintendo has announced but what exclusive titles does the wii u have that would be considered hardcore?Raykuza said:Nintendo is the wrong answer. They have both the casual and hardcore markets on lock. The casual folks like silly gimmicks, and when that market dries up, they always have Zelda and friends in their back pocket. They can't lose at this point. Making games has been their only job since 1974. They do it pretty damn well.
My initial response was to your first post:randomfox said:Well that'd be really fucking relevant if what I was talking about was what games you like and don't like and not, for example, about what I was actually fucking talking about.
That first post had nothing to do with sales and what kept Sony afloat was their 1st party games as Microsoft got out of the gate first and had several early 3rd party exclusives, and the PS3 got several games like Bioshock and Eternal Sonata a year or so later. Gamers knew the franchises that would soon be coming to the PS3 during the "PS3 has no games" year. And, publishers know that there is really no reason to go platform exclusive, it just makes financial sense to go multiplatform unless Sony or MS send a truck full of money to you. Sony is pumping out the quality games faster than both Nintendo and Microsoft. Microsoft had pretty much nothing to show at E3 except, hey, we doing another Halo trilogy.Sony failed with their current console. As much as I hope their next one will be better, I don't wish for bad games no one does, but the only thing that even kept the PS3 afloat was the massive third party library of games, and the PS3 and PS4 simple doesn't/wont have that with current gen graphics and the like. I love their indie selection on PSN, but if I had to guess I would say I think the PS4 is going to fail.
What are you talking about, their only "fails" are the Virtual Boy and the Gamecube, everything else was crazy successful.Clive Howlitzer said:Nintendo has a pretty good track record of failing. At least I had a good run with NES thru N64.
Third party support isn't necessary when first party titles are incredibly good. And I don't think having consoles and games that are the best selling in the world, is doing it wrong.Xzi said:When 99.9% of all your third-party titles sell 2 million copies or less, you're doing it wrong. And/or have no real third-party support.
Out of the big three I say the PS3 has the most quality exclusives, third party or notrandomfox said:Periods, mother fucker, do you use them!?Patrick Young said:waait how did sony fail with the ps3 the ps3 is a great machinerandomfox said:Sony failed with their current console. As much as I hope their next one will be better, I don't wish for bad games no one does, but the only thing that even kept the PS3 afloat was the massive third party library of games, and the PS3 and PS4 simple doesn't/wont have that with current gen graphics and the like. I love their indie selection on PSN, but if I had to guess I would say I think the PS4 is going to fail.
haters gonna hate
OT:
Microsoft needs to stop focusing on the kinect if they stop they will not fail but if they don't they will fail
Great machine or not (by the way I love the object and factually supported argument there) the numbers don't lie. The PS3 is at the bottom of the poles because it lacked what carried the PS2: third party support. With current gen consoles the PS3 doesn't have the massive library the PS2 had because not all third party developers can afford current gen graphics, which is why most of them moved over to the Wii. The downsides of upping the graphics bar.
Since the PS4 is probably only going to get more convoluted, they are going to lose even more third party support, and I predict that is what's going to make them fail again. That and they made the Vita AT&T exclusive, which killed that system before he even got to the price point.
AT&T is an American company, the Vita will be released worldwide.randomfox said:AT&T fiasco?
I would assume it's running on AT&T exclusively in America, I can't see Sony selling a license for worldwide 3G rights to their console to one company who only operate in America.randomfox said:And yet the Vita is running on AT&T exclusively. Did you think I didn't realize the American company thing? Cuz I did say I thought the Vita would fail, because it's running on AT&T exclusively, and the Vita will be released world wide...
Is anyone else getting this yet, or is it still just me?