This could actually be kind of fun if you were careful about it. I love the idea someone had about British people powering up after having a cup of tea, for instance, as a British person it makes me feel good having a part of my culture acknowledged in a playful way. But perhaps that's the key, referring to culture instead of race.
That's why Civilisation gets away with it, they refer to things that the nationality has a factual history in being good at, so if you had people that were representative of a country and culture as opposed to saying 'this person's good/bad at something because they have these genes', you'd have a much better chance of not only getting away with it, but making people quite pleased with your nod to the traditions of their culture.
TheEndlessSleep said:
Jandau said:
And yes, reinforcing any stereotype, even a positive one, is racism. Just as any form of discrimination, even positive discriminatin is racist.
But positive steryotyping isn't really offensive is it?
If I was Black, I'd certainly think it was a good thing if people automatically assumed I could run fast and had a large penis...
Being offended when somebody thinks you're better than them in some way seems a little irratonal doesn't it?
It might not be offensive straight off the bat, but it could be annoying or affect you adversely. What if women were interested you because they heard black guys have large penises, and you get to bed and they take the piss out of you and leave because you weren't what she expected. Not so good for your ego. Or you're not a very good runner and people say you're a rubbish excuse for a black guy.
But also, a problem is that by saying one race is better at something, people start to assume that they should choose them for certain jobs over other races. An Asian who gets hired for an accountancy job based on their race might be pleased, but the Latino guy who was actually a better mathematician won't be too happy.