Poll: What weapons will you use in a zombie apocalypse?

Recommended Videos

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
Lev The Red said:
spartan231490 said:
Lev The Red said:
my Mosin and it's bayonet. i have about 400 rounds, plus about 400 empty cases and the materials needed to reload about 800 cases. that, combined with just how common 7.62x54r is, makes me think i'll be ok.
Dude, where do you live? I'm a gun nut and I'd never even heard of this round, you don't see it much in rural America.
i'm from Virginia.

it's a rifle round from the Russian Empire. it was made for the Mosin-Nagant, but it's also used in Soviet and Russian sniper rifles and some machine guns. it's EXTREMELY common because the Soviets made millions of Mosins before, during, and after WW2. you can buy them in "spam cans" of about 450 for about $80.
I googled it, still surprised that they're common in the USA, what with all the cold war BS not so very far behind it many people are still squiemish about buying russian anything, and as far as I can tell only one non-russian gun was made fore it, the winchester model 1895.
Honestly, I'd take a 30-06 over that any day, I bet the ammo is more common in more places, and it has significantly more power and range(not that you need that in the zombie apocalypse, I'm just talking about in general here).

Still, I'm happy I heard about it. I wonder if my gun collecting friend has one? If not he'll be excited to find a relatively common ammo type he doesn't have.
 

Whateveralot

New member
Oct 25, 2010
953
0
0
My charisma.

Alright, maybe this won't prove such a big success. But I'm rather much a fan of digging in somewhere for the nights and moving during the daylight. Or the other way around, depends on them being nocturnal or not.

I'm pretty sure that in case of emergency, I'll use a machete, big knife or any other mostly stealthy weapon.
 

JoesshittyOs

New member
Aug 10, 2011
1,961
0
0
I would force them to read through every 'zombie apocalypse weapon' thread we've ever had on these forums.

Some might say that would be to cruel.
 

Lev The Red

New member
Aug 5, 2011
454
0
0
spartan231490 said:
Lev The Red said:
spartan231490 said:
Lev The Red said:
my Mosin and it's bayonet. i have about 400 rounds, plus about 400 empty cases and the materials needed to reload about 800 cases. that, combined with just how common 7.62x54r is, makes me think i'll be ok.
snip
snip.
I googled it, still surprised that they're common in the USA, what with all the cold war BS not so very far behind it many people are still squiemish about buying russian anything, and as far as I can tell only one non-russian gun was made fore it, the winchester model 1895.
Honestly, I'd take a 30-06 over that any day, I bet the ammo is more common in more places, and it has significantly more power and range(not that you need that in the zombie apocalypse, I'm just talking about in general here).

Still, I'm happy I heard about it. I wonder if my gun collecting friend has one? If not he'll be excited to find a relatively common ammo type he doesn't have.
the gun community doesn't care about the cold war. a good rifle or bullet is good regardless of where it came from.

.30-06 rounds are WAAAAY more expensive than 54r; generally around ¢50-$1 a round. 54r goes for about ¢15-¢20 a round if you buy milsurp, which is extremely common and can be bought on the internet in bulk. also, their energy on impact is about the same (or high enough on both to not really make a difference). the biggest difference is .30-06 has a higher velocity, which makes it louder, which would not be very helpful.

mosins, the rifle the round was made for, are also extremely common and extremely cheap, generally around $75-$130 depending on which model you buy. older ones (91/30s) are the most common, the least expensive, and often considered the best because of when they were made. i'd take a mosin over a .30-06 any day. they're cheaper, easier to maintain, and ammo is cheaper and more abundant.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
Lev The Red said:
spartan231490 said:
Lev The Red said:
spartan231490 said:
Lev The Red said:
my Mosin and it's bayonet. i have about 400 rounds, plus about 400 empty cases and the materials needed to reload about 800 cases. that, combined with just how common 7.62x54r is, makes me think i'll be ok.
snip
snip.
I googled it, still surprised that they're common in the USA, what with all the cold war BS not so very far behind it many people are still squiemish about buying russian anything, and as far as I can tell only one non-russian gun was made fore it, the winchester model 1895.
Honestly, I'd take a 30-06 over that any day, I bet the ammo is more common in more places, and it has significantly more power and range(not that you need that in the zombie apocalypse, I'm just talking about in general here).

Still, I'm happy I heard about it. I wonder if my gun collecting friend has one? If not he'll be excited to find a relatively common ammo type he doesn't have.
the gun community doesn't care about the cold war. a good rifle or bullet is good regardless of where it came from.

.30-06 rounds are WAAAAY more expensive than 54r; generally around ¢50-$1 a round. 54r goes for about ¢15-¢20 a round if you buy milsurp, which is extremely common and can be bought on the internet in bulk. also, their energy on impact is about the same (or high enough on both to not really make a difference). the biggest difference is .30-06 has a higher velocity, which makes it louder, which would not be very helpful.

mosins, the rifle the round was made for, are also extremely common and extremely cheap, generally around $75-$130 depending on which model you buy. older ones (91/30s) are the most common, the least expensive, and often considered the best because of when they were made. i'd take a mosin over a .30-06 any day. they're cheaper, easier to maintain, and ammo is cheaper and more abundant.
I'll give you that it's cheaper, but the 30-06 has noticeably more energy on impact. It doesn't much matter on the East coast, but the 7.62X54r is virtually identical to a .308, and I know a great many hunters out west who won't even touch a .308 because it just doesn't have enough power. the 30-06 is a 7.62X63 round, which means it has roughly 20% more powder and energy.

As for rifle cost, I don't know about you, but I don't buy my rifles, which I expect to outlive the children I will one day have, based on how cheap they are. And a 30-06 is no more difficult to maintain, and the ammo is more abundant in more places.
 

The Heik

King of the Nael
Oct 12, 2008
1,568
0
0
spartan231490 said:
Bullets are easier and faster to make than arrows
No they're not. As I've said before, you need to know how to forge and do chemistry just to make a basic bullet (a la the civil war), and so much can go wrong with that if you're not aware of it. If you mix the components of the gunpowder wrong it could either make the bullet barely slide out the barrel or blow up the gun in your face. If the bullet or casing have a dent or errant edge the gun can jam or (again) blow up the gun in your face. Unless you have a lot of very specific and technical knowledge in regards to making a bullet (and hopefully a weapons factory that can make ammunition to the exacting standards of today's more refined weapons) it is completely inadvisable to do so.


As to the paint-ball masks, you must use a very different mask from me, I've never gotten so much as a fleck inside my mask. yes they are designed so you can breath but those gaps are small and if the incoming liquid is larger than the gap it will usually stick to the mask instead of landing on your face. Also remember, the paint from a paint-ball is moving with much more force than any blood from a zombie would, I doubt blood would get even into your mask. Also, any protection is better than no protection, I'm still advocating long range firearms as a primary weapon of choice.[/quote]

Actually there is a psychological thing that occurs when a person has partial protection in that they think that they're fine. When you know that you have no defence against something you do anything possible to avoid such a situation, but when you have something that *might* work against it, the human brain sometimes assumes that it'll be alright against the threat, thereby increasing the actual likelihood of them getting into such situations and getting hurt anyways.

Also you need to remember that blood is not paintball paint. Paintball paint is designed to be heavy and viscous so that when it connects with something the full force of the ball hits and it leaves a nice consistent splat for easy identification in a game. Blood however needs to be fluid enough to move through a constantly shifting human body. That means when it comes out of the body, it tends to mist, so the splatter is far more fine and spread out. And given half a chance it will get through any hole in whatever face protection you have. The only way to ensure it doesn't get into your system is to ensure there's no direct way in ,so something that's waterproof is the way to go (and considering how many people can usually find something like that, it's the far more likely option)
 

flaviok79

New member
Feb 22, 2011
188
0
0
Other. Explanation: since zombie lore established that you must destroy the head, or at least, most of their bodies to incapacitate them, and aiming in a frantic run for one?s life is not an aiming friendly situation, I would like scatter damage weapons, like shotguns and flamethrowers. That would certainly open a route for escape, if not completely wiping out the zombies.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
The Heik said:
spartan231490 said:
Bullets are easier and faster to make than arrows
No they're not. As I've said before, you need to know how to forge and do chemistry just to make a basic bullet (a la the civil war), and so much can go wrong with that if you're not aware of it. If you mix the components of the gunpowder wrong it could either make the bullet barely slide out the barrel or blow up the gun in your face. If the bullet or casing have a dent or errant edge the gun can jam or (again) blow up the gun in your face. Unless you have a lot of very specific and technical knowledge in regards to making a bullet (and hopefully a weapons factory that can make ammunition to the exacting standards of today's more refined weapons) it is completely inadvisable to do so.


spartan231490 said:
As to the paint-ball masks, you must use a very different mask from me, I've never gotten so much as a fleck inside my mask. yes they are designed so you can breath but those gaps are small and if the incoming liquid is larger than the gap it will usually stick to the mask instead of landing on your face. Also remember, the paint from a paint-ball is moving with much more force than any blood from a zombie would, I doubt blood would get even into your mask. Also, any protection is better than no protection, I'm still advocating long range firearms as a primary weapon of choice.
Actually there is a psychological thing that occurs when a person has partial protection in that they think that they're fine. When you know that you have no defence against something you do anything possible to avoid such a situation, but when you have something that *might* work against it, the human brain sometimes assumes that it'll be alright against the threat, thereby increasing the actual likelihood of them getting into such situations and getting hurt anyways.

Also you need to remember that blood is not paintball paint. Paintball paint is designed to be heavy and viscous so that when it connects with something the full force of the ball hits and it leaves a nice consistent splat for easy identification in a game. Blood however needs to be fluid enough to move through a constantly shifting human body. That means when it comes out of the body, it tends to mist, so the splatter is far more fine and spread out. And given half a chance it will get through any hole in whatever face protection you have. The only way to ensure it doesn't get into your system is to ensure there's no direct way in ,so something that's waterproof is the way to go (and considering how many people can usually find something like that, it's the far more likely option)

Firstly, if you try to fire a modern rifle using black powder, it won't work, and you can't mis-mix black powder in a way that would make it blow the gun up in your face, if you had a muzzel loader to use black powder.


You don't need a forge, where are you getting that? You can melt lead over a camp fire, and brass is reusable several times. You can also scavenge bullets from any caliber to get gunpowder and a similar caliber will provide you with primers. I have already admitted that once you run out of materials such as those arrows are easier, that wasn't the point I was trying to make.

Once more, I am advocating a primary weapon of a firearm to maintain safe distance. If you need to close into melee, any protection is better than no protection. Also, blood is very viscous, several times more so in a body that is no longer living(like a zombie), as blood coagulates it becomes much much more viscous, almost like paste, a paint ball mask would provide decent protection in a form that is designed to stay on your head, instead of something that was cobbled together that might come untied or slide off your face once you start swinging a weapon around and getting all sweaty.
 

The Heik

King of the Nael
Oct 12, 2008
1,568
0
0
spartan231490 said:
The Heik said:
spartan231490 said:
Bullets are easier and faster to make than arrows
No they're not. As I've said before, you need to know how to forge and do chemistry just to make a basic bullet (a la the civil war), and so much can go wrong with that if you're not aware of it. If you mix the components of the gunpowder wrong it could either make the bullet barely slide out the barrel or blow up the gun in your face. If the bullet or casing have a dent or errant edge the gun can jam or (again) blow up the gun in your face. Unless you have a lot of very specific and technical knowledge in regards to making a bullet (and hopefully a weapons factory that can make ammunition to the exacting standards of today's more refined weapons) it is completely inadvisable to do so.


spartan231490 said:
As to the paint-ball masks, you must use a very different mask from me, I've never gotten so much as a fleck inside my mask. yes they are designed so you can breath but those gaps are small and if the incoming liquid is larger than the gap it will usually stick to the mask instead of landing on your face. Also remember, the paint from a paint-ball is moving with much more force than any blood from a zombie would, I doubt blood would get even into your mask. Also, any protection is better than no protection, I'm still advocating long range firearms as a primary weapon of choice.
Actually there is a psychological thing that occurs when a person has partial protection in that they think that they're fine. When you know that you have no defence against something you do anything possible to avoid such a situation, but when you have something that *might* work against it, the human brain sometimes assumes that it'll be alright against the threat, thereby increasing the actual likelihood of them getting into such situations and getting hurt anyways.

Also you need to remember that blood is not paintball paint. Paintball paint is designed to be heavy and viscous so that when it connects with something the full force of the ball hits and it leaves a nice consistent splat for easy identification in a game. Blood however needs to be fluid enough to move through a constantly shifting human body. That means when it comes out of the body, it tends to mist, so the splatter is far more fine and spread out. And given half a chance it will get through any hole in whatever face protection you have. The only way to ensure it doesn't get into your system is to ensure there's no direct way in ,so something that's waterproof is the way to go (and considering how many people can usually find something like that, it's the far more likely option)

Firstly, if you try to fire a modern rifle using black powder, it won't work, and you can't mis-mix black powder in a way that would make it blow the gun up in your face, if you had a muzzel loader to use black powder.
I meant civil war in terms of general quality of firearms. At that point weapons and ammunition were still being made by your average human being (automated manufacturing had yet to be invented), so the designs were pretty rudimentary in terms of exact specifications in order to compensate for human error. Modern firearms though are made to exacting standards (it's why their quality is much better, exact weapon design notwithstanding). Trying to use basic metalwork to make a bullet would result in very poor ammunition indeed as what you make would not match what a modern weapon is expected to have

Also making gunpowder from scratch (which I was implying in my previous post) is not an easy thing to do. You have to know what the proper mix of sulfur, charcoal and potassium nitrate is for the weapons you're using, else it'll either be not enough actual force and too much flash (a firework) or too much force and not enough control (resulting in damage to the weapon or even the user)

spartan231490 said:
You don't need a forge, where are you getting that?
When did I say that you needed a forge to make bullets? I said that you need to forge, a general term used in reference to metalworking. I know that may seem like a small distinction, but one word can mean a world of difference in language.


spartan231490 said:
You can melt lead over a camp fire, and brass is reusable several times. You can also scavenge bullets from any caliber to get gunpowder and a similar caliber will provide you with primers. I have already admitted that once you run out of materials such as those arrows are easier, that wasn't the point I was trying to make.
But the issue I am discussing here is not that you'll run out of materials (though that is certainly true). It is that anyone who isn't a trained and experienced weapons and ammo manufacturer isn't going to effectively make a working round of ammunition.

Sure you can melt lead bullets at a campfire, but where are you going to cast them? Sticking a spare bullet into the sand isn't going to cut it, as I mentioned before the quality of the slug would not match the quality of the casing it's supposedly going into. And sure you can use gunpowder from other guns, but how can you be sure it's the right grade or amount? Ballparking it isn't going to solve your problem, as too much can cause the aforementioned face blowing off, and too little can throw the trajectory off or even prevent the slug from leaving the gun. There's simply too many variables to make a bullet capable of being properly fired by your average modern firearm.

Also good luck with finding brass casings in your average wilderness environment. To put that into perspective, the last time I saw my little cousins we had a nerf fight with guns that had darts with bright orange cartridges (Winchester style) the size of my entire thumb, and we still managed to lose half of them without leaving the house. Brass casings not even the size of couple of finger digits in a place overgrown with plants (especially when you aren't completely sure where they've landed) is going to be a herculean task to say the least, especially when compared with the fluorescently fletched 30inch long modern arrow which one tends to follow on trajectory to make sure it hit its target.


spartan231490 said:
Also, blood is very viscous, several times more so in a body that is no longer living(like a zombie), as blood coagulates it becomes much much more viscous, almost like paste, a paint ball mask would provide decent protection in a form that is designed to stay on your head, instead of something that was cobbled together that might come untied or slide off your face once you start swinging a weapon around and getting all sweaty.
If blood is getting that viscous from coagulation, then that means that the zombies are decaying, as such why worry about the zombie apocalypse? The whole ordeal is going to be over in a month, as no dead body can survive in open atmosphere for 4 weeks without either freezing, desiccating, or just plain rotting away (depending on the climate, but the first two would happen in a matter of days at most in respectively cold or hot environments).

Hell, seeing as most dead bodies (even underground) usually are too rotted or dried after one year underground to function, the total zombie forces on planet earth would number at less than 50 million (as 56 million is the total amount of deaths per year, and I'm assuming that any body getting close to a year isn't going to last one day in open atmosphere, as such it's not a realistic threat), as opposed to the 6.7 BILLION of the living. At that point the only advantage zombies had ever had in your standard Z-apocalypse setting (numbers) is completely non-existent, and against the combined firepower of the world's military (which includes tanks, airstrikes and flamethrowers) the undead hordes wouldn't even scratch the proverbial paint of humanity before being curbed-stomped into oblivion. So why even bother with dealing with weapons? Just fill the bathtub with water, board up your windows and doors, and you can literally wait out the end of days!

So yeah, either zombie apocalypse is going to be a short one indeed, or the dead have some way of ensuring that the body is capable of functioning long after death, in which case basic blood splatter will still be in effect, as such a paintball mask isn't going to be a reliable defense against potentially ingesting whatever is doing the zombifying.
 

exessmirror

New member
Apr 26, 2011
298
0
0
guns, to kill a zombie in melee you have to get uncomfortably close to their mouth. and an ranged weapon can fit an silencer and a scope in which no zombie can hear me if i am far enough. if they get to close i prefer an automatic weapon because if you are going to engage him chances are that he already told every zombie in a 500 meter radius where you are. when the zerg comes at me i just shoot. their muscle tissue will turn into paper and they will fall. if i actually have to use melee i will take a sharp machete because they don't need much maintenance(like a katana) and wont get easily stuck in zombie skull (like a crowbar or hatchet)
 

Ian Fan

New member
Dec 22, 2010
3
0
0
I'd like to change my answer to my quick wit. Intelligence is always the correct weapon to turn other mundane things INTO weapons.
 

JackandTom

New member
Nov 17, 2010
603
0
0
Well sadly I'm in the UK so guns aren't really an option. I have a baseball lying around somewhere and it's in pretty good condition, after all it's never been used for anything sport related. Another option could be to make some Dead Rising style makeshift weapons. With lawnmower blades and such...
 

exessmirror

New member
Apr 26, 2011
298
0
0
JackandTom said:
Well sadly I'm in the UK so guns aren't really an option. I have a baseball lying around somewhere and it's in pretty good condition, after all it's never been used for anything sport related. Another option could be to make some Dead Rising style makeshift weapons. With lawnmower blades and such...
it is really easy to get firearms in any country, if i would play my cards right i could own a gun in the UK within a week. i dont even live there

Ian Fan said:
I'd like to change my answer to my quick wit. Intelligence is always the correct weapon to turn other mundane things INTO weapons.
tell that to me when your plank with nails fail while i shoot those zombies up on 500 meters with silencer.

also to the ppl who say bows and crossbows have you ever used one, bows are really fucking hard to master, it takes me about 7 rounds from any firearm to give me the feel of. i used a bow once for a whole day and i couldn't hit a target 15 feet away. for crossbows do you know how long it takes to reload one. in the time you manage to get an other shot out of it i already am shooting out my second mag
 

lokicdn

New member
Sep 10, 2010
46
0
0
Well if L4D has taught me anything, it is that zombies can't resist blinking red lights. So a few thousand red leds, audible count down timers and enough materials to make handmade bombs, thank you very much.
 

Sevriux

New member
Aug 31, 2011
10
0
0
A sturdy metal bat, I know I wouldn't survive much but I would have a damn blast with the time I had. Just to kill one zombie with a bat to the head would complete me
 

EeveeElectro

Cats.
Aug 3, 2008
7,052
0
0
Caramel Frappe said:
Not sure if anyone ever thought about it, but how good are the zombie's senses? Because if they're average or lower.. I could blend in. Just tear my shirt up a bit, make an expression that fits right in with the zombies and follow them up in style. I could get anywhere and not draw attention to myself. However... if they're smart (how that is, I don't know) or have good senses, then-
Well it worked in Shaun of the Dead... lol.
Although in The Walking Dead they say the zombies can smell you if you're alive, so they cover themselves in zombie blood so they can go outside with the zombies...

OT: Considering I'm in the UK and getting near a gun will be pretty much impossible.
I'm better with melee anyway, and they're a lot quieter.
Get the broom and mop out!
 

JackandTom

New member
Nov 17, 2010
603
0
0
exessmirror said:
JackandTom said:
Well sadly I'm in the UK so guns aren't really an option. I have a baseball lying around somewhere and it's in pretty good condition, after all it's never been used for anything sport related. Another option could be to make some Dead Rising style makeshift weapons. With lawnmower blades and such...
it is really easy to get firearms in any country, if i would play my cards right i could own a gun in the UK within a week. i dont even live there
In a zombie apocalypse finding a dodgy backstreet dealer to sell me a gun (not to mention ammunition) would be the least of my worries.
 

Toy Yota

New member
Jul 7, 2012
35
0
0
Guns (more specifically, a sniper rifle for accuracy). Melee can be dangerous when fighting large amounts of zombies at once while guns allow you to maintain distance. Running out of ammunition won't guarantee danger since using guns as melee weapons aren't too bad. The only problem I see would be how to gain ammunition because I don't think people would be willing to share.
 

ElPatron

New member
Jul 18, 2011
2,130
0
0
erttheking said:
Ah for christ's sake can you just relax?
I'm chill as ice.

erttheking said:
last time I checked the point of guns was to propel small pieces of metal to puncture major organs and arteries and cause severe bleeding but the wounds that it cause are usually small and precise unless you're lugging around a .50 cal.
Guns can be messy as fuck. We all know the stereotypes in movies. Either they punch gigantic holes in humans and kick them 3m in the air, or they pierce a small clean hole.


In real life it's a very complicated subject.


erttheking said:
While it might cause enough pain to immobilize a normal Human
Nope.

Firearms are not very good man-stoppers if you're talking about handguns. Rifles will destroy the shit out of living tissue so they're a moot point.

Drugs, adrenaline... Most times it is needed more then one shot to bring a man down, and it's better to keep pulling the trigger until the target goes down.

Have you ever been seriously injured but without broken bones? Pain can be very slow at kicking in sometimes.


erttheking said:
in most media, zombies don't feel pain, so shooting them in the gut might kill them. but in the meantime they can still kill you.
Just like real humans.



erttheking said:
Yeah guns can cause damage to tendons, but as I said before, zombies don't care and will keep pushing their bodies to come after you until they are physically incapable of doing otherwise
I am not going to post the pics, but you should see what 5.56 does to a leg.

The X-ray shown that the bone was shattered, and the bullet didn't even touch it.




erttheking said:
and I'd like to think that a sledgehammer smashing your arm in half is going to do more damage than a handgun bullet.
Bullets also break bones. Sledgehammers force you to be at arm's reach.

I don't know what kind of zombies you are thinking off, but if a scratch is enough to spread the virus/bacteria/parasite you're a goner.

erttheking said:
Also a baseball bat counts as a good melee weapon, a single swing with it has been proven to be strong enough to shatter spines. If I have no training I shouldn't be holding a gun?...uh if the zombie apocalypse is around I'm using a gun if I have training or not
Have fun with your ND's killing other survivors. Anyway, as if baseball bats don't require training.

I never wielded one in my life. I seriously doubt I'll be able to learn how break bones in a jiffy.


erttheking said:
Also last time I checked, guns weren't used to break bones while sledgehammers and baseball bats were.
I used guns to mash potatoes, so what?

Sledgehammers and baseball bats are only used for their originals purpose. We all know that things can't have more than one purpose.

(points if anyone knows the reference)

erttheking said:
Also I like to call it a clip
I could say I liked to call you things that are not nice. Is that an excuse to insult people? No. It's still being rude.

You keep liking whatever you liked. The thing is, it was ignorant criminals that started that trend. Just saying.