I remember a similar thread with cis-this and cis-that options. I was very confused. I hate labels, especially the newer ones.
I'm a guy and I like girls.
I'm a guy and I like girls.
It most certainly is!Snowbell said:I'm an asexual but I'm still romantically attracted to men and have never considered dating a woman - is 'heteroromantic' a term?
Yes, I was aware that you are from (and were talking about) Sweden. I was saying that I hadn't had that experience in America, but that I'd heard other bisexual woman (mostly on the West Coast) complain about the same thing that you had mentioned. I've never been to Sweden, so I can't comment on the situation there (or anywhere aside from America - even when I've traveled abroad, I haven't exactly taken the time to examine the specific attitudes within the gay communities of other nations... although now that I type it, doing so sounds rather fascinating).Angelowl said:Not american, swedish.
The gist of it is pretty simple. Bisexual is attraction to male and female, where as pansexual is attraction to virtually anyone regardless of where they fall in the gender spectrum. (Male, Female, Trans, Cis, ect) And often times physical attraction doesn't play as large of a role in romantic interest as personality compatibility does. Basically like Bi, but more open and a few other different nuances.TheNewGuy said:I'm a bisexual cisgender male.
Hey, I have a question. What exactly is the difference between pansexuality and bisexuality? I know there is a difference, but I've never really been clear on what exactly it is. In fact I don't know much about pansexuality at all. Would you please elucidate me?
Am I missing something about the Escapist?Colour Scientist said:At the moment, asexuality is the second most popular option after heterosexuality.
Oh, Escapist, you never change.
Lieju said:Definitions kinda vary, but generally, a bisexual is someone who is attracted to both men and women, pansexual doesn't care what the gender or the sex of their partner is and can be attracted to people who are neither male nor female or to totally non-physical qualities.TheNewGuy said:Hey, I have a question. What exactly is the difference between pansexuality and bisexuality? I know there is a difference, but I've never really been clear on what exactly it is. In fact I don't know much about pansexuality at all. Would you please elucidate me?
Zachary Amaranth said:That's kind of a contentious deal. Some people say bisexual includes everything, and others say it includes male and female.
Pansexual is an identity based around the notion that bisexual is the latter, and thus pansexual fills the former niche. This is the problem with language: even the same words might be different.
I put bisexual, though I've been in relationships with an FTM (who was living as a woman, but still), another who thought they might be FTM, two people who fell in that nebulous sort of "genderqueer" category, and one woman who IDed as a woman but really wanted a penis. Depending on who you ask, any of the above my DQ me from bisexuality. Or they might not.
I've personally never been one to care about what bits people I liked had/wanted/felt they should have. It's not quite accurate to say I don't care, but I don't care in any meaningful sense that would stop me from dating/sleeping with one.
So the difference is either nothing or the difference between two points and all the points. It depends. I use bisexual in part because people react to the concept of pansexuality with a "special snowflake" mentality.
But then, given the number of people I've seen go "ew tranny!" even in the bi camp, maybe I am a special snowflake. >.<
Okay, that all makes sense. Sexuality can be really be complicated, huh?zama174 said:The gist of it is pretty simple. Bisexual is attraction to male and female, where as pansexual is attraction to virtually anyone regardless of where they fall in the gender spectrum. (Male, Female, Trans, Cis, ect) And often times physical attraction doesn't play as large of a role in romantic interest as personality compatibility does. Basically like Bi, but more open and a few other different nuances.
You're bi, guy![REDACTED said:]It most certainly is!Snowbell said:I'm an asexual but I'm still romantically attracted to men and have never considered dating a woman - is 'heteroromantic' a term?
OT: I can be sexually attracted to either gender (and even then, mostly to females), but I can't see myself getting into a relationship with another guy. Put myself down as heterosexual for the poll.
You should be ASHAMED. Are you saying that you have a problem with men?!Little Woodsman said:I'm a heterosexual male.
I can't help it! I was born this way!
I feel like this is a good moment to bring up the bisexual umbrella [http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2011/324/6/a/the_bisexual_umbrella_by_drynwhyl-d4gq9ji.jpg].Nurb said:You're bi, guy!Just with strong female romantic bias, but you'd probably fool around with the right guy, am I correct?
People think bisexual has to mean 50/50, but if you're attracted to both genders, regardless of what amount, you fall into the bisexual catagory.
There's a wide range of tastes under the "bi" catagory from romantic bias to sexual bias, where a person might enjoy sexual play with one gender but not have a desire for a romantic relationship. There's way more bi people than what one would think, but misconseptions sort of limit people's understanding.