Poll: Who is hotter? Poison Ivy or Harley Quinn?

[Katherine Kerensky]

-All Hail Britannia Snip-

I'm sick of people posting all these various kinds of sexuality because the original 3 just don't cut it any-more.

If you have a human body you will feel physical attraction. It's that simple. Unless you've had some batshit crazy surgery to remove your hypothalamus or some other hormone regulator. You're going to be chemically attracted to other peoples physical appearance. Even if you prize other qualities over them.

You are incorrect. Maybe you are the crazy one.
It is a rather simple fact that many people can understand (We're talking people here, the dumb sheep of humanity), and a fact that you will have to accept, or be left behind in you unaccepting ways.
I don't see why you can't understand something that naturally occurs. We nonsexuals exist. Get used to it. We don't need any 'batshit crazy surgery' to be like this, nor do we need hormone blockers (Although they can be rather fun).

 

[Antitonic]

...Yeah, anyway.

How can you say no to a girl with a giant hammer? It's essentially "love me, or get hit in the head".

 

[Katherine Kerensky]

-All Hail Lelouch Snip-
All hail Britannia?

I'm not saying people who are unattracted to people physically don't exist. I'm saying there would have to be a reason for that. Hormone irregularity is the best I can think off. And I severely doubt everyone who claims to be one over the internet actually is.

You'd be correct to doubt that everyone who claims to be nonsexual is. Yet we do exist, the ones who do not lie (After all, some people like to keep their honour as intact as possible >.>).
Perhaps it is a hormone irregularity, but that presupposes that there is such a thing as a 'regular' or 'normal' among humans. There is no 'normal', only 'accepted' and 'unaccepted'. Both exist, whether people like it or not.
People exist who are not sexually attracted to others, and completely lack in sexual feelings/urges. No matter what anyone thinks, that won't change. We're here until death. And death is hardly an obstacle to stop us nowadays.

 

[Katherine Kerensky]

-Yes, Your Highness Snip-

Why do you keep referencing code geas? Are you actually comparing me to lelouche?... I'd be cool with that.

I don't doubt that people like that exist. Just like I don't doubt that people can be born with 2 penis' or no fingers. Yadda yadda. There would still have to be a reason for it. And I automatically doubt anyone who throws it out as a flyby comment in an internet discussion that hardly relates to it at all.

It seems to be a rising fashion on here and it's fucking annoying. It doesn't make people interesting or whatever. Just genetically defective (sorry if that offends you but it's true.)

And by genetic standards. Yes there are accepted norms. When something deviates away from that norm it's a mutation. That can lead to a micro evolution. Or for a species to die out. Which the total inability to feel any form of attraction would. That's probably what's happening to pandas right now.

Nah, I just like the "All Hail!" lines and such.
I happily admit that I am genetically defective, but not because of being nonsexual.
But I can see why it would be offensive to call people genetically defective. Being nonsexual is no different to being heterosexual or homosexual, liking apples or oranges.
Except these people have no interest in apples or oranges, but can sample both if they give a damn.
Hmmm... one animé like what you said, with the dead-end of evolution such as this, would be Kashimashi: Girl meets Girl... interesting...
And I would have thought that mutations are generally the ones that can be seen, whether internal, or external. Whereas we cannot see the flow of hormones, or lack thereof, on a day-to-day basis without specialist equipment...
Well, perhaps we can only hope to go the way of the pandas, eh? Save everyone a lot of trouble.
Who knows, maybe this is how it is meant to be. We have had some time in the spotlight, time to leave the stage.