And we can make some excellent films, actually.Bobbity said:Because we're boring as shit, and we make incredibly bad films and video games. [sub]Well, maybe the last one isn't entirely true.[/sub]
I was exaggerating.Trolldor said:And we can make some excellent films, actually.Bobbity said:Because we're boring as shit, and we make incredibly bad films and video games. [sub]Well, maybe the last one isn't entirely true.[/sub]
Wolf Creek, for example.
There was Gallipoli, but I don't think all that much of it.Bobbity said:I was exaggerating.Trolldor said:And we can make some excellent films, actually.Bobbity said:Because we're boring as shit, and we make incredibly bad films and video games. [sub]Well, maybe the last one isn't entirely true.[/sub]
Wolf Creek, for example.There are some genuinely good Australian films, but the crap far outnumbers them.
OT again: I'd actually kind of like to see a video game following Aussie soldiers in WW1. I don't know that anyone would be interested in making it, but our soldiers had a reputation amongst of being violent, unpredictable savages, and it'd be amusing to see that going on in the context of the first World War.
Besides which, why do we never get any games based in that period of time? I know that if it was done in CoD style, the one shot rifles and crappy technology would make it boring as shit, but surely there must be a good way of doing it. I mean, it's not as if the first world war wasn't exciting or anything.[footnote]Well, the majority of it would have been boring as hell, but that's the way of all wars, I'm told. I meant the battles.[/footnote]
To be fair, before Wolf Creek I don't think I could have made that comment.Bobbity said:I was exaggerating.Trolldor said:And we can make some excellent films, actually.Bobbity said:Because we're boring as shit, and we make incredibly bad films and video games. [sub]Well, maybe the last one isn't entirely true.[/sub]
Wolf Creek, for example.There are some genuinely good Australian films, but the crap far outnumbers them.
OT again: I'd actually kind of like to see a video game following Aussie soldiers in WW1. I don't know that anyone would be interested in making it, but our soldiers had a reputation amongst of being violent, unpredictable savages, and it'd be amusing to see that going on in the context of the first World War.
Besides which, why do we never get any games based in that period of time? I know that if it was done in CoD style, the one shot rifles and crappy technology would make it boring as shit, but surely there must be a good way of doing it. I mean, it's not as if the first world war wasn't exciting or anything.[footnote]Well, the majority of it would have been boring as hell, but that's the way of all wars, I'm told. I meant the battles.[/footnote]
* Americans are the biggest market for games and they mystifyingly want games about themselves all the time, so that's what the market caters for. There's enough risks as it is publishing a big-budget game title, why take a further risky step by setting it somewhere your thickeared 11 year old audience can't relate to.Dylan Bonnett said:seriously why does america have to be the focus of every realistic modern shooter
Ugh, don't do that, as an Australian, hearing other Australians carry on like that is embarrasingly cringeworthy, it reminds me of Australian Neo-Nazis who just love saying that stuff while they're bashing asians.Dylan Bonnett said:I leave you with this AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE OI OI OI!
I think the biggest problem is how they would structure the battles. Hours upon hours of mindless boredom and then you get gassed and everyone dies. Or more bored staring off to space and suddenly 600 men half a mile away from you get out of the trench and run towards you only to be cut down by the Lewis gun 10 feet away from you. That battle sounds intense, but you can't base a game off of small things like that and hope for it to succeed. Each battle would be around 10 minutes and then everyone dies. Not much fun.Bobbity said:I was exaggerating.Trolldor said:And we can make some excellent films, actually.Bobbity said:Because we're boring as shit, and we make incredibly bad films and video games. [sub]Well, maybe the last one isn't entirely true.[/sub]
Wolf Creek, for example.There are some genuinely good Australian films, but the crap far outnumbers them.
OT again: I'd actually kind of like to see a video game following Aussie soldiers in WW1. I don't know that anyone would be interested in making it, but our soldiers had a reputation amongst of being violent, unpredictable savages, and it'd be amusing to see that going on in the context of the first World War.
Besides which, why do we never get any games based in that period of time? I know that if it was done in CoD style, the one shot rifles and crappy technology would make it boring as shit, but surely there must be a good way of doing it. I mean, it's not as if the first world war wasn't exciting or anything.
The Americian citizens wouldn't stand up for that they'ed over throw the government because of all the enviromental effects infact i think we're more caring arount the enviroment perhaps more than the 80's that aside it would ruin a good portion of the meat industry and the mining industry. even if that didn't hapen the amercain allies woudn't continue thus ending the war in our favour as we would get the sympathy card witch would make Australia look like the good guy and america will be flung of its high horse witch then would make world peace slightly easier because without that one country thinking its more than everyone else finally everyone could possibly be an equal to each other.ryai458 said:You can't beat America if we start losing we would nuke you till you glow.Dylan Bonnett said:by all means Australia doesn't have to be the good guy australia can join up with many other contrys that want america taken down a few notches.F said:Because America is actively picking fights, where as everybody loves Australians
very true good sir and think of the possibilitys this game if done right could tell what brave acts of bravery our countrys instead of what Americains have to tell witch have all heard before (whitch in my mind wasn't that much that i know of). hell if was good enough we could crack open a can of worms that could lead to games having nothing to do with AmericaFalseprophet said:Clearly my friend, a Canadian studio needs to team up with an Australian one, and make an FPS where the Canadian Corps and the ANZACs team up to win World War One, since we both did all the heavy lifting for the Commonwealth in that war.Dylan Bonnett said:but australia has a wealth of historic wars for example the ANZACS (Australia New Zealand Army Corps)witch fought in gallipoli and other battles. whitch is so memorable in Australian and New Zealand minds that it even has a cookie named after it or even a modern shooter made completely out of creativity sort of like 'Bulletstorm' minus the space marines.
so give me your thoughts or feelings about this I leave you with this AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE OI OI OI!
Oh sorry you misunderstood me, if america was losing the war and it looked like our country would be destroyed we would unleash our thousands of nuclear weapons and end civilization and all life on this little planet.Dylan Bonnett said:The Americian citizens wouldn't stand up for that they'ed over throw the government because of all the enviromental effects infact i think we're more caring arount the enviroment perhaps more than the 80's that aside it would ruin a good portion of the meat industry and the mining industry. even if that didn't hapen the amercain allies woudn't continue thus ending the war in our favour as we would get the sympathy card witch would make Australia look like the good guy and america will be flung of its high horse witch then would make world peace slightly easier because without that one country thinking its more than everyone else finally everyone could possibly be an equal to each other.ryai458 said:You can't beat America if we start losing we would nuke you till you glow.Dylan Bonnett said:by all means Australia doesn't have to be the good guy australia can join up with many other contrys that want america taken down a few notches.F said:Because America is actively picking fights, where as everybody loves Australians
very true good sir and think of the possibilitys this game if done right could tell what brave acts of bravery our countrys instead of what Americains have to tell witch have all heard before (whitch in my mind wasn't that much that i know of). hell if was good enough we could crack open a can of worms that could lead to games having nothing to do with AmericaFalseprophet said:Clearly my friend, a Canadian studio needs to team up with an Australian one, and make an FPS where the Canadian Corps and the ANZACs team up to win World War One, since we both did all the heavy lifting for the Commonwealth in that war.Dylan Bonnett said:but australia has a wealth of historic wars for example the ANZACS (Australia New Zealand Army Corps)witch fought in gallipoli and other battles. whitch is so memorable in Australian and New Zealand minds that it even has a cookie named after it or even a modern shooter made completely out of creativity sort of like 'Bulletstorm' minus the space marines.
so give me your thoughts or feelings about this I leave you with this AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE OI OI OI!