Depends on the book. If it's a first edition of a classic that has absolutely no other copies available then no, I'd leave it.
But if I needed to burn it to survive then I would, after all, in this digital age burning a book means nothing now. I can destroy a million books in half a second by simply loading them onto my hard drive and then deleting them. It doesn't really mean as much as it used to (or at least it shouldn't, since some people seem to think it's a big deal for some reason) since books are readily available and copies of them are extremely easy to get either online or in physical form simply because we now have the technology to mass-produce them to a much higher scale than we ever did in the past when book-burning was an issue.
However, burning books for ideological reasons is pretty stupid to me. Obviously it's a powerful visual message you're sending but it has no meaning whatsoever. It's just lazy as far as I'm concerned when you should be putting some effort into tearing the book to shreds with arguments against it in a constructive debate. That's far more effective and respectable, in my opinion.
EDIT: Nothing to add to my post, but I just noticed that this is my 881st post and this is the 88th comment. I just thought that was cute.
But if I needed to burn it to survive then I would, after all, in this digital age burning a book means nothing now. I can destroy a million books in half a second by simply loading them onto my hard drive and then deleting them. It doesn't really mean as much as it used to (or at least it shouldn't, since some people seem to think it's a big deal for some reason) since books are readily available and copies of them are extremely easy to get either online or in physical form simply because we now have the technology to mass-produce them to a much higher scale than we ever did in the past when book-burning was an issue.
However, burning books for ideological reasons is pretty stupid to me. Obviously it's a powerful visual message you're sending but it has no meaning whatsoever. It's just lazy as far as I'm concerned when you should be putting some effort into tearing the book to shreds with arguments against it in a constructive debate. That's far more effective and respectable, in my opinion.
EDIT: Nothing to add to my post, but I just noticed that this is my 881st post and this is the 88th comment. I just thought that was cute.