warmonkey said:
Just keep that in mind the next time the mean jocks punch your arm and knock the books out of your hands. You're just a geek, and you should like, totally do something to get some dignity and self-respect and stop nerding it up all over the place. Go join a team and exercise some time, tubby!
And this has relevence to anything said...why? Are you trying to make a point here? (if so then it's a very clumisy made and hard to understand one other than you apparantly equate someone believing that porn is degrading to jocks who beat up nerdy guys for being nerdy, not exactly a clear comparison to make).
Yes, I am calling you out for being a judgmental twat. What gives you the moral high ground, the right, to look down on them?
You do this, ironically, while coming across as something of a judgemental twat yourself.
What gives you the moral high ground, the right, to look down on him for possessing an opinion you happen to disagree with?
It does make it hard for you to legitimately call someone out on someone for holding contempt for someone when you not only
do exactly the same thing but actually go further than they do.
Whatever way you try to cut it you're being condescending
whilst berating someone for being condescending (you see where this falls apart?).
Christ, what reasoning could you even have for such an obnoxious opinion? Let's think this one through! You don't like sex. Or maybe you consider all sex and depictions thereof to be demeaning -- at least to the woman. That any woman who chooses to flaunt her sexuality, who chooses to allow images of her in the act of sex to be recorded and sold, is in fact debasing herself? That about right? Because sex is dirty, and women are used for sex? Am I hitting this out of the park or what.
That may be why or that could be you projecting and cold reading with such ferocity that you instill fear in even the bravest of powerpoint presentations and psychics.
Some people do believe that pornography is degrading (and they have their own valid reasons for it) just like some people believe that pornography is liberating (for their own valid reasons), just because you happen to disagree with someone doesn't nessercarily mean that they're wrong (pornography and the representation of sexuality for personal pleasure is something a complex issue with valid arguements on both sides).
Also, for the love of God, if you're going to try and convince someone to change their mind then try to steer clear of doing what is pretty much an open verbal attack on them (making small comical jabs at the silliness of what someone is saying is fine, no-one's saying you can't have a sense of humour, but going into what look like rage-filled rants about how someone must be a sexist pig who objectifies women just makes you sound like a *****).
PROTIP: Grow up, your opinions are straight out of 1586. Please base any statements you make on actual thought and reasoning and not just what older people told you to think. Your entire premise is based upon flawed and sexist foundations.
Wow! I can't believe the readings of self-rightiousness we're getting off of that statement! (it's off the charts!)
Am I right in assuming that you're one of those people who encourages free and open debate so long as everyone agree with what you say? (otherwise, fuck all them primative screw-heads and let their respective God sort 'em out?)
If you think what he has said is flawed then explain
why it is flawed, that's the only way you'll convince people to see things your way (the 'fling poo at the bastards like a monkey' technique isn't as effective as it is popular).
I really, really hope these girls make good game journalists and entertainers. I'd absolutely love it if they actually made a good site out of this, that just happened to also have boobs. I suspect it may fall short, but we'll just have to wait and see I guess. Simply because they're naked doesn't mean they're rubbish. Thing is, there's a million rubbish sites about games out there, and at least half as many that are fair -- and far fewer that are actually good. It's a bit presumptive and prejudiced to claim that simply because they'll be topless that they'll be compensating for not being quality.
Given how neither of them seem to have a history in writing or journalism (and I doubt they'll even have that much in the way of charisma or wit on camera, from what I hear people don't watch porn for the acting and memorable dialogue) I somehow doubt that they'll live up to much in the way of any actual informative entertainment (more likely we'll probably get a weakly scripted version of what we see everywhere else but this time with a pair of surgically enhanced 32G's for your viewing pleasure).
If this was a pair of gaming journalists and reporters who thought they'd add a funny twist to what they do by doing it naked then that'd probably hold more promise, as a couple of porn stars who seem to have had the bright idea of cashing in on the lonely, dateless nerd stereotype I get the feeling that this will probably amount to little more than a flimsy context to have girls get paid to flash their tits on webcam.