See though, its not what he does, it what the rest do after all of this!inFAMOUSCowZ said:as long as he doesnt pirate anything, he better win. Since the console is now his.
See though, its not what he does, it what the rest do after all of this!inFAMOUSCowZ said:as long as he doesnt pirate anything, he better win. Since the console is now his.
Maybe then they'll finally focus on what's important. Single player & local multi.Korten12 said:Like I said in another topic:
If they win they will say "Its just for homebrewing!"
5 days later PSN shuts down due too many hackers and pirates because its 'legal'.
Actually, Dragon Age 2 is forcing people to play the demo and GET an advanced demonstration before it releases the bonus items. The bonus items are only available if 1,000,000 people download AND play the demo. I do, however, understand the point you were makingDeshin said:I really have to ask.
When did we as a consumer base decide it was ok to hand over all our consumer rights and consumer privilages over to companies and let them dictate what we do and how we do it? Once upon a time the customer used to be the most powerful force going, you piss them off and your machine tanks, it was as simple as that. And the ever-daunting piracy looming over the companies's heads was a reminder not to publish crap; a quality-ensurance service in a way. But now the big boys throw their weight around, instead of fearing the consumer's wrath they bend the consumer over a pinball machine and go to town.
Now we have DRMs which are a hinderance to people who legally and legitimately purchased their games. We have first-day and pre-order DLC for games which force people to buy a game without any review or demonstration (I'm looking at you, Dragon Age 2). We have locked content on most disks that gets sold to us weeks later. Yet in all this massive shitstorm the generation has surely the fans would unite and speak up in outrage over how we're being treated. Yet no, all we get are apologists and fanboys, defending the actions under the guise of it's all to protect the almighty dollar/pound/yen and that's more important than actually treating customers fairly.
This is why games aren't considered art, because no art seeks to fuck over its consumers as much as video games do.
This is exactly how I feel about it. It isn't right for them to try and control what people do with their own property.Generic Gamer said:I know this is going to be abused, I just know that people are going to use this for piracy, maybe even this guy will.
However, in this case, I believe he is in the right. MacGyvering your own belongings is your right, you paid for the item so the physical item belongs to you. if I want to change a device's functionality it shouldn't be a crime, unless I then use that device to commit another crime. In that case the crime makes me a criminal.
Instead this time it's more like this: You pay for it, agree to the rules and then Sony says "Hahahaha, the rules have changed. Don't like it? Well, too bad".Mackheath said:You pay for it, you agree to the rules and to abide by them. Don't like it? Don't do it.
I'm more concerned about he consequences of console makers being able to sue whenever their hardware is used incorrectly. If Sony can keep getting away with it who will come next? What if Apple decides people are only allowed to install their first-party programs on a Mac? It could happen.DVS Storm said:This is not cool even though many will be like "Yay now I can hax with mah PS3". Has anyone thought of the consequences? Infinity Ward has stated(not sure about Treyarch) that they will close MW servers for PS3 if there are too many hackers there. No-one can control what someone does with their PS3 anymore because apparently PS network doesn't regognize a pirated game from a real one. It is really going to harm Sony and the gaming industry. Even though I'm a Xbox gamer I'm still worried because well who wants to invest to a big game when the gamers are just going to pirate it. And it could also mean DRM for PS3...Who knows(this whole post is just hypothetical but it's plausible.) But I think it is good that someone showed Sony that their system is not perfect.
maybe the plan has been to let steam take over the psn this whole time and sony is just going to use this whole thing as an excuse to bring it on along with the drm. im not crazy, just food for thought.Korten12 said:Well since SteamWorks (not the part that allows you to buy games, only cloud saves, updates, etc...) is coming to the PS3 with Portal 2, they might think that it might too be hacked.Hardcore_gamer said:What does STEAM have to do with this?Casual Shinji said:I'm sure even Valve is probably scratching themselves behind the head over this whole matter, with them putting Steam on PS3 and everything.Hardcore_gamer said:If Sony stops making money of PS online because everybody just downloads free shit then Sony will no longer have any reason to properly support the console anymore. Sure, the PS store won't just go away in a month, but in the long term this would mean inferior services in the future and generally less support from Sony (and perhaps other companies as well if other companies will also have to tolerate the hacking of their devices). Its amazing how extremely shortsighted the supporters of this jackass appear to be.
Very bad analogy, that's already painting the image of a criminal before the fact. Here's a better one:Awexsome said:So the guy finds the keys to the jail cells... then gives the keys to the inmates and won't claim he did anything wrong because he's not telling the inmates what to use them for?
Steamworks shouldn't be affected by this, after all, it's already available on the PC. If you were going to hack it, you'd do it there.Casual Shinji said:I'm not very well-versed in the art of hacking so I don't know how far the rootkey hack is going to reach for the PS3. But since Valve is putting Steamworks on the PS3, I'm sure they're not too happy about this whole situation. Though maybe it won't cause them any problems at all. Like I said, I'm just a layman.
Not that, the thing they had before about the "Signature edition" or something like that. More or less if you pre-ordered it in 2010 (when all we had was CGI cutscenes and empty promises (just like DA1!)) you'd get a "bonus" character and a few other in game things which are probably going to be on the disk anyway and unlockable after a few months after paying X amount of points.Nikki_Viper said:Actually, Dragon Age 2 is forcing people to play the demo and GET an advanced demonstration before it releases the bonus items. The bonus items are only available if 1,000,000 people download AND play the demo. I do, however, understand the point you were making
... YES, IT IS! It is well within his legal right to do what he wants with the product he's purchased. That IS how the world works. Sony's lawsuit aginst him is questionable at best and downright illegal at worst. SheeshMazty said:If you buy a gun is it your right to do anything you want with it? Is it your right to do anything you want with a PC? No, you have to abide by the laws and rules. Simple as that.
All this talk condoning Sony is naive jibberish. Geohotz simply allowed pirating to occur on the PS3. That means developers and publishers lose out because some kid thinks it's his god-given right to do what he wants. Sorry, that's not how the world works.
If any company pisses you off grow some balls and stop buy their stuff. Tell them why you are pissed so they know. Hell, find people that feel the same way and start making some noise.Deshin said:I really have to ask.
When did we as a consumer base decide it was ok to hand over all our consumer rights and consumer privilages over to companies and let them dictate what we do and how we do it? Once upon a time the customer used to be the most powerful force going, you piss them off and your machine tanks, it was as simple as that. And the ever-daunting piracy looming over the companies's heads was a reminder not to publish crap; a quality-ensurance service in a way. But now the big boys throw their weight around, instead of fearing the consumer's wrath they bend the consumer over a pinball machine and go to town.
Now we have DRMs which are a hinderance to people who legally and legitimately purchased their games. We have first-day and pre-order DLC for games which force people to buy a game without any review or demonstration (I'm looking at you, Dragon Age 2). We have locked content on most disks that gets sold to us weeks later. Yet in all this massive shitstorm the generation has surely the fans would unite and speak up in outrage over how we're being treated. Yet no, all we get are apologists and fanboys, defending the actions under the guise of it's all to protect the almighty dollar/pound/yen and that's more important than actually treating customers fairly.
This is why games aren't considered art, because no art seeks to fuck over its consumers as much as video games do.
Are you honestly saying buying and maintaining a house is the exact same circumstance, both legally and ethically, as owning a video games console?ragethebeast said:Correct me if i'm wrong, but itsn't this just like buying a house?
I mean you buy a house and pay if off, but you still have to pay for it and even more you have to abide by city codes... its your house but the city can tell you how long your grass can be, what color your house can be and if you don't do this they fine the hell out of you. no matter if your 3 inch grass was okay when you bought the house... now you need 2 inch grass and you need to repaint your house... its the same deal and no one complains like a whiny ***** like geohot is doing.
It's more analogous to buying a house and having the realtor (sp), after purchase, sue you for adding on a deck, or planting a garden in the back. The government isn't the one telling him what he can or can't do with his system, Sony is.ragethebeast said:Correct me if i'm wrong, but itsn't this just like buying a house?
I mean you buy a house and pay if off, but you still have to pay for it and even more you have to abide by city codes... its your house but the city can tell you how long your grass can be, what color your house can be and if you don't do this they fine the hell out of you. no matter if your 3 inch grass was okay when you bought the house... now you need 2 inch grass and you need to repaint your house... its the same deal and no one complains like a whiny ***** like geohot is doing.
Ummm... I am pretty sure it is against the law to take the gun which you acquired legally and use it to hold up a liquor store, or murder some one with it, or shoot puppies in the head with it.Deshin said:... YES, IT IS! It is well within his legal right to do what he wants with the product he's purchased. That IS how the world works. Sony's lawsuit aginst him is questionable at best and downright illegal at worst. SheeshMazty said:If you buy a gun is it your right to do anything you want with it? Is it your right to do anything you want with a PC? No, you have to abide by the laws and rules. Simple as that.
All this talk condoning Sony is naive jibberish. Geohotz simply allowed pirating to occur on the PS3. That means developers and publishers lose out because some kid thinks it's his god-given right to do what he wants. Sorry, that's not how the world works.