JDKJ said:
Thedek said:
If what I am lead to believe is correct then they were warned prior to this about their shitty network security.
Proof. If this video is indeed legitimate.
Do you understand who failOverflow are and their conduct in relation to Sony and their relationship to Sony? You really expect Sony to take what a group of hackers who were (and I believe that some individual members still are) defendants in a lawsuit brought by Sony? That's like taking home security advice from the guy who just broke into your house and stole your flat-screen television. Not that the advice isn't credible. Just that the source isn't. I'm not gonna be the one heard to say, "Yeah, the guy that I'm suing just told me . . . and I'm taking his word for it."
Would the guy who just picked your crap tastic locks not be able to point you towards better ones?
It's like... the person broke into your house, felt so bad they didn't even take anything. Relocked everything and called you back up later to inform you how not to be an idiot about security.
Besides.... These guys took what from Sony? It sounded like they just wanted to put linux or something on there, got annoyed when they were told they couldn't, and figured out how they could. It's hardly malignant behavior. Geohotz seemed a lot more of an asshole about it.
It's like a guy kicking your ass in a video game, and informing you how to
NOT suck. How does that constitute that guy being incorrect or wrong. Though as said Geo came across as a royal twat. These guys seemed much more civil. If they didn't do anything against Sony themselves they certainly have a point.
Besides you don't need to listen to exact what the person said. You just realize that they broke through your shit easily, and you get new shit, just not the ones they suggested.
It seems the world to me that Sony just had blinders on, head in the sand, head up their asses, went "nah! nah! nah! I'M NOT LISTENING TO YOU!!" about the whole thing.