One of the most polarizing shows on television. Half the people who watch it think it's the voice of a generation, the other half want to hang Lena Dunham up by her neck.DevilWithaHalo said:There's a show called "Girls"? OMG sexism! (Seriously, never heard of it, I'll check it out)
Couldn't find the scene, but here's a tedious blow by blow discussion of the controversy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gyyVmRQNMQ
Oh wait, the scene is in the clip. Hurrah! Well, most of it anyway. They chopped it up a bit.
PS - If you want my opinion, it wasn't "rape" per se, but it wasn't cool either. It existed in that problematic grey area that makes discussions about the subject so troubling and difficult. Can't decide if that's because the writing was really good, or really oblivious.
Of course you can. It's not evidence that being offended is wrong, or that it's not worthy of discussion when issues of offense arise.DevilWithaHalo said:To illustrate that you can take offense at everything; like being offended that people are easily offended. It's quite offending.
=\DevilWithaHalo said:What's wrong with Robocop? It's a classic!
A trope CAN be evidence of a prevailing attitude. It can also be evidence of laziness or lack of creativity. If there was a long history of games with, say, black slave characters, I might use it as evidence in a thesis that the game industry has a racism problem. It's not really an outrageous assertion, and I've never really been clear why the discussion around sexism in gaming keeps making people throw a strop.DevilWithaHalo said:True. I just don't see how she justifies it's support toward negative attitudes toward women and inherently misogynist ideas. Tropes are an explanation for something which already exists; they don't really do anything.