I played for a few hours before going to sleep last night(this morning) and I'm enjoying myself. I did select the Wild Wasteland perk even though I don't really know what to expect to come from it.
This quotation isn't relevant but I wish to ask a question if I may:Russ Pitts said:That's it.Sovvolf said:I think I can see where your coming from here. Though correct my presumptuous arse if I'm wrong on this one. Your saying that, Fallout 3 broke enough new ground that your can forgive a few bugs getting through, no big deal, it happens. However with Fallout New Vegas being a sequel built (more then likely) on the same engine, you can't excuse the same glitches getting through the door twice. These bugs should have been none existent in the sequel.Russ Pitts said:Fair enough. As a reviewer, it's easier for me to overlook minor bugs (and in a game with the scope and scale of Fallout 3, yes I think they were minor) if they come with a game that breaks as much ground as Fallout 3. We didn't give scores in 2008, but Fallout 3 would have gotten 5 stars from me, and I stand by that. Those same bugs, however, are harder to excuse in a follow up title.
Again I could be wrong on this however that's the way I'd have looked at it and yes I would have docked a point of for it too.
This is my main problem as well, a few glitches wouldn't be so bad but the fact that you can't finish certain missions cause the game crashes is a HUGE killing point to me. I think I might have to pass on this game.Tiswas said:hmmmm. I'm kinda on the fence about this one now.
While I was all excited for the new humour and atmos in this one. The thing about the bugs has me doubtful about whether it's worth the price tag. All of those problems were what killed Fallout 3's enjoyment for me so much so towards the end. Especially considering it had been out a while and no patch.
Hopefully it'll be patched quickly, else I'll just pick it up for a tenner pre-owned in a years time.
In a game as large as Fallout 3, I cannot really fault Bethesda for not finding the bugs upon release. It simply is not reasonable to assume they could without granting them near unlimited resources. Of course, that such a game launches with bugs is expected. That such a game kept the bugs around indefinitely is rather shameful.nipsen said:"It's disappointing to see such an otherwise brilliant and polished game suffer from years-old bugs, and unfortunately our review score for the game has to reflect that."
Because when Fallout 3 launched and had the same game-breaking bugs, you really couldn't be bothered with that kind of petty thing, I guess. Good job finding your principles in a bag somewhere, though. Well done. Stars in the margins. *thumbs*
Sold for me as well. Thats just too funny to pass up.Lono Shrugged said:Ok the Indiana Jones and Crystal Skull reference has sold it to me. For anyone who doesn't know Indy survived an Atomic blast by hiding in a 1950's fridge. And everyone from fans to realism critics threw a hissy fit. Very nice subtle joke and they are always the best
Russ, I think that the man in the fridge was a reference to Indiana Jones. I don't suppose it was a fedora, was it?Russ Pitts said:Review: Fallout: New Vegas
A funnier, more colorful, more hardcore Fallout awaits you in the Mojave Wasteland.
Read Full Article
..that is a very tall order, you know..Russ Pitts said:but lay off the sarcasm next time and we'll get off on a better foot.