Rumor: Batman: Arkham Origins Will Add Multiplayer

Mikeyfell

Elite Member
Aug 24, 2010
2,784
0
41
Abandon4093 said:
Mikeyfell said:
Abandon4093 said:
It costs money to fund the work, obviously. But that doesn't mean they're sacrificing anything from the singleplayer.

The singleplayer will carry on being made, uninterrupted as normal.

Where people have got this notion from that multiplayer development somehow effects the singleplayer is completely beyond me. If development focuses shift, then yea. It will have an effect. But these games are coming out with tacked on multiplayers, not tacked on single players like Battlefield etc.

The focus is still on the singleplayer. The existence of a multiplayer in no way effects anything else.

uh... I, uh... Are you having fun with this?

I'm really glad you have infinite money and workers who can do multiple things at once without sacrificing proficiency.
Stopped reading there.

As I've said countless times now, separate teams for separate jobs. No one will be doing multiple things at once.
Separate teams do separate jobs.
Everyone gets paid
Boss has finite money

Where is your major malfunction?
 

neppakyo

New member
Apr 3, 2011
238
0
0
What I hate is when MP interferes with SP.

Like in ME3, you need to play MP in order to get the full war readiness, or whatever you call it. Sucks for people with OCD and hates/can't play MP. "Must. get.. everything.. in.. game!" (I'll leave out how shitty ME3 was, no need to turn this into the BW forums >.> )

I prefer SP games. I don't like MP. Only MP I really play is STO, cause I can ignore people when I want, and it doesn't affect my game experience.

As to RS not developing the 3rd one.. No thanks. I'll skip it.