Rumor: Microsoft Killed PC/Xbox Cross Platform Play

steamweedlegoblin

New member
Apr 28, 2010
185
0
0
That's why I don't play shooters on consoles. Sure, some people have freakish precision reflexes in their thumbs. Whatever. I'm not one of them and don't aspire to be. I do, however, have precision reflexes with a mouse. I'm not saying that the PC is better than consoles. I'm saying that I am better on the PC than I would be on a console.
 

Timbydude

Crime-Solving Rank 11 Paladin
Jul 15, 2009
958
0
0
This is basically why I stopped buying console FPS's if they were on PC too. Aiming is just too annoying on a gamepad.

If you're actually holding a gun, you would be able to jerk your arm as fast as you want (to a certain extent) to the exact location you need. The mouse best simulates that over a thumbstick.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Ironic Pirate said:
But in fast paced games, console gamers would have a mobility advantage, as WASD isn't all that great for movement...
Mirror's Edge blows that out of the water, it was exponentially better on the PC then the consoles.

Besides, PC's do allow for controller input.

EDIT: Oh, I see you've admitted defeat. All right, then.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
Ironic Pirate said:
Okay, what I meant by that, is that the analog stick is slightly more natural to movement, it's an "analog" to moving. The people in the videos are moving fast, yes, I realize that. I'm not much of a PC gamer, and when I've seen friends play it they tended to get stuck on corners a bit more.

I thought that meant this was a bit more common then it apparently was, and made a post based on that. Apparently my friends just suck, or maybe that game did.

No hard feelings, right?
I'll give you that, if have gotten stuck on corners on PC quite more often than on consoles (usually back peddling and I can't just "jiggle" around the door frame), but even though I started as a console gamer I just find mouse-look so much more natural than analogue look. With analogue-stick look I feel like I'm controlling an Anti-aircraft gun rather than the personal weapons an actual person or living creature.

I would be fine if all console games I played a robot or some other obviously mechanical persona (like a helicopter's motorised gun turret) but often I'm cast as a space marine or special forces soldier. Even Tomb Raider I rather play with Mouse + keyboard, just to look around naturally with the mouse.

But overall I find WASD on a keyboard just has too many tricks up it's sleeve for me to actually prefer a stick+mouse option, even if it was available.
 

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
Treblaine said:
There was never a golden age of PC gaming, at least no more than there is today. (peak of 2.3 million Steam users every day, against peak 2.2 million Xbox Live Gold users)

Home consoles have ALWAYS been more popular in seer numbers at least as they are simply easier to market and in fact their entire business model is based around getting the most number of units out there.

PC gaming practically by it's definition is for smaller, niche market and offering better performance. Just like surround-sound, it's hard to set up and can get very expensive (if you don't buy smart) though it is still better than plain old built in stereo-speakers/set-standard-consoles.

Ironic Pirate said:
But in fast paced games, console gamers would have a mobility advantage, as WASD isn't all that great for movement...
Really? Sure that is an inherent thing or rather a matter of familiarity with one or another.

For zig-zagging it is easy to hold-W and alternate tapping between A and D. You have three fine fingers for movement rather than 1 thumb. Circle strafing too is very easy with WASD and though have a thumb ALWAYS on space bar ready to jump, and a pinkie ALWAYS ready to sprint/crouch.

Take a look at this example:

This IS the PC version of MW2, this player sprints and while holding-W (run forward) but by very quickly flicking the mouse left-to-right this is a very fast zig-zag that even head on is very hard to hit. And then he face-knife stabs 'em. You just can't change directions as quick with a thumbstick and simultaneously have in any way workable stick-sensitivity.

An analogue stick only really has an advantage with racing games where you need very subtle and continuous adjustments to turning... but whether Console or PC you are best to get an actual wheel and pedals.
Yeah, I realize that now, someone else posted such a video.

My experience with PC gaming has been either my horrid attempts or watching my friends, and they always seemed to get stuck on corners more than people did with consoles. I thought that was a common problem, I guess they just weren't very good.

And I've always felt the analog stick was more intuitive. It only took up one digit, and, you know, it's an "analog" for movement.

I was wrong, though.
 

warmonkey

New member
Dec 2, 2009
84
0
0
And yet the console kids seem to constantly be crying about wanting to use their gamepads to play every PC game ever created under the sun, which I still just don't understand.

kb+mouse > gamepad, end of story. More precise aiming, faster aiming, and I doubt you can bhop or strafe jump with a gamepad
 

Pilkingtube

Edible
Mar 24, 2010
481
0
0
dogstile said:
vrbtny said:
Yes!!! I feel proud to be a PC gamer, we are now proven (Sorta-Officially) to be better than those console playing turds(To quote Yahtzee)..

No offense(Much) to Console gmaers...
Say no offence all you like, we all know what you meant :p

I call them out on this though. Every game of shadowrun i watched my mate play he destroyed the PC players. So, exaggeration?
That.. and with Shadowrun they artifically lagged PC players, and off-set the crosshairs and aiming of people using the PC to make it harder to shoot ;)
 

Eliam_Dar

New member
Nov 25, 2009
1,517
0
0
What about other Genres...RTS excluded. Driving games for example could have maintained the cross platform capabilities, also simulators, some RPGs, sport games, etc. I think there was anoter motive for that.

It is true that in FPS games with no artificial lagging, PC Has the advantage, imagine for a momment cross platform in TF2...most console gamers would be destroyed in seconds.
 

Fearzone

Boyz! Boyz! Boyz!
Dec 3, 2008
1,241
0
0
That... and also if put in the same chat room with PC gamers, console gamers might have learned of the all around superior experience that PC gaming has to offer. Even with more development efforts thrown and consoles these days, even the "good" games on consoles are mostly just throwaway crap.
 

Antiparticle

New member
Dec 8, 2008
835
0
0
Gildan Bladeborn said:
Antiparticle said:
Logan Westbrook said:
Sood sources claim that the Microsoft pitted the best console players using control pads against "mediocre" PC gamers with mice and keyboards and found that the console players were "destroyed every time."
This seems highly unlikely to me. But it'll be music to the ears of the PC elitists of course...
I can't really comment on the veracity of this fellow's statements, or whether there would have been a PC renaissance had cross-platform connectivity remained on the table, but the disparity between the best console FPS players vs mediocre PC FPS players has been demonstrated before - staff from Official X-Box magazine challenged staff members of PC Gamer to a Halo competition.

Now Halo isn't cross-platform interactive, but since there was a PC port and it allowed you to plug in and use the X-Box controller, they could essentially simulate the console vs PC experience, while also eliminating any niggling doubt about hardware discrepancies, as the machines themselves were identical and only the control method differed. Using that setup, the team of extremely experienced Halo players from X-Box Magazine, who knew the maps in and out and played Halo Deathmatch all the time... were handily trounced by a team consisting of Halo newbies, it was a one-sided pouncing match for the folks using mice.

Gamepads are simply an inferior control option when the title in consideration is an FPS - developers program in all sorts of behind the scenes "cheats" to counterbalance how analog sticks are a terrible option for precisely aiming at things, and even if the game presents you with options to turn aiming assistance off it will still leave the rest of the tricks it's using to counterbalance your shitty aim in place - the alternative is a game that is basically unplayable and no fun for anyone.

Which is fine really, consoles are an active market segment and FPS titles are quite popular on consoles, irrespective of their interfaces not really being well designed to play them. But when you pit people who have mastered the art of distance running by walking on their hands against regular old marathon runners who use their legs for the purpose of locomotion, only a crazy person would conclude that running along by balancing on your hands upside down is going to put you at an advantage against people running normally - you're going to lose, badly.

Which is why more FPS games aren't made that let people on the PC compete with people on the X-Box, and why the ones that have employed coding tricks to try and 'gimp' the PC players - it's the only way to (somewhat) level the playing field if one side is stuck using an analog stick to aim - there's a good reason we don't all have joysticks sitting to one side of our keyboards instead of mice.
Yah, well, I still have a hard time believing the control method could make that much of a difference. If you'd tell me pro PC players could beat pro console players, fine, I'll believe that, but to say that the best console players were destroyed every time by mediocre PC players... I just don't see control method making THAT much of a difference. Unless they did something weird, such as setting the console players' controllers to the default (fairly) low sensitivity and not allowing them to raise it or something. If the console players were really pro they should have at least been able to put up a good fight.
 

Alandoril

New member
Jul 19, 2010
532
0
0
Maybe it sucks for fps games, but cross platform play would be awesome for rpgs and co-op campaigns.
 

Im Nightmare

New member
Mar 16, 2010
70
0
0
Zhukov said:
Y'know what? If this is true, then I'm glad it happened.

I have sampled the madness that is XBL. I've seen the people who dwell there.

I don't think I want those people in my PC games. Errg.
Funny, I have played alot of TF2 lately on my PC. The people I play with on there are just as bad if not worse than the 360 kiddies. Cause well there older and they act like a freaking 10 year old...
 

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Antiparticle said:
If the console players were really pro they should have at least been able to put up a good fight.
Oh, I'm sure they did their best.

 

Korten12

Now I want ma...!
Aug 26, 2009
10,766
0
0
vrbtny said:
Yes!!! I feel proud to be a PC gamer, we are now proven (Sorta-Officially) to be better than those console playing turds(To quote Yahtzee)..

No offense(Much) to Console gmaers...
you say no offense put the whole post you just did was being a total elitist.

Milky_Fresh said:
Good job Logan, you feed those elitists.
my thoughts exactly... This topic is going to bring a whole flame war.
 

Korten12

Now I want ma...!
Aug 26, 2009
10,766
0
0
Antiparticle said:
Gildan Bladeborn said:
Antiparticle said:
Logan Westbrook said:
Sood sources claim that the Microsoft pitted the best console players using control pads against "mediocre" PC gamers with mice and keyboards and found that the console players were "destroyed every time."
This seems highly unlikely to me. But it'll be music to the ears of the PC elitists of course...
I can't really comment on the veracity of this fellow's statements, or whether there would have been a PC renaissance had cross-platform connectivity remained on the table, but the disparity between the best console FPS players vs mediocre PC FPS players has been demonstrated before - staff from Official X-Box magazine challenged staff members of PC Gamer to a Halo competition.

Now Halo isn't cross-platform interactive, but since there was a PC port and it allowed you to plug in and use the X-Box controller, they could essentially simulate the console vs PC experience, while also eliminating any niggling doubt about hardware discrepancies, as the machines themselves were identical and only the control method differed. Using that setup, the team of extremely experienced Halo players from X-Box Magazine, who knew the maps in and out and played Halo Deathmatch all the time... were handily trounced by a team consisting of Halo newbies, it was a one-sided pouncing match for the folks using mice.

Gamepads are simply an inferior control option when the title in consideration is an FPS - developers program in all sorts of behind the scenes "cheats" to counterbalance how analog sticks are a terrible option for precisely aiming at things, and even if the game presents you with options to turn aiming assistance off it will still leave the rest of the tricks it's using to counterbalance your shitty aim in place - the alternative is a game that is basically unplayable and no fun for anyone.

Which is fine really, consoles are an active market segment and FPS titles are quite popular on consoles, irrespective of their interfaces not really being well designed to play them. But when you pit people who have mastered the art of distance running by walking on their hands against regular old marathon runners who use their legs for the purpose of locomotion, only a crazy person would conclude that running along by balancing on your hands upside down is going to put you at an advantage against people running normally - you're going to lose, badly.

Which is why more FPS games aren't made that let people on the PC compete with people on the X-Box, and why the ones that have employed coding tricks to try and 'gimp' the PC players - it's the only way to (somewhat) level the playing field if one side is stuck using an analog stick to aim - there's a good reason we don't all have joysticks sitting to one side of our keyboards instead of mice.
Yah, well, I still have a hard time believing the control method could make that much of a difference. If you'd tell me pro PC players could beat pro console players, fine, I'll believe that, but to say that the best console players were destroyed every time by mediocre PC players... I just don't see control method making THAT much of a difference. Unless they did something weird, such as setting the console players' controllers to the default (fairly) low sensitivity and not allowing them to raise it or something. If the console players were really pro they should have at least been able to put up a good fight.
See but thats what PC only gamers believe, they believe that it is impossible for a console gamer to win, now of course it would be harder to win, but it doesnt mean that Pro Console gamers would lose to mediocre PC playes. Seeing as it also still depends on how you play the game itself, not just what your using to play.

I agree with you.