Well actually there might be a very good reason for this.Doctadoone said:The thing I found most, shall we say annoying about the fights, is that when they swung the lightsabers, it looked like a broadsword. As in, it had a heavy heft to it. Lightsabers, lorewise, were so light and so unlike other melee weapons, that they took so long to master. I think they had it backwards in the movie, the swings were slow where they should have been fast. If they wanted to show inexperience they could have swung the blade too far, leaving themselves open.
TLDR: The swings should have been much faster for the weight of the weapon, they looked too slow.
Erm...What?Happyninja42 said:Only one person That we know of. There is a lot of theory going around thatGethsemani said:In fact, only one of the three lightsaber wielders have any prior experience with using a lightsaber and is also the only one who might have had any sort of formal training with them.Devin Barker said:Yah... because none of the people in this movie were trained by masters... the fights in eps 4,5, and 6 were slow too. Lightsaber dules are a "lost art" at this point. I actually thought the film did a great job of bridging the fights between the orig trig and prequels.Rey is a hidden padawan that survived Kylo Ren's purge
And thus might also have had training. Speculation I know, but it's a possibility, and your statement is definitely accurate based on the information provided in the movie by itself.
OT: Yes, please let's let them look entirely choreographed and fake like the fighting in Eps 1-3, good call Mr. Jackson. *rolls eyes*
I think he's saying, and I agree, that the prequel fights while at times fun and energetic. There was a campy, cartoonish element which undercuts the tension a bit ironically episode one's Darth Maul fight was the only one that felt like it had any stakes. While you could kind of rationalize it by saying that the Prequel trilogy Jedi were formally trained and polished so their technique was more graceful and fancy looking, the light saber duels had weight to them, and borrowed much more from episode 5 than anything else but added an element of realism and aggression to the action. Kylo was much more menacing than episode 3's Aniken simply because all his swings with his light saber had a presence, where as Aniken looked like he was swinging a toy and floating around.RealRT said:Yup, completely agree with Jackson here. If you can't have a good lightsaber duel, don't have one at all.You could do way worse with way superior-looking duels? That's an interesting oxymoron you got there.Casual Shinji said:For a highly choreographed dance routine... No, it wasn't very impressive.
For a fight to the death though, you could do way worse... like the Prequels.
This is pure speculation based on the flash of images in her vision butBuizel91 said:Erm...What?Happyninja42 said:Only one person That we know of. There is a lot of theory going around thatGethsemani said:In fact, only one of the three lightsaber wielders have any prior experience with using a lightsaber and is also the only one who might have had any sort of formal training with them.Devin Barker said:Yah... because none of the people in this movie were trained by masters... the fights in eps 4,5, and 6 were slow too. Lightsaber dules are a "lost art" at this point. I actually thought the film did a great job of bridging the fights between the orig trig and prequels.Rey is a hidden padawan that survived Kylo Ren's purge
And thus might also have had training. Speculation I know, but it's a possibility, and your statement is definitely accurate based on the information provided in the movie by itself.
OT: Yes, please let's let them look entirely choreographed and fake like the fighting in Eps 1-3, good call Mr. Jackson. *rolls eyes*
How old is Rey meant to be? Ep 7 is 30 years after ep 6, she looks nowhere near over 30!
Happyninja42 said:This is pure speculation based on the flash of images in her vision butBuizel91 said:Erm...What?Happyninja42 said:Only one person That we know of. There is a lot of theory going around thatGethsemani said:In fact, only one of the three lightsaber wielders have any prior experience with using a lightsaber and is also the only one who might have had any sort of formal training with them.Devin Barker said:Yah... because none of the people in this movie were trained by masters... the fights in eps 4,5, and 6 were slow too. Lightsaber dules are a "lost art" at this point. I actually thought the film did a great job of bridging the fights between the orig trig and prequels.Rey is a hidden padawan that survived Kylo Ren's purge
And thus might also have had training. Speculation I know, but it's a possibility, and your statement is definitely accurate based on the information provided in the movie by itself.
OT: Yes, please let's let them look entirely choreographed and fake like the fighting in Eps 1-3, good call Mr. Jackson. *rolls eyes*
How old is Rey meant to be? Ep 7 is 30 years after ep 6, she looks nowhere near over 30!
We see an image of Kylo Ren and the Rentastics apparently murdering the padawans. This is established by other characters that he did this, and it's why Luke leaves. AFTER that scene is shown, we are shown a 6ish year old Rey being left behind on Jakku. For some people, myself included this implies she was a survivor of Ren's purge, and they secreted her away so he wouldn't kill her. And while the movie is 30 years later, that doesn't mean that Luke immediately started training kids after the credits rolled. It's perfectly feasible that he would have to spend several years looking for new recruits, finding a suitable training site, and then starting the training. The training likely went on for several years before Kylo Ren killed them. It's not like he showed up on the first day of jedi school and was like "lulz! I'mma kill all of you!" He'd clearly been training for a while.
Consult your local ophtalmologist about that.Gundam GP01 said:What duels? I didnt see any duels in the prequels.
Also, boring as fuck to watch.The Rogue Wolf said:They weren't superior-looking to me. More acrobatic, sure, but it looked like they were trying to impress each other with giant glowsticks. The fight in TFA looked like they were actually trying to kill each other with weapons.
First of all - "realism". By God, does it make me facepalm. We're watching superpowered space knights duke it out with energy swords. What realism are you talking about? Second, since when did "realistic" become synonymous with "good"? Reality sucks. That's why we use escapist entertainment. Third: it wasn't interesting to watch. In the prequels I can appreciate the complexity of choreography and the dexterity of performers. Here? Nothing of worth to look at.Kameburger said:I think he's saying, and I agree, that the prequel fights while at times fun and energetic. There was a campy, cartoonish element which undercuts the tension a bit ironically episode one's Darth Maul fight was the only one that felt like it had any stakes. While you could kind of rationalize it by saying that the Prequel trilogy Jedi were formally trained and polished so their technique was more graceful and fancy looking, the light saber duels had weight to them, and borrowed much more from episode 5 than anything else but added an element of realism and aggression to the action. Kylo was much more menacing than episode 3's Aniken simply because all his swings with his light saber had a presence, where as Aniken looked like he was swinging a toy and floating around.
Realism or not, a fight should feel like a fight.RealRT said:First of all - "realism". By God, does it make me facepalm. We're watching superpowered space knights duke it out with energy swords. What realism are you talking about? Second, since when did "realistic" become synonymous with "good"? Reality sucks. That's why we use escapist entertainment. Third: it wasn't interesting to watch. In the prequels I can appreciate the complexity of choreography and the dexterity of performers. Here? Nothing of worth to look at.
Weren't you the one saying realism sucks?Oh, by the way.
>added weight
It's an energy blade. It has no weight.
Well, I guess we have a different idea of effort - in my book, everyone who goes though that many flips and parries and what not is putting quite a bit of effort in order to defeat their opponent.Casual Shinji said:Realism or not, a fight should feel like a fight.RealRT said:First of all - "realism". By God, does it make me facepalm. We're watching superpowered space knights duke it out with energy swords. What realism are you talking about? Second, since when did "realistic" become synonymous with "good"? Reality sucks. That's why we use escapist entertainment. Third: it wasn't interesting to watch. In the prequels I can appreciate the complexity of choreography and the dexterity of performers. Here? Nothing of worth to look at.
If you want the audience to be invested in a serious fight scene it's generally a good idea to have the participants feel like they're struggling to overcome whoever's opposing them. Whether it's two kids trying to judo-throw eachother, or two space deities going head to head. The Fellowship of the Ring had two old geezers knocking eachother about with magic force pushes, but despite how unrealistic it was you still felt the impact and the struggle behind that fight.
In the Prequels everyone just effortlessly does everything -- not just the Jedi/Sith -- without even a drop of sweat, until in the end someone loses and the "fight" is over.Weren't you the one saying realism sucks?Oh, by the way.
>added weight
It's an energy blade. It has no weight.
Maybe instead of "realism" I should use the word "believable" and that is to say that the weapons seem like weapons. Nothing seems foam covered a fake feeling. Sure the settings are just as fake, but the whole movie didn't feel like it was shot in a green screen playground where the characters are floating around each other like Team America-esque marionette puppets. I feel like I'm watching a story with stakes, not a dance with expensive glow sticks.RealRT said:First of all - "realism". By God, does it make me facepalm. We're watching superpowered space knights duke it out with energy swords. What realism are you talking about?Kameburger said:I think he's saying, and I agree, that the prequel fights while at times fun and energetic. There was a campy, cartoonish element which undercuts the tension a bit ironically episode one's Darth Maul fight was the only one that felt like it had any stakes. While you could kind of rationalize it by saying that the Prequel trilogy Jedi were formally trained and polished so their technique was more graceful and fancy looking, the light saber duels had weight to them, and borrowed much more from episode 5 than anything else but added an element of realism and aggression to the action. Kylo was much more menacing than episode 3's Aniken simply because all his swings with his light saber had a presence, where as Aniken looked like he was swinging a toy and floating around.
That's not really the point I'm making but again it goes back to my last point. Bouncy and colorful is fine if it matches the tone you're trying to go for, but the prequels made everything feel like a joke. And yes the bounciness suits all the over acted nonsense of that trilogy very well. But in this movie Dancing flashy light saber battles would have undermined the drama of what's going on. The awkward figure skating dance off we saw at the end of episode 3 only makes you look at this guy who just murdered a whole school full of children as a whiny spoiled teenager. While trying my best not to spoil episode 7, if you had one of those flashy wire fights immediately following the scene before it, I think you would end up with another confusing character. .Second, since when did "realistic" become synonymous with "good"? Reality sucks. That's why we use escapist entertainment.
Not gonna fight you there. It certainly wasn't the highlight of the movie that's for sure.Third: it wasn't interesting to watch. In the prequels I can appreciate the complexity of choreography and the dexterity of performers. Here? Nothing of worth to look at.
Not the light saber, but the characters. The characters in the prequels literally felt like they were floating over a bunch of CGI sets (Cause they were). These characters at least didn't feel like they were attached to wires the whole freaking time. So misread what ever you want but I'm not talking about realism in the sense that anything is supposed to be realistic, but there has to be some level of immersion.Oh, by the way.
>added weight
It's an energy blade. It has no weight.
You DO know that, for example, Episode III had more practical sets than the whole OT combined, right?Kameburger said:Maybe instead of "realism" I should use the word "believable" and that is to say that the weapons seem like weapons. Nothing seems foam covered a fake feeling. Sure the settings are just as fake, but the whole movie didn't feel like it was shot in a green screen playground where the characters are floating around each other like Team America-esque marionette puppets. I feel like I'm watching a story with stakes, not a dance with expensive glow sticks.
I fail to see how it is confusing if it was set up before. I don't even know what awkward figure skating dance you saw in there.That's not really the point I'm making but again it goes back to my last point. Bouncy and colorful is fine if it matches the tone you're trying to go for, but the prequels made everything feel like a joke. And yes the bounciness suits all the over acted nonsense of that trilogy very well. But in this movie Dancing flashy light saber battles would have undermined the drama of what's going on. The awkward figure skating dance off we saw at the end of episode 3 only makes you look at this guy who just murdered a whole school full of children as a whiny spoiled teenager. While trying my best not to spoil episode 7, if you had one of those flashy wire fights immediately following the scene before it, I think you would end up with another confusing character.
These days, after Episode VII is out and all the legions of neckbeards who spent all the 2000s being far, far whinier than Hayden Christensen's voice could ever be, are now happy because a movie that caters to *their* tastes have finally came out (because it's basically OT all over again. I made a mistake of watching all six episodes prior to going to the Ep VII premiere and thus I was left with one two hour deja vu), I do it all the time. My face will be a bloody mess before Rogue One comes out.Not the light saber, but the characters. The characters in the prequels literally felt like they were floating over a bunch of CGI sets (Cause they were). These characters at least didn't feel like they were attached to wires the whole freaking time. So misread what ever you want but I'm not talking about realism in the sense that anything is supposed to be realistic, but there has to be some level of immersion.
In conclusion I hope you didn't hurt yourself palming your face so hard.
First off can we dial down the aggression a bit? I'm not even whining about the prequel trilogy just stating what I didn't like in comparison. That neck beard comment was really unnecessary.RealRT said:You DO know that, for example, Episode III had more practical sets than the whole OT combined, right?Kameburger said:Maybe instead of "realism" I should use the word "believable" and that is to say that the weapons seem like weapons. Nothing seems foam covered a fake feeling. Sure the settings are just as fake, but the whole movie didn't feel like it was shot in a green screen playground where the characters are floating around each other like Team America-esque marionette puppets. I feel like I'm watching a story with stakes, not a dance with expensive glow sticks.
I fail to see how it is confusing if it was set up before. I don't even know what awkward figure skating dance you saw in there.That's not really the point I'm making but again it goes back to my last point. Bouncy and colorful is fine if it matches the tone you're trying to go for, but the prequels made everything feel like a joke. And yes the bounciness suits all the over acted nonsense of that trilogy very well. But in this movie Dancing flashy light saber battles would have undermined the drama of what's going on. The awkward figure skating dance off we saw at the end of episode 3 only makes you look at this guy who just murdered a whole school full of children as a whiny spoiled teenager. While trying my best not to spoil episode 7, if you had one of those flashy wire fights immediately following the scene before it, I think you would end up with another confusing character.
Somehow nobody complained about bouncy and over the top fights in Pirates of the Caribbean. Gee, wonder why's that.
Also, we did end up with one hot mess of a character. He's interesting, but... do we really want him redeem himself? I don't. He's not really likeable. Hell, he seemed far more like a whiny teen ot me. At least Anakin had some sympathetic motivation and backstory (also, in the dub that I always watch these movies in, he was voiced by an actual man).
These days, after Episode VII is out and all the legions of neckbeards who spent all the 2000s being far, far whinier than Hayden Christensen's voice could ever be, are now happy because a movie that caters to *their* tastes have finally came out (because it's basically OT all over again. I made a mistake of watching all six episodes prior to going to the Ep VII premiere and thus I was left with one two hour deja vu), I do it all the time. My face will be a bloody mess before Rogue One comes out.Not the light saber, but the characters. The characters in the prequels literally felt like they were floating over a bunch of CGI sets (Cause they were). These characters at least didn't feel like they were attached to wires the whole freaking time. So misread what ever you want but I'm not talking about realism in the sense that anything is supposed to be realistic, but there has to be some level of immersion.
In conclusion I hope you didn't hurt yourself palming your face so hard.
I wasn't talking about you in particular, I was talking about people in general. Sorry for not clarifying that.Kameburger said:First off can we dial down the aggression a bit? I'm not even whining about the prequel trilogy just stating what I didn't like in comparison. That neck beard comment was really unnecessary.
Also I can't remember a single real set from episode 3, granted it's been a while but even so, it must be the least memorable of them. Despite that the prequel is supposed to tell the story of the rise of one of the most Classic menacing villains in film and still that never quite connects. Part of that is that this decidedly light hearted universe they made, makes every evil thing done in PT seem cartoonish. Pirates worked because everything in that world looked like it belongs there. The awkward to.igurr skating dance was the swashbuckling lava river adventure at the end of 3 where Anakin fights obiwan. That seen is them little rally floating over a 3D set peace. It really clashes with all the child murder literally in the scene right before.
Even speaking of character sympathy, Anakin has no sympathetic qualities what so ever, it's a story of him turning into a psychotic murderur because his work life gets in the way of his personal life. He's a guy who literally can't except the fact that people will die one day and decides to kill who ever it takes to stop that from happening. That's PT Anakin. Kylo Ren not with standing Anakin sucks as a character. He's either poorly written or poorly directed.
And I don't disagree with you, that sometimes fun to watch creative choreography is great, I'm just saying it should match the tone. And if you had to match a star wars trilogy's tone is chose OT over PT any day.
Exactly. The original films didn't have lightsabre fights, they had important plot and character moments in which the participants happened to be holding laser swords. The prequels had flashy ballet in which people we didn't know or care about failed to do or say anything much at all. How many words did the jedi exchange with Darth Maul in the entire Phantom Menace? Without watching it again to check, I'm pretty sure it's zero, and if not it's damn close. No-one killed or is anyone else's father, no-one's being called to turn to or reject temptation, no-one even knows who the bad guy is at all. Attack of the Clones was just as bad, the people involved in fights at least aren't mutes this time, but it's again characters we haven't been introduced to in any meaningful way fighting without any motivation other than "we're good guys and he isn't". Revenge was the only one that even attempted to do anything with the fights other than look flashy, and it's no coincidence that it's considered by far the best of the prequels. The fight between Vader and Obi-wan in Star Wars was objectively terrible, there was virtually no choreography at all, and what little there was was ruined by having the opponents be an old Shakespearean actor and a guy in suit who could barely move and see even less. But it's remembered more fondly than any fight from the prequels because it wasn't the swordplay and dance moves that were the important part.RJ Dalton said:The duels are supposed to be more intimate. If you look at the original movies, every time someone there was a duel, there was something personal going on between the two characters. The prequels looked nice, but they didn't amount to anything because the characters had no established relationships to each other.
Exactly. I think part of the problem is that most people have no idea what a sword fight actually looks like; they're too used to the Errol Flynn-style usually used in films where people dance around the place desperately trying to avoid accidentally hitting each other. It looks cool when done right and allows the participants plenty of opportunity for witty quips, but a lot of the time ends up looking far too choreographed and fake, and even if that's not the case it's going to get boring if it goes on too long (see also - pod races). Real fights are much less acrobatic, much shorter, and involve people actually trying to hit each other and not just the other person's sword. Modern fencing is somewhat stylised, but it's still reasonably accurate in the broad sense - the whole point is to actually hit the other person with your sword, and that doesn't involve dancing, spinning, or repeatedly banging your swords together above your heads. Jedi having fast reflexes wouldn't change that, it would just mean they're faster at doing the same basic things.Chimpzy said:Sure, the lightsaber duel didn't look all that acrobatic and impressive, but you know what it did look like? A real fight. An amateur fight perhaps, but a real fight nonetheless.
But that wouldn't leave them open. Swinging your sword too hard leaves you open because of momentum - once you've started the swing you can't easily stop it and it takes time to bring it back again. The same lack of weight that would make the swing quicker would also mean you could bring it back into position almost instantly. I agree that lightsabre use isn't especially realistic given how they're supposed to work, but that's ultimately for the same reasons the spaceship battles are so unrealistic as well - it's a stylistic choice based on the genres it was influenced by, not something that can be explained in-universe. I think their use in TFA was consistent with the previous films, so it makes sense that they showed inexperience by being slow and clumsy rather than in a more logical way that wouldn't be easily understood by most of the audience.Doctadoone said:The thing I found most, shall we say annoying about the fights, is that when they swung the lightsabers, it looked like a broadsword. As in, it had a heavy heft to it. Lightsabers, lorewise, were so light and so unlike other melee weapons, that they took so long to master. I think they had it backwards in the movie, the swings were slow where they should have been fast. If they wanted to show inexperience they could have swung the blade too far, leaving themselves open.